Someone asked me to share my research workflow in @logseq! Here's an overview of my very simple process 🧵 
1. Rewrite the article/chapter/section in my own words using the 3rd person (“[The authors] studied/argued”)
/2
/2
2. Evaluate the article using a checklist to assess clarity, novelty, “truth” (strength of arguments and evidence), how if at all it’s relevant to my own research question(s), and any general perceptions
/3
/3
for each source:
what is the author trying to say
is structure clear and logical
what is the thesis
what claims are made
what evidence is given
am i convinced
reasoning logical and consistent?
definitions, data representation
how it informs my work
general feelings/next steps
/4
what is the author trying to say
is structure clear and logical
what is the thesis
what claims are made
what evidence is given
am i convinced
reasoning logical and consistent?
definitions, data representation
how it informs my work
general feelings/next steps
/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
