Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Jan 27 6 tweets 2 min read
Why have all the British media, forgotten on purpose that in June 2019, Prince Andrew secretly met with Ghislaine Maxwell? This is not a rumour as in the Emily Maitlis interview, he admitted he met her. It was just weeks before Epstein's second arrest.
inews.co.uk/news/prince-an…
What this illustrates is how our media spin things to protect the Royal Family. This meeting was widely reported at the time, including in the British media. But since Maxwell's conviction it has never been mentioned. I thought the media were supposed to report facts and news?
This was at a time when neither the media, the victim's lawyers, and even the US authorities could trace Maxwell. Note that the report says she was accompanied by 4 serious people. Hardly a chance meeting as they met in Buckingham Palace.
Yet the British media are uncritically reporting Prince Andrew's new claim, that he was not a close friend of Maxwell. Yet at a time, when no one knew where Maxwell was, and the US had reopened the investigation of Epstein and Maxwell, Prince Andrew met with her in secret.
Why was this widely reported in the media, including the British media, in November 2019, and not now? When it is now far more relevant after Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking minors.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Jan 29
I've just read what Grant Shapps the UK's Transport Secretary said about climate activists and the climate crisis. I'm absolutely stunned by his profound ignorance of the situation. Remember, the UK government believes itself to be a climate leader.
1/
independent.co.uk/news/uk/grant-…
I don't want this discussion to be about either Grant Shapps or even the UK government. What I want to focus on, is the very real possibility that no major government, or senior politician, anywhere, has got even the slightest grasp of the climate and ecological emergency.
2/
What I want to focus on, is why this is the case.

Grant Shapps is a senior cabinet member, not known as a climate change denier. So we can take it that this is the view of the British government, not just one idiosyncratic view of one particular minister.
3/
Read 26 tweets
Jan 28
This my take on the debacle over Sue Gray's report and the Metropolitan Police. I believe it all changed when Downing Street police officers spoke to Sue Gray. That this put the Met in legal peril. The crucial bit is knowledge of the facts. #whitewash
1/
theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/j…
I suspect most official cover-ups operate around turning a blind-eye principle, and making yourself wilfully blind to the facts. That this is why the police had been so reluctant to not investigate the party scandal, Prince Andrew etc, for FEAR of what they might find.
2/
As long as the police etc, can convincingly deny all knowledge of a crime i.e. through plausible deniability, they can refuse to investigate it. So the Met could refuse to investigate partygate, right up until there was clear evidence.
3/
Read 12 tweets
Jan 28
An excellent thread from @GeorgeMonbiot. I have spent decades of my life trying to understand and work out this apparent paradox, and how this all works. The simply summary, is that none of this works like how we are taught. It's what I call a Conspiracy of Common Purpose.
1/
We are taught that any coordinated group needs a leader and a hierarchy, to coordinate. This is a demonstrable falsehood. Take football supporters. They chant and sing in unison. Do they go to choir practice and have a conductor? Of course not.
2/
I could give many other examples of large groups of people with a common interest binding them together - acting in a highly coordinated way, without a leader orchestrating them. In other words, groups can coordinate like a conspiracy, without there being a conspiracy.
3/
Read 21 tweets
Jan 27
All climate activists, environmentalists and climate activists, need to be aware of a plan by right wing climate change deniers, to replace Boris Johnson with an extreme right wing opponent of climate action, and they are using a big lie to justify this.
1/
I monitor the Mail, the Mail online to understand the right's perspective and thinking. They and a faction of the Tories are trying to scapegoat Carrie Johnson for ruining Brexiteer, Boris Johnson, and getting him to implement "Green policy".
2/
"The comments from Lord Frost are likely to be seen by some as a jab at Mr Johnson's wife, Carrie, who is a passionate environmentalist and has been credited with influencing the PM's previous declaration to pursue a 'green recovery' ..."
3/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Read 16 tweets
Jan 24
I am putting my thread written spontaneously underneath @GeorgeMonbiot's tweet, which is focused fury, in a proper thread. This is so it can be read like thread. Although I won't be able to number it, so look for unroll at the end. There's a few additional tweets.
This is the most abominable act of ecocide I have ever heard of. The equivalent of human genocide, but on our life support systems. Deliberate ecocide, rather than inadvertent ecocide through stupidity, is the most EVIL act imaginable. It is genocide of future generations.
I do not use these terms lightly. When European colonists first reached the Americas, they waged constant ecocide against the native inhabitants. Simply because they had a deep attachment to the land and wouldn't yield to them. so they tried to exterminate their whole culture.
Read 19 tweets
Jan 23
@peterwalker99 The Mail is running a dishonest propaganda campaign against cyclists. It's trying to tell people the new Highway Code overhauls are introducing new rules. This is a total lie, this is how it was when I took my driving test in 1977.
1/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Everyone of these so called knew rules were as taught to me in my driving lessons, and I was clearly told failure to adhere to them, or failing to explain this to the examiner in your driving test, would result in you failing your driving test.
2/
It's deliberately trying to whip up hatred against cyclists. Just look at the comments under the article.
3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(