THREAD: However @ukhomeoffice spins it, the inevitable outcome of the #BordersBill is that it undermines the international refugee regime. Not only does it violate multiple international laws, it will benefit the very gangs it's claimed to be tackling and put lives at risk. 1
Creating a two tier system for refugees is a clear violation of Article 31 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which prevents the refugees being penalised for their manner of entry into a country. 2/ unhcr.org/uk/3b66c2aa10
The government has tried to claim that it doesn't apply due to asylum seekers coming from France. There are so many issues with this that it is hard to start, but let's run through a couple of the big ones. 3/
Firstly that "directly" doesn't, for obvious reasons, mean not crossing other countries. While "directly" has been a source of contention in the law, it is recognised that refugees can transit multiple countries in order to seek asylum. 4/ refworld.org/pdfid/59ad55c2…
Then there is the claim that asylum seekers should seek asylum in the first "safe country". Here's the thing though, the concept of "first safe country" does not exist anywhere in law. It's a myth made up to avoid taking asylum seekers. 5/
Indeed, it has been found that while refugees do not have complete discretion over which country will process applications, there is "no obligation under international law for a person to seek international protection at the first effective opportunity" 6/ refworld.org/docid/3fe9981e…
Safety is inherently subjective, and the two main reasons given by asylum seekers for coming to the UK are family ties and language, two crucial elements to our independent concept of safety, particularly when you have had to leave everyone and everything you know behind. 7/
Then there is the not so minor matter that there are good reasons why some, and worth highlighting that we are talking relatively small number in the grand scheme, asylum seekers don't feel safe in France. The abuses against them are well catalogued. 8/ hrw.org/news/2021/10/0…
So, the #BordersBill automatically places the UK in contravention of one of the most important features of international refugee law, that a refugee must not be penalised for their manner of entry, something which UNHCR has condemned the government for. 9/ unhcr.org/uk/uk-immigrat…
Not only that, the bill would restrict the right of family reunion for those found to have entered the UK by anything other than the government's limited, and predominantly paused for now, resettlement routes, in contravention of refugee principles. 10/ unhcr.org/uk/excom/excon…
While the government likes to bang on about how more men than women cross the channel, these plans would further deny women and children with the ability to seek safety in the UK, as well as continuing to leave unaccompanied children at further risk. 11/ theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Next up we have how measures in the bill, and other proposals by the government such as "pushbacks", will pose a significant risk of the UK not only violating international refugee law, but also the law of the sea. 12/ independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Then we have the whole issue of how the bill treats the victims of trafficking and modern slavery. Not only would it not combat gangs, it has been found to potentially make it harder for survivors to come forward. 13/ committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/h…
Changes to age assessments then add to the risks, by potentially implementing provenly inaccurate "scientific age assessments" and reducing the threshold at which assessments can be conducted, which could see even more children treated as adults. 14/ committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc…
While under current regulations the Home Secretary can already remove citizenship from individuals, the bill expands the power by removing the need to notify them, among other things further undermining the ability to appeal the decision. 15/ stylist.co.uk/news/clause-9-…
All of this is just a quick snapshot of some of the issues, and by no means all. As the Bill enters its committee stage in the @UKHouseofLords it is clear that it poses fundamental risks to international refugee law, human rights, child protection, law of the sea etc etc. 16/
The Borders Bill, also referred to as the #AntiRefugeeBill, is the most significant attack against refugee rights for years. It undermines the international refugee order and any pretence of the UK being a moral arbiter on the global stage. It must not be allowed to pass. 17/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On #HolocaustRemembranceDay we remember those who died. We all promise not to let it happen again, and we all affirm we will always stand up against anti-Semitic, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-GRT, racist and other hateful and discriminatory views, and many then forget it in a heartbeat. 1/
We watch people saying how important it is to stand against this form or discrimination or that form, while then engaging in or defending some other form. We watch people going straight to the "Nazi" analogies to describe people they don't like. 2/
We watch genuinely harmful and hateful views, views which lead to people committing suicide in some extreme cases, and feeling destroyed more commonly, continuing to be spread. We see Holocaust denial rising and passed off as "legitimate opinion". 3/
There's not an insignificant part of me which thinks that rather than hanging their heads in shame Raab, Johnson et al will love this leak. As disturbing and sickening as it is, there's strong evidence to support the idea that a lot of voters prefer animals to refugees. 1/
It is possible that they may just try and spin this one out to play to the "humans can't go in the hold" brigade, ignoring that it is more about the administration time, access to airport, capacity once in etc which is the issue and why desperate people were left behind. 2/
Obviously runs risk of causing issues with current and ex-forces who saw people they worked with abandoned in favour of animals, but seeing as they have already shown contempt for the military and refugees with the whole "Navy and pushbacks" plan it doesn't seem to phase them. 3/
Thread: One of, many, reasons I am so sick and tired of the people who say those crossing channel "can't be asylum seekers because they are young men* is that those young men, as well as deserving safety themselves, allow for others to seek asylum. 1/
Or at least that is the main idea. It can cost a phenomenal amount of money to cross multiple countries to find one you feel safe in, and no, before anyone claims otherwise, asylum seekers don't have to seek it in the "first safe country". 2/
In fact the whole concept of "first safe country" doesn't only not exist in law, it doesn't exist in commonsense. Not only may places which are safe for some people not be for others, but it would inevitably lead to all asylum seekers being in a handful of countries. 3/
If you support the #PolicingBill you have to be supremely confident that at no point in the future you or anyone you care about will disagree with any British government. This isn't just about silencing protests now. It silences them afterwards as well. #r4today 1/
That's the thing with freedom and rights. When you celebrate them being stripped from people you disagree with, you inevitably ignore they're also being stripped from you. That's why we need to #KilltheBill, because of the precedent it sets and dangers to freedom it creates. 2/
You can't, as @RobertBuckland attempted to do on #r4today, argue that "proportionality" would protect people when you look at the disproportionate use of force by the police already against some peaceful protesters, such as at the Sarah Everard vigil. 3/ theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/j…
We're at the "mobilise the military" stage of deflection for government scandals. It's all smoke and mirrors. The government has no agreements with other countries to offshore asylum seekers any way. When will press stop uncritically regurgitating this bs. thetimes.co.uk/article/e6cbfa…
It is all just a game to the government. The countries they claim to be drawing up plans to set up offshore facilities in have already said no. They can't conduct pushbacks without breaking international law, causing more deaths and seriously pissing off the French.
It isn't even like these are new ideas. Labour under Blair was trotting out exactly the same bs as deflection way back when. So, instead of just churning out Home Office and Number 10 press releases how about the media actually starts reporting professionally?
Operations "red meat" and "save the big dog" aren't I would suspect massively badly chosen names, but actually quite deliberate. Number 10 knows that is is leaking like the Titanic after the iceberg, so it has to play with what it has. 1/
It has also been working on its "culture war" for long enough that it can finally start to use it to pay dividends, see also attacks on BBC among other things. They know, I suspect, that they can't actually argue their way out of the mess they are in, so have to lean into it. 2/
So, what do you do? Well, you make what would otherwise be seen as elitist, self-serving egotism come across as more "one of the lads. Down to earth plain speaking". You don't try and polish the turd, so to speak, because there's no way you can do that. 3/