It's pretty well documented that extremists & conspiracists are more willing to pay someone to tell them what they want to hear than other sociopolitical groups.
Since they keep 10% of the money, keep that in mind when Substack talks about protecting free speech.
Since they keep 10% of the money, keep that in mind when Substack talks about protecting free speech.
People who won't subscribe to their hometown newspaper for $4 a month are happily giving a conspiracy theorist $50 a month.
Never forget that over a thousand Anons were paying $5 a month to read an updated list of everyone this guy said had been executed and replaced by clones and/or robots. 
What I'm really saying is that it's pretty easy to 'protect free speech' when the speech you're currently protecting overwhelmingly pays the bills.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
