QAnon John's antisemitic talking points are not a bug of QAnon, they're a feature.
Let's do a little Flashback Friday.
In Sep 2018, QAnon's subreddit was shuttered. Q sent everyone to a new board on Voat.
1/
Voat shared some similarities with Telegram (where Q Promoters would encourage everyone to go after the Jan 2021 Twitter purge), notably that the place was riddled with Nazis.
When they showed up in Q threads, some Anons objected, and the Nazis quickly responded.
2/
While Voat was *explicitly* a neo-Nazi hang out spot, it's not as if the /qresearch/ boards weren't antisemitic to begin with. They always have been.
3/
For many months, a link to discussion of the same "Jewish Question" mentioned by the Voat Nazis was listed in the Table of Contents post on each new /qresearch/ thread.
4/
QAnon John isn't some sort of outlier here. Most big Q Preachers have shared the same material.
It's a feature of the movement, not a bug.
5/
When GhostEzra went full neo-Nazi, and the other Q promoters "called him out," please notice they don't even specify their criticism, just that GE was 'truth sprinkled with lies.'
They can't call it out because they know they've said the same things, just quieter.
6/
Those Nazis on Voat were ultimately correct: the Q followers who objected to the Nazi stuff were either naive or new to the movement.
The deeper you get in QAnon, the more they're told that the real problem is the Jews.
This "we only hate *fake* Jews" stuff is a midpoint.
7/
They've been doing this dance for years, leading true believers to the desired conclusions while maintaining a veneer of plausible deniability.
It's pretty well documented that extremists & conspiracists are more willing to pay someone to tell them what they want to hear than other sociopolitical groups.
Since they keep 10% of the money, keep that in mind when Substack talks about protecting free speech.
People who won't subscribe to their hometown newspaper for $4 a month are happily giving a conspiracy theorist $50 a month.
Never forget that over a thousand Anons were paying $5 a month to read an updated list of everyone this guy said had been executed and replaced by clones and/or robots.
Contrary to what he says, not everyone who disagrees with Jim's conclusions is a paid op or part of an organized harassment campaign against him.
Some of us just find a fair amount of his work to be half-assed, often dubiously sourced, and sometimes simply incomplete.
tl;dr--
Great question. The doc appeared about 2 mos in and borrows a lot of language from similar threat assessments on Islamic radicalization. Based on the implementation slide, I would guess the author is from a hacktivist background.
With this detail noticed by @conspirator0, and the details previously reported about the Dec 18 meeting in the Oval, I think it is extremely likely Sidney Powell authored the draft.
Well hey, look what's still a thing: it's Qux Box! @willsommer
For those who may not remember, the Qux Box was crowdfunded last year and promises to create its very own private internet for those who purchase at $199. thedailybeast.com/ex-infowars-st…
It strikes me as odd to send the release @ gmail but provide contact info @ protonmail, but maybe someone smarter than me can say if it's actually weird.
Also odd that 'Trevor Fitzgibbon' would be handling this personally and not through his company Mission Critical Media.