Article on front of @nytimes this morning praises Republicans for “message discipline” in attacking Biden’s policy around inflation & Afghanistan, but offering no counter policies themselves. Good journalists would hold them accountable for policy. nytimes.com/2022/01/28/us/…
Most popular alternative to any current policy is “awesome policy to be named later”, so trashing Democratic policy w/o naming new policy is great strategy, but only works if mainstream media accepts “assume policy to be named later” rather than hounding Republicans for policy.
Republicans used this strategy w/ ObamaCare headlining *4* election cycles w/ “repeal & replace”, mainstream media inviting people to imagine “replace” would be “awesome policy to be named later” when it was actually *nothing*, this actual policy was *super dangerous & unpopular*
In short: mainstream media should not praise Republicans for message discipline of having no policy on Afghanistan & inflation, but instead drag the opposition to explain to US what they would do different if they were in power. That is how you hold power accountable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
