It contains 22 open questions around financial stability, financial inclusion, privacy, legal questions etc.
5/ What looks like a purely formal process could become a powerful way for the crypto community to build up political pressure against the entire project or at least certain design choices.
The FED will in all likelihood publish the results (like the ECB) and factor them in.
6/ In Europe, the ECB consultation ended with a record level participation (driven by Germany) and a crystal-clear mandate that Europeans want payments to remain a private matter.
7/ You can't unfortunately rank the features like in the ECB consultation (the FED might have had a close look at how it went), but you can offer your viewpoint in the 22 open questions.
Question 22 for example: Are there additional design principles that should be considered?
8/ The US public doubling down on the EU feedback would be a powerful political message.
2/ The most spectacular event was the French banking giant @SocieteGenerale (6th biggest bank in Europe) submitting a public governance proposal on MakerDAO to have their new bond tokens approved as collateral for $20m in DAI. coindesk.com/business/2021/… @MakerDAO@RuneKek
3/ Having a multinational bank engaging on a DeFi governance forum with a DAO and a bunch of pseudonymous Maker contributors is mindblowing - and surely won’t pass unnoticed by other banks.
This is probably the largest banking DeFi adoption step to date.
1/ Germany implements FATF travel rule for crypto and adopts new crypto transfer regulation.
Although there are small improvements compared to the initial draft, this is a perfect example of how regulation in the crypto space should not look like
2/ Since October 1, CASPs (crypto asset service providers, i.e. exchanges, custodians etc.) in Germany have to comply with the new regulation. That means they have to record & exchange information (name, address etc.) about the originator & beneficiary of every transaction.
3/ When transacting with unhosted/non-custodial wallets, they are also asked to collect that information, unless they can assure the traceability of the transaction in some other way.
1/ Why didn't market prices react to the terrible crypto provision in the infrastructure bill in the US?
IMO, because the main signalling was ultra bullish. Crypto has become a political force. And, frankly, we have a lot to learn from that in Europe. wsj.com/articles/bitco…
2/ How the crypto industry was able to organize itself and make its voice heard in DC was one of the most bullish long term signals ever. Many see political and regulatory headwind as one of the major long term risks: “What happens if politicians just outright ban crypto?”
3/ The industry’s capacity to delay this bipartisan, $1 trillion dollar bill – probably the largest legislative project during the Biden-administration – over a "mere" tax clause shows how implausible & unfeasible such a political threat has become. There are several reasons why