year ago that it is still cheap now. We have it earning $0.79 in calendar 2022 and $1.40 in calendar 2023. So at $4.75/share its trading at a 6 p/e for 2022 and 3.4 p/e for 2023. EBITDA multiples are 5.4x for 2022 and 3.4x in 2023.
Like many formerly distressed equities the
earnings leverage from operational turnaround, deleveraging, and tax loss carry forwards are especially rewarding for investors. Because of Canada being so lock-down focused in 2021, $BGI is only just starting to show what it can do. Most US retailers are in the opposite
position - having already had their run.
Also, remember that $BGI was remodeling its stores in calendar 2019 (pre-Covid) and so that is not a normal base year to compare off. As such our 2022 and 2023 revenues estimates are really not aggressive at all. We are not counting on
the jewelry boom that swept the US during reopening in 2021. In fact, with Birks having already reported its holiday sales we have a very good feel for the 2022 results at this juncture.
The top-line is solid and has more risk to the upside, but the real story is the expected
profitability rebound driven by its long-awaited full roll-out of its Birks branded jewlery. The in-house manufactured product has multiples of the gross margin that 3rd party sales have and this category has grown its SKUs to a point where it will be the dominant profit
contributor going forward. The category is currently comping 2021 sales in the mid-20s. It is capable of even more as we get back to a post-pandemic world.
BGI has been rock solid during the market sell-off and there is a small cohort of buyers who have a long view of the
company’s prospects and expect to make multiples on their money. Management/family shareholders have not been selling despite the stock’s run last year. Share float remains small and short sellers - which were a problem last year during the lock-down periods - have largely
given up.
While we do not expect the family owners to agree to an M&A the business would be worth $14-20/share on public comps. Instead we expect 2 years of rapid deleveraging and the announcement of further growth initiatives for Birks branded jewelry outside of Canada.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Slowing growth in the US is the dominant narrative. It remains to be seen if we will get inflationary 1Q-2Q data before we get to inflation falling. But there is no debate on growth dropping despite a lagging strong Jobs print in January/Dec.
$BGI – a
deep value small cap does well in lower growth/lower inflation (worst overall market environment) as has been demonstrated this month. The fact it has an oil and gold angle makes it far more robust than most other value plays. The only things outperforming it are classic
defensive sectors (Utes, Staples) and O&G.
BGI can take off in an oil surge given the Canadian economy (and stock market) correlations to oil & gas as well as higher global rates.
BGI can also take off in a gold surge which is triggered by US asset (stocks and bonds)
Major funds/banks partner chatter is signaling a market crash. One specifically has obviously one of the best lines into Fed and have a very risky balance sheet so when the Fed waves the caution flag they need to permeate that awareness to at least 100 people in the firm to "slow
down or brace”. That makes it one of best indicators in the world. Oil is out of control and headed north of $100 and US equities simply cannot handle that combined with China “reboot”.
The Fed has finally trapped itself in doom loop of inflation and propping up the equity
market using several tools in its arsenal. The market simply no longer believes in the over valuation of equities and is calling the Fed out on its nonsense. Without stimulus, this market simply cannot go up much. Fiscal is needed in 30-45 days and a market correction could give
A certain major defense contractor has finally worked through all the legal implications of the executive order mandating the COVID vaccine.
This is what they’ve concluded…
if they don’t have 100% compliance by December 8th, they are at a serious risk of losing all current and future federal contracts if they are not, and also expecting for the company to not only be compliant to but force their tier 2 and 3 subcontractors to be compliant as well.
So a tier three subcontractor who only gets 10 percent of its revenue from a prime two levels up is expected to comply.
Defense officials and contractors are in total panic. There are experienced experts who are couple of years out from retirement who are going to retire rather
Democratic Party civil war upends Biden’s Build Back Better timetable
Losing political capital has consequences. The inability to pass legislation is the biggest consequence of all in the Beltway.
The moment that the Afghanistan decision was falling apart in real-time under
the global media’s scrutiny, that was the end of Joe Biden’s political capital. We noted in April that the Reconciliation bill would have trouble passing and the desperate attempt of Democrats to tie the Budget and Infrastructure bills to it should have waved red flags to
analysts against its passage. Creating political vacuums does not only cause conflict in geopolitics, but also domestic politics, which is precisely what has materialized between the progressives lead by Jayapal and the old guard represented by Pelosi.
- 3 bills are in question, Infrastructure(passed by Senate), Reconciliation($3.5 trillion package), and Budget
- Reconciliation bill is where the Dems have loaded up social issues(voting, Immigration, etc) to appease their base, which requires 60 votes under the rules.
- Progressives in the House number 95 votes and have said they will not vote for infrastructure if this doesn’t pass, tying virtually all 3 together
- Senate Parliamentarian upheld the limits of that reconciliation process so Dems could not use 51 majority rule to pass it where
Manchin and Sinema(in reality 4 others also) were roadblocks to avoid filibuster
- To get around this, Dems are attempting to combine Budget and Reconciliation to force the GOP and moderate Dems to vote on it using blackmail/pressure from market turbulence
had lost significant influence and any real footprint in Central Asia. After being booted out of Uzbekistan, the reality in keeping forces in Afghanistan became much more evident if the Pentagons long term lily pad strategy was to be properly implemented across the region. Since
Obama had destroyed US influence in Turkey, that option to stress Iran’s defenses for any possible future conflict was logically now going to fall onto Afghanistan forward operating positions rather Turkey where we likely would get no permission from Ankara.