LawBeat Profile picture
Feb 1 4 tweets 2 min read
#AllahabadHighCourt declines to handover the custody of minor girl child from her father to her mother in a habeas corpus writ petition.

Court said that in such matters, writ of habeas corpus will be entertainable only if the child has been detained illegally/without authority.
The couple had already filed for divorce. Taking this fact into account, court said that in such matters, the remedy would lie under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 or Guardians, and Wards Act, 1890 GWA, as the case may be and, accordingly, rejected woman's plea.
Marriage between child's parents had taken place in 2014 and she was born in 2016.
In 2020, following matrimonial disputes, her mother was allegedly kicked out of the house and since then she was seeking her child's custody.
“In matter of custody of a child, a writ of habeas corpus would be entertainable, where it is established that the detention of the minor child by the parent or others is illegal and without authority of law," Court clarified.
@ISalilTiwari reports
lawbeat.in/news-updates/h…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Feb 2
Delhi High Court to continue hearing plea against marital rape exception in IPC. The matter is being heard by a bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar.
The last update may be read here:

lawbeat.in/top-stories/ma…
@karunanundy to continue arguments for striking down of exception.

#maritalrape
Read 31 tweets
Feb 2
🚨 Delhi Court, Karkardooma Courts will hear Umar Khalid’s bail hearing in connection with the Delhi Riots Larger conspiracy case. Prosecutor is arguing currently. #DelhiRiots Image
On the last date, Prosecutor had told Court that group chats show 5 members, including Safoora & Sharjeel, already knew about upcoming violence even before @KapilMishra_IND’s alleged instigation on February 17. “Bhai kuch nai hua, Kapil Mishra gaya, police le gayi usse,” it read
Hearing will begin at 12 pm once ASJ Amitabh Rawat joins Virtual Court #delhiriots
Read 46 tweets
Feb 2
A matter is mentioned before Delhi High Court against the alleged transportation of camels in violation of norms and rules under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for Republic Day.
Adv. Ankur Bhasin: Ministry of Roads, Transport and Highways says clearly in reply to me that no motor vehicle which transports any other goods will be allowed to transport animals.
Bhasin: Camels and animals are not goods that can be transported in this manner.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
A 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court will continue to hear today petitions challenging various provisions of the PMLA.
#SupremeCourt
#PMLA Image
Yesterday, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal had made submissions before court on the interpretation of Section 50 PMLA and how it was a penal statute and the officer under it are police officers.

Read the thread here:
Bench assembles.
Read 37 tweets
Feb 1
Delhi High Court to continue hearing plea against marital rape exception in IPC.
@karunanundy for RIT Foundation: The last proposition of Independent Thought that is binding upon the present decision is that marriage is not institutional but personal.
Justice C Hari Shankar: Ms. Nundy is this your understanding of how the inversion test is applied according to Nevada.

@karunanundy: Yes, My Lords.

J. Shankar: Is this how you apply it? That you pick each sentence and put a not into it??
Read 35 tweets
Feb 1
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing the plea by a woman judge seeking reinstatement on the grounds that she was forced to resign as she was transferred for raising sexual harassment allegations. SGI to make submissions
SG:She substantiates her resignation on basis of 3 grounds.

Justice Gavai: After her transfer her representations were rejected. She had no other alternated.

SG: A mere incident of transfer based on rejection of representation is not enough to say its coercion
SG: She seeks the #SupremeCourt to declared that High Court connived together with others to enable her resignation. Findings of the committee were not challenged, so far as the transfer is concerned the committee says its irregular. This merely is no reason to say she was tormen
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(