In this thread I'll walk you through my assumptions for the bear, base and bull case for Spotify.
The deck has seven chapters, starting with "SPOT AT A GLANCE".
2/
With 172m paid subs and 381m MAUs $SPOT is the clear leader in music streaming (35% ms). SPOT is 2x the size of its nearest competitor $AAPL in terms of paid subs and has 2x the user engagement.
But so far SPOT never turned a full year profit + the stock dropped sharply TTM.
3/
In music, $SPOT has to pay out ~2/3 of rev to rightsholders, its supplier base is highly concentrated (top 4 labels account for 78% of all streams).
To loosen the labels’ grip on economics, SPOT pushes into podcast adverts with 45-50% gross margin potential vs. 30% in music.
4/
How does $SPOT try to differentiate from $APPL or $AMZN in music streaming? Since each DSP boasts roughly the same music catalogue (commodity), DSPs' value shifts from aggregation to discovery.
SPOT is superior in discovery/UX/personalization which drives faster MAU growth.
5/
“INDUSTRY BACKGROUND”:To understand SPOT’s growing importance to the recorded music industry, one has to remember how piracy (#Napster, Kazaa) was crushing the record labels from 2000-2014.
#Streaming revived this shrinking industry and made it grow high single digit again.
6/
Having the world’s entire music catalogue in your pocket for $9.99/month (35% cheaper than $NFLX) is a clear bargain
Yet, with 443m industrywide paid subscribers only 10% of all payment enabled smartphones are penetrated so far.
The industry could grow to >1 bn paid subs LT
7/
“COMPANY BACKGROUND”: SPOT was founded 2006 by swedish tech entrepreneur @eldsjal and @MartinLorentzon. Ek – at this point 23 yrs old – sold his adtech co Advertigo to Lorentzon’s affiliate marketing network Tradedoubler before for $2m.
Lorentzon got rich through TD's IPO.
8/
$SPOT has an engineering driven culture/runs thousands of experiments. Co has a bets board, resources go to #1 bet first, #2 bet afterwards etc
"If you're slow, you better be right most of the time. If you're fast, you can test/iterate more, creating a culture of innovation"
9/
“MUSIC ROYALTIES 101”: The music industry knows two separate core intellectual property rights: the song (controlled by publishers) vs. the sound recording (controlled by record labels).
Whenever music is played or streamed, rightsholders are entitled to receive royalties.
10/
Four findings:
1. in live music labels don’t have to be paid (the song is used, master recording isn’t)
2. rights owners are often obliged to license radio stations
3. US radio stations only pay for the song rights
4. artists make the majority of $$$ from live touring
11/
Music publishing ($6.0 bn) is a fraction of the $21.6 bn global recorded music industry (labels), mostly because producing/studio time/equipment has more costs and value than writing a song on a piece of paper.
30% of publishing revenue comes from music streaming DSPs.
12/
62% of recorded music industry ($21.6 bn) comes from streaming. Labels receive ~55% of all DSPs’ streaming revenue vs. 10-15% for publishers.
Labels act as VCs, pay cash advances for exclusive ownership of the artists’ future master recordings with unknown hit/CF potential.
Spoiler: in his post he’ll touch upon how much more $$$ Indie Taylor Swift could make vs. Major Label Taylor
14/
@benthompson of Stratechery once said that “the value of tech companies is often inversely proportional to the value of the publishers”.
To understand why labels can extract so much value from $SPOT it's important to realize how valuable e.g. the #1 label $UMG (32% ms) is.
15/
"A PIVOT IN STRATEGY: AUDIO > MUSIC": to solve the gross margin problem in the core biz, Daniel Ek declared that all audio — not just music — will be the future of $SPOT.
A high priority is reaching the #1 position in podcast consumption (achieved in 60+ countries incl US).
16/
Podcast monetization at industrywide 3-4 cents per consumption hour is still in its infancy.
Compared to time spent, podcasts are 10X underpriced vs. other media.
With better targeting and call-to-action cards, dynamic podcast ads should close that gap meaningfully LT.
17/
With the Spotify Audience Network $SPOT tries to replicate what $GOOGL built with AdSense for small publishers.
The crucial building block for GOOG's network business was acquiring #DoubleClick in 07 (for 2x(!) the price of #YouTube).
With Megaphone I expect $SPOT brought in €150-200m in podcast revenue in FY21.
This business is growing +200% organically vs. $ACAST +87% and 30%+ industrywide growth (according to IAB).
It's evident: the leading players in Dynamic Ad Insertion (DAI) rapidly take share.
19/
"Long term, I believe at the very least, [advertising] should be 20% of our revenues, but it might possibly be a lot more than that, 30%, 40% even, over the next 5 to 10 years.” – Daniel Ek
Podcast ads have 45-50% gross margin potential compared to 30% for the core biz.
20/
"Financials and thoughts on valuation": with first insights into Marquee and podcast ad sales initiatives $SPOT upped its financial long-term targets in 21.
To get close to their revenue targets and offset geo mix, $SPOT will have to raise prices in mature markets where market share is high.
At $9.99 SPOT is 35% cheaper than $NFLX standard ($15.49).
LT SPOT could be priced at $20 (incl more O&Es, meditation, audiobooks, live).
22/
I rarely encounter a stock, where investors derive such a wide range of different fair values.
SPOT’s LT value depends on how one judges:
- its podcast strategy
- core music margin pathway/2SMP
- subscriber growth
Here's the issue: these are all really hard to predict.
23/
Wildcard I: $SPOT could push more into social after #ByteDance's Resso made social functions (sharing, commenting) front and center of their UX.
Wildcard II: SPOT could co against #Clubhouse with Greenroom and leverage SPOT's +400m MAUs to become the standard for live chat.
24/
"CONCLUSION": I think the Street still sees $SPOT as a MAU growth story, when in fact it’s more and more shifting to a monetization story of 400+m users.
As a sentiment check, what do you think will drive the stock narrative for SPOT over the coming quarters?:
$GOOG $AAPL $META The Digital Markets Act is in effect for more than a full quarter now. It’s a new EU law that regulates large tech companies and e.g. Alphabet, Apple and Meta must follow a long list of new obligations. Below’s an overview of what has changed so far.
1/
“Gatekeepers” are the largest providers of digital core platform services (CPS) in the EU and only they are governed by the DMA. The EC originally designated six firms as gatekeepers: Google, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, and Microsoft.
$BKNG is the newest addition to the group. It recently surpassed the thresholds and was designated as the seventh gatekeeper by the EC in May 2024. It received six months to comply with all of the DMA’s obligations by November.
2/
But what exactly are the obligations? And how do they impact a company’s behavior?
If one goes through the full text of the law, one basically ends up with a list of four “Dos” and four “Don’ts”.
You can see the four “Dos” below, i.e. what a gatekeeper must allow in the EU:
$GOOG $AAPL As expected, Google lost its antitrust lawsuit United States v. Google in first instance. Below are 10 initial observations about yesterday’s decision, what’s next and why the company could ultimately prevail on appeal.
1/
Judge Mehta from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia released a 286 pp. strong opinion yesterday in which the court held that a) the markets for general search services and general search text ads are relevant product markets, b) Google has monopoly power in those markets (demonstrated through indirect evidence in the form of 89.2% share in the market for general search services and 88%+ share in the market for general search text ads, c) Google’s distribution agreements are exclusive and have anticompetitive effects and d) Google has not offered valid procompetitive justifications for those agreements.
In short, Google’s defense strategy to highlight healthy “competition for the contract”, cross-market benefits and the fact that its default deals “allow the browser’s search functionality to work effectively out of the box” were not accepted as procompetitive justifications by the judge.
2/
With this decision, the liability phase of the lawsuit ends. Next up is the remedy phase. The same court will hear proposals from both Google and the DOJ what kind of remedies are appropriate to end the illegal practices. Both parties must propose a schedule for proceedings regarding the remedy phase until September 4.
1/9 $MSFT $ATVI appealing to the CAT means they will have to demonstrate how the CMA today acted irrationally, illegally or with procedural impropriety.
2/9 The CAT (UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal) is a different judicial body than the CMA. Appeal cases are heard before 3 CAT members: the President or Chairman plus 2 ordinary members, who can be experts in law, business, accounting, economics or other related fields.
3/9 Looking forward to see some experts coming up with an expected timeline for the completion of this appeal. Historically, the Tribunal aims to hear cases in less than nine months.
1/14 A lot to unpack regarding the result of FEMSA's strategic review. $FMX stock gained +9% (~$3 bn.) yesterday and now trades at 52W high.
FMX will divest its 14.8% stake in Heineken worth ~$7.9 bn pre tax (23% of market cap) and return excess cash to shareholders over 2-3yrs.
2/ The divestment plan doesn't stop with $HEIA. To "materially simplify corporate structure", FMX will seek strategic alternatives for Envoy (Logistics & Distribution) and its minority investments like Jetro (Cash & Carry).
Parts of Solistica will be integrated as cost centers.
3/ Upon completion of the plan, FEMSA will be left with 3 core business priorities:
1. RETAIL - primarily OXXO c-stores 2. $KOF - 47.2% stake in LatAm's leading bottler 3. DIGITAL - primarily SPIN by OXXO, Premia
In this thread I'll walk you through my assumptions why FEMSA owns one of the best retail assets in LatAm with sizable growth potential.
The deck has eight chapters, starting with "FMX AT A GLANCE".
2/
$FMX owns c-store chain OXXO: the clear market leader in Mexico with 20k stores and an 85% share of the formal market.
OXXO has a 10x lead vs. #2 $SVNDY (7-Eleven) in Mexico and >13m people shop at its stores every day. It's the #2 domestic retailer by revenue after $WALMEX
3/
Besides its retail arm, FMX owns equity stakes in two mature beverage companies, $KOF & $HEIA, that generate stable amounts of FCF and fund the company’s dividends.
$FMX owns 47.2% of Coca-Cola FEMSA, 14.8% of Heineken plus some emerging distribution and digital businesses.