Yesterday I watched the long debate which took place a few weeks ago between Melanchon & Zemmour. 3 observations in a 🧵
1. the level of arguments & discussion - even between these 2 extremist politicians- was way, way above the standards of UK politics.
This was a genuine debate of ideas & principles. It so happens that I disagree with most of them but it was genuinely interesting.
2. After the end of each discussion theme - e.g. immigration, security, defence- the debate stopped for a Fact Checker which corrected false
assertions & statistics of the 2 candidates, giving them a chance to reply when they were corrected. This showed up the mendacity of Zemmour: when corrected with genuine statistics, he attacked the statistics provenance. Melanchon was far more gracious.
3.Whatever one thought of these individuals, this was good politics i.e. a genuine debate of ideas & 2 competing vision of the world, not a Punch & Judy exchange of 3 words slogans. It brought to light the degradation of the political debate in the UK.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mafevema #CommonGround

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mafevema

Feb 4
So true:
"Elections are won by parties with a compelling and optimistic, forward-looking story about themselves and how they will change the country. The Tories still have one; Labour does not."  What could this compelling narrative be? 🧵 on.ft.com/3rshLvG via @FT
Labour badly needs all hands on desk and this means including others from outside the now sclerotic Labour movement. In particular Labour needs to work hand in hand with the Libdems & the Greens & even include discussions with & ideas from new parties like True & Fair.
Working with other parties and running as a #ProgressiveAlliance is, as I argued below, the surest way to present a compelling, optimistic & exciting narrative of renewal & modernisation
Read 10 tweets
Jan 19
Beth Rigby did it just right: softly, softly, no aggression. Just calm, precise questioning, with a hint of pity. Something which makes it impossible for Johnson to react with his usual aggressive boosterism because it would look out of place & fake. Starmer missed it.
It could have been devastating if it had been calm, cold and forensic, like a scientist dissecting a particularly unpleasant & stinky specimen.
Playing to the gallery was a mistake. Yes, it got laughs on the Labour benches but it didn't do the job.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 3
A real & present danger. The handmaid's tale narrative coming to life.
theguardian.com/us-news/2022/j…
Homer-Dixon says that a fascist US regime would seek to undermine Canada. I am in no doubt that, should this scenario happen, the Conservatives if still in government would ally with America & join forces to seek to destabilise the EU.
The dangers presented by the Brexiters are not only domestic. Close to & financially supported by the US extreme right, they are a threat to a weakened international order. Some leaders like Draghi or Macron - and hopefully Scholz- see this. Other are oblivious or (🇵🇱🇬🇧🇭🇺)
Read 5 tweets
Jan 1
Almost six out of 10 (57 per cent) believe Boris Johnson lied to them about what Brexit would be like during the bitter referendum campaign of 2016.
More than half of those questioned (51 per cent) want a referendum on rejoining at some point, with 39 per cent saying it should come in the next five years, compared to just 32 per cent who say the issue should never be reopened.
When asked what effect Brexit had so far had on the UK’s interests generally, some 38 per cent said it had been damaging, against just 27 per cent who said it had improved matters.
Read 18 tweets
Dec 9, 2021
These are the reasons @DJAHallam gives for asking Labour voters not to vote for Helen Morgan:
She is he says "obsessed with nazis". This is because she:
- told Patel to "tear up her Goebbels'manual" because of her approach to propaganda around refugees
- compared the PM's attempts to prorogue Parliament as acting like "what Hitler did in 1933" & a "shameless power grab"
- compared the situation of Jewish people fleeing war and persecution to the situation of the refugees doing the same today
I am rather impressed by Mrs Morgan
Note that before posting this article, he started by implying she was pro-nazis. The honest Mr Hallam.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(