Thread by @ciabaudo

I hate to agree with Boris Johnson (who in my eyes is a thug, a liar, a traitor and totally unfit for public office) or @toryboypierce (the press wing of the Tory party), BUT if Starmer wasn't involved in the Savile case he was an ABSENTEE DPP!
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…

Although from the basest of motives by a PM who said funds spent on @inquiryCSA was 'money spaffed up a wall', Johnson's comments put a salty finger in an open wound.
It actually surprises me Starmer said it was a slur peddled by right-wing trolls and not by anti-Semites.

@toryboypierce would do the nation a massive service if he were to do a deep investigation into the close links between Epstein and Mandelson, the man who Starmer called on as an advisor and who seems to be pulling the strings in Labour.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

Which ever way you look at it, if Starmer knew about the Savile case he was part of the coverup. If he didn't know that his department was involved in a case against Britain's leading DJ who hobnobbed with Prime Ministers, it was a dereliction of duty.
conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2…

Alison Levitt identified severe shortcomings, including missing files, in the way the CPS handled the Savile case on Starmer's watch, a case which had realistic prospects of convictions.
So was Levitt, wife of Baron Carlile, a slur-peddling right-winger out to smear Starmer?

C'mon, can you imagine a DPP not wanting to be updated on the minutiae of progress in a case involving a Papal Knight, TV personality and marriage counsellor to Lady Di who was courted by Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and Prince Charles?
Pull the other one!

'Far-right activists and paedophile hunters'
'Conspiracy theories of violent fascists'
'Ridiculous slur peddled by right-wing trolls'

Do you see an emerging pattern?
I do!