To all those spreading communal spins, here is something I’ve learned today through members of the Bhedkut and Sansi communities: Bhedkuts are nominally Hindu but follow many Sikh practices and customs. I was directed to this website #threadbhedkut.blogspot.com/p/bhedkut-pron…
As the person from the Bhedkut community who runs this website explains “Bhedkut call themseleves Hindu but their traditions are same as Sikh Dharam . Marriages and other ceromonies are based on Sikhism” bhedkut.blogspot.com/p/bhedkut-pron…
The accused are “Naharia” and as this blog explains, that is a sub gotra of the Bhedkuts. So I was 100% accurate when I said that the victim’s family had told our activists that they & the accused were both from the Bhedkut community. bhedkut.blogspot.com/p/custom-and-r…
Will those esteemed persons who were bullying feminists & journalists for exercising caution & avoiding a communal spin on a gender atrocity, bother to recant or express any remorse? Somehow doubt it.
Those who “dug deep” to claim the victim was Sikh (though her family never used that word to describe themselves and insisted they & the accused were Bhedkut), & never dug deep enough to find that the accused were also Bhedkuts, a community that follows some Sikh practices.
For feminist activists, who speak to and care for many survivors daily, most of whom aren’t in the news, all this virtue signalling & noisy bullying by keyboard warriors has been a distraction, draining precious mental and physical energy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@ghazalawahab Ghazala, I’m sorry, I’m rather shocked at your position. You’re missing the Islamophobic wood for the patriarchal trees. Who has the power in this situation? It’s the principal & the Sangh not the Muslim parents. See my thread addressing various arguments & scenarios.
@ghazalawahab The argument that hijab isn’t mandated by Islam is one to be had with anyone shaming Muslim women for NOT wearing it - not with Sanghis who are denying Muslim women education for wearing it. +
@ghazalawahab As for “who is teaching them to fight for this” - they can see the unfairness & Islamophobia in the ban, & the natural & just response is to resist it not to bow down before it.
On the one hand, auction Muslim women online & threaten to sexually enslave them. On the other, deny them the right to education. That’s BJP policy. #thread on how the ban on hijab is not only unconstitutional but absurd.
Kerala HC has clearly held that it was unconstitutional for CBSE to prevent girls in hijab from taking exams. The same applies here in Karnataka. indiankanoon.org/doc/185172001/
Let’s take objections to the hijab in colleges, one by one. 1) It’s patriarchal.
Well, the official Lok Sabha site has a photograph of one of the chairpersons, Smt Rama Devi, with her head covered. Likewise MP @HarsimratBadal_; hijab/dupatta - potato-potahto.
The age of marriage for all adults should be 18. If you’re old enough to choose a government, decide the country’s future you’re old enough to decide your own future; to marry or not. Support women’s autonomy, don’t force women to marry, don’t criminalise consensual relationships
Early pregnancies can be injurious to women’s health - the answer to that issue isn’t to criminalise adults who decide to marry. The answer is to ensure that women have the autonomy to decide if or when to marry, if or when to bear children.
For the BJP, health of young women is a mere pretext to criminalise women’s choice in love & marriage - something they are already doing through “anti conversion ordinances” & violent Sangh outfits that attack inter caste & inter faith couples.
What Ms Ranade calls “freebies” are in fact the opposite of “free = unearned”: they represent a “minimum” fraction of the wealth workers and farmers actually produce by their labour. My response to the anti Left tirade by @sonaliranadekavitakrishnan.substack.com/p/why-would-a-…
If we agree with Ms Ranade the Hindu majority was magnanimous enough to include Muslims & Christians in the idea of India, we imply it’s ok for Hindus to feel that in return for such magnanimity, the least Muslims & Christians can do is to avoid eating beef & converting Hindus.
Is it perhaps this shadow of Hindu supremacist ideology (the notion that India’s character as a nation & the rules for living in India are for the Hindu majority to decide) in secular liberal & left common sense that has helped land us where we are? bit.ly/3yv7D7k
@sonaliranade Here’s a point by point take down to all that’s wrong with your tweets: 1) Since 1920s some Hindus have demanded a Hindu SUPREMACIST nation in which others will be treated like Jews in Nazi Germany. No one has a RIGHT to such a nation.
+
@sonaliranade 2) Yet your question is pointless since Hindu supremacists have freely exercised the political freedom to demand a Hindu supremacist nation without any hurdles (barring the brief RSS ban). They have used parliamentary space to promote that agenda through hate speech with impunity
@sonaliranade 3) Just as whites don’t enjoy a right to a white supremacist nation, Hindus don’t have any entitlement to a Hindu supremacist nation. Likewise no one has a right to a Buddhist supremacist nation (like Myanmar) or an Islamist supremacist nation (Taliban in Afghanistan).
First they came with the NRC, and I thought, what’s the harm with just identifying the “infiltrators”?
Then they called the “infiltrators” termites - and I said, that’s not nice, they’re just illegal immigrants.
Next they began evicting the illegals and demolishing their homes, and I said, well the indigenous do need the land, but can’t you clear the settlements after the rains?
And then I saw with horror - my own brother dancing with such glee on that human chest with a neat red hole in it, saying “it’s great to kill termites”.
And I asked in shock, how and when did this happen? When did my own brothers become addicted to this drug of hate?