Left: One of our contemporary conservative originalists
Right: Article VI of the, um, Constitution
If you think the word “values” makes the statement acceptable, pause to imagine what this Governor would say if a Governor of a different state said they’d only appoint people who shared their Islamic values.
While the MO Governor's statement about only appointing "Christian" officials is fairly standard for the GOP these days, there was once a time when such statements were considered wholly inappropriate. Atiyeh was elected GOP Gov in 1978. Salem Statesman Journal, 10 August 1978.
Walter Huss, a fundamentalist who'd just become chair of the Oregon GOP, had stated that he preferred Republican candidates to be "Christian." Atiyeh, the GOP candidate for Governor, firmly called him out on this.
I'm not sure how aware Atiyeh was of this, but Huss's strong "pro-Christian" stance was connected to his virulent antisemitism. Huss generally kept his hatred of Jews quiet, but it suffuses his personal papers which are housed at the University of Oregon.
Anyway...there's obviously nothing wrong or inherently antisemitic about a public figure identifying themselves as a Christian. But when a politician says they see being a Christian as a *qualification* one should have to serve the public, then that's a very different thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Every constitution...naturally expires at the end of 19 years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right." Thomas Jefferson writing to James Madison, 6 September 1789. jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/selected-docum…
For more on Jefferson's anti-originalism, via Peter Onuf's insightful analysis of the subject.
You can agree or disagree with TJ's take on the Constitution (James Madison sure didn't buy it in its entirety in 1789), but anyone who knows anything about the founding era would know that it's not "spitting in the face" of the founders to talk about Constitutions evolving.
I’ll see your aphorism that “the answer to speech you don’t like is more speech” and raise you “Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it” by Jonathan Swift, 1710.
One of our two major parties has created an almost hermetically sealed media universe into which alternative perspectives and empirical reality have little chance of entering, and you think the solution is just to talk into that void more loudly?
I don’t know what the solution to our propaganda-warped political culture is, but I’m pretty sure publishing essays in magazines and tweeting more ain’t it.
This book is about 100 years old, but I'm thinking it might come in handy for some of our intrepid local school reformers, especially in the more Southern climes.
Chapter 2 of this excellent book discusses this wave of grassroots textbook surveillance (in the name of patriotic education). google.com/books/edition/…
The Oregon state election of 1922 was known as "the Klan election." That election elevated Kaspar K. Kubli to the speaker of the house where he led a delegation that was almost majority KKK members. The state senate had such a majority. This is one of the first laws they passed.
The most important thing to know about the 2nd KKK is that it was comprised largely of middle class people who thought of themselves as “Christian Patriots” defending the nation from the “threat” of immigrants who were deemed racially, culturally, and religiously “other.”
Strom was a close associate of Revilo Oliver, a neo-Nazi who began his career on the right as a John Birch Society member. Massie gave the keynote address at the JBS's 60th Anniversary meeting in 2018.
A good chunk of Oliver's correspondence is available online because Strom has curated it. I won't link to the site because of its Nazi associations, but it's useful for those who research the right. One example of the sorts of stories one can find there.