In reading this guy's story I see elements taken from Men In Black, Ender's Game, Robotech and Babylon 5.

Am I missing any? Image
This is an EXTREMELY ambitious grift Image
like mind-bogglingly ambitious Image
I just stumbled on the oldest piece with Cramer I've found: an anonymous interview in 2006 (!) that was de-anonymized by the interviewer in 2014 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Feminist Proper Gander

Feminist Proper Gander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dappergander

Feb 3
Looks like trouble coming from Lin Wood tonight, who has taken to his own channel after getting muted in a group chat with QAnon John where participants were yelling at each other. Image
Lin, Joe Flynn and others got very heated, and then the channel muted everyone except a friend of QAnon John's, who proceeded to monologue for over an hour. Image
this would be more exciting if it didn't take Lin 30 minutes to write each post
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
VILE CONTENT AHEAD

Okay.

Based on my experience, I would say this comes from pro-NFT guys who saw the response to the "Nazi Ape" blog and decided to run the age-old scheme of saying easily disproved things while pretending to be a member of a community they actually hate. Image
It's like an AITA thread saying "I am a committed vegan. AITA for asking my friend to publicly apologize for serving the cooked flesh of innocent animals during my toast at his wedding dinner?"

I mean, yes, you're the asshole, duh. But the real message is 'vegans are assholes.'
This might seem like grade-school shit.

It might seem really obvious as a technique to bring public scorn onto someone you dislike by pretending to be them and saying nonsense things.

But it works.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
Even when Jim has half a point, his evidence is just so sloppy and prone to error.

The only way you can claim he tweeted
"I hope you've enjoyed the 4chan posts.
Q"
is if you read the tweets backwards.

Timestamps, dude.

He tweeted
"Q
I hope you've enjoyed the 4chan posts."

1/7 Image
Does that make a difference?

Well, yes. It stops being a slam-dunk confession.

If a note said
"I'll be home soon.
Dave"
you would assume it was *from* Dave.

If it said
"Dave
I'll be home soon."
you would assume it was *to* Dave.

So which is it here?

2/7
Well, look at context:

Brower's "scoops" about Podesta and Sessions that he tweeted the previous day (and referenced in the image above) were CRAZY hot topics on 4chan.

There were HUNDREDS of 4chan posts about his tweets and the speculation that arose from them.

3/7 ImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Jan 30
okay going to go play a video game for a couple hours before bed
well that was pretty aggravating but I am now the proud owner of a two-star wolf that I named Scarlett
she is an extremely good doggo who did very well on the way home and did not jump out of the boat
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
QAnon John's antisemitic talking points are not a bug of QAnon, they're a feature.

Let's do a little Flashback Friday.

In Sep 2018, QAnon's subreddit was shuttered. Q sent everyone to a new board on Voat.

1/ Image
Voat shared some similarities with Telegram (where Q Promoters would encourage everyone to go after the Jan 2021 Twitter purge), notably that the place was riddled with Nazis.

When they showed up in Q threads, some Anons objected, and the Nazis quickly responded.

2/ Image
While Voat was *explicitly* a neo-Nazi hang out spot, it's not as if the /qresearch/ boards weren't antisemitic to begin with. They always have been.

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 27
It's pretty well documented that extremists & conspiracists are more willing to pay someone to tell them what they want to hear than other sociopolitical groups.

Since they keep 10% of the money, keep that in mind when Substack talks about protecting free speech.
People who won't subscribe to their hometown newspaper for $4 a month are happily giving a conspiracy theorist $50 a month.
Never forget that over a thousand Anons were paying $5 a month to read an updated list of everyone this guy said had been executed and replaced by clones and/or robots. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(