James Wilsdon Profile picture
Feb 3 13 tweets 8 min read
'ARIA will give tremendous power to those who sit inside its black box, making decisions about whom & what to fund. If ARIA succeeds...it must not do so behind closed doors.' Editorial in @Nature as ARIA Bill passes, unamended through Parliament. nature.com/articles/d4158…
Good to see a nod here to last week’s @FoundSciTech debate, where I raised this issue with @uksciencechief, as part of a broader shift towards securitisation & secrecy in UK public research funding. foundation.org.uk/Events/2022/Ho…
But depressing & concerning that despite widespread pushback on this issue, within & beyond Parliament, the ARIA Bill has passed, unamended, without any improvements to its centralised & unaccountable governance model. hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-0…
Science minister @GeorgeFreemanMP insults both our & his own intelligence by repeating the claim that ARIA’s “small staff need to be sure that they will not be tied up answering 101—often spurious—FoI requests.”
For a start, FoI rules already allow organisations to refuse “vexatious” requests or those which are too expensive or time consuming to fulfil. cfoi.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
But far more important here are fundamental principles of openness, transparency & accountability in the public research funding system (which as minister @GeorgeFreemanMP should fight to protect & uphold).
Here’s @OttolineLeyser @UKRI_CEO making an eloquent defence of these principles to the ARIA Bill committee back in April 2021. hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-0…
As an ~£8bn turnover public body, @UKRI_News gets around 30 FoI requests per month. Perhaps @GeorgeFreemanMP could explain if that’s also too many, & what level of transparency & scrutiny he considers appropriate within an overall ~£20bn public research funding system?
More here from @CampaignFoI on the spurious arguments being deployed by government in support of what remains, as @Nature argues today, an indefensible position cfoi.org.uk/2021/06/campai… @EhsanMasood @Magda_Skipper
Far from reducing levels of legitimate public, journalistic & research community interest in the secretive processes of this new agency, these exemptions merely serve to heighten these—& undermine trust & confidence in the integrity & fairness of its decision-making.
Particularly at a time like this, when there’s been a succession of high-profile scandals over dodgy procurement processes, fraud & other flavours of corruption & nepotism in & around government. amp.theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
I know there are many across the UK research community who share these concerns. So in the absence of any response from government—and as the ARIA Bill now awaits Royal Assent—a few of us have teamed up to launch @ariawatch
We will support, amplify & encourage all efforts to make the UK’s newest research funding agency transparent, open & accountable. Contact us at hello@ariawatch.org if you want to get involved. More details soon… @ResFortnight @jgro_the @Stephen_Curry @EhsanMasood

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Wilsdon

James Wilsdon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jameswilsdon

Feb 2
A few quick thoughts on R&D aspects of the #LevellingUp white paper: #thread 1/
Overall, much to admire & digest. It’s a serious piece of work—& represents a welcome attempt to synthesise the evidence base on regional inequality & opportunity across the UK. 2/
On R&D aspects, the thrust of its conclusions seem sensible. Whether the recommendations will do much to shift the balance of R&D funding distribution is far more debatable…3/
Read 19 tweets
Jun 21, 2021
The ‘new’ Office for Science & Technology Strategy looks remarkably like the old OST, restored to its former base in the Cabinet Office: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of…
As well as a souped-up job title for @uksciencechief, this configuration presumably brings with it the current Govt Office for Science (from BEIS)—though the No.10 release is opaque on this point… gov.uk/government/new…
So the 50-year yo-yo between S&T policy in Cabinet Office and DTI/BEIS swings once more to the centre. This will please all those who believe in command-&-control science, but as @BBCPallab perceptively notes here, be careful what you wish for! bbc.co.uk/news/science-e… @jon_agar
Read 10 tweets
Jul 1, 2020
UK’s ‘R&D roadmap’ is published today by @beisgovuk. It reaffirms govt’s pledge to double public R&D investment to £22bn a year by 2025, and initiates a consultation on how this should be allocated gov.uk/government/new… (1/9)
Initial headlines: 300m fast-tracked for scientific infrastructure; new ‘Office for Talent’ based in No.10 to attract ‘top global science, research & innovation talent’; extension for PhD graduates’ right to live & work in UK to 3 years; & new Innovation Expert Group. (2/9)
But the real action is yet to come, as Roadmap triggers a ‘big conversation on what actions need to be taken & how’. Includes 8 ‘high level questions’ which will lead to a ‘comprehensive R&D plan’ as part of autumn Spending Review. (3/9)
Read 12 tweets
Apr 25, 2020
No.10’s response to the Guardian’s SAGE scoop - trying to downplay political advisers’ participation as routine - fails to address the fundamental point, as raised by @Sir_David_King, that this is far from normal. And he should know, as a former @uksciencechief.
It also contravenes the second of the government’s own principles of scientific advice to government - “scientific advisers should be free from political interference with their work” gov.uk/government/pub…
As regards Cummings in particular, there are echoes here of his other interventions in science policy. Talking to several scientists who attended No.10 meetings on S&I funding back in the summer/autumn, one striking aspect was the extent to which those present, who included
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(