We discovered a BIG, YouTube-based network spreading disinformation in India. The influencers - who were making money doing this - were fearless and had visible links with a political party.
What happened next?
Thread🧶
Disinformation can have disastrous consequences. Indian govt gets that. Which is why in the last two months, nearly 55 YouTube channels + several other SM accounts have been blocked.
Our work bore fruit around the same time that GOI announced its actions.
Let’s start from the start.
It was in late October that a mere YouTube search with terms like ‘Aryan Khan’, ‘NCB’ etc began showing us radical results.
Graph represents the volume of the overall content. Obviously, not all was disinfo.
Now, remember that top right corner on your YouTube page?
From there we were being recommended channel after channel – SEVERAL VERIFIED BY YOUTUBE – which were fanning the flames. Their videos, often monologues or in the form of interviews with ‘experts’ lasted for hours.
But that’s natural, no?
What wasn’t was this – their content was based on pure lies and baseless conspiracies.
Reason such unmasking matters is – these influencers were raking in big bucks, including from ordinary people. Masquerading such content as 'truth', by saying that they have ‘proof’ etc they sought money.
And we saw people paying. Yep.
On its part, YouTube has enabled monetisation tools like super chats, exclusive memberships, allegedly splitting ad revenue – all of it for people engaged in disinformation, abuse and ruining of reputations.
So what did we find? Well, it wasn't about Aryan Khan alone (though there was lots of it on him as well).
To begin with, this video will give you an idea.
Specifics now.
An influencer (left) featured who he claimed was a medical whistleblower working at AIIMS. The woman claimed to have seen corrupt practices in a probe that dealt with Sushant Singh Rajput’s death.
Video’s title? ‘BIGGEST PROOF’ of how AIIMS had 'botched up'.
Next stop AIIMS.
The spokesperson officially told a persistent @MedhaviArora that the woman had NOT worked in the relevant department, to begin with. And that it was a fake video.
It was watched over 16,000 times..remains on site.
Small point – in an interview he gave us, Sandeep Verma, influencer, insisted that the woman was a member of the probe team. He said he had verified her credentials.
When we asked for evidence he got upset, threatened action if we aired the clip. We aired it.
Was important.
Our team heard allegations of actors being involved in drugs, child prostitution, organ harvesting, anti-India and anti-Hindu activities – all unsubstantiated.
Yet presented as truth or a product of their ‘journalism’.
Acting like a network, we found these influencers starring in each other’s videos. They also had a common pool of so-called experts.
Pics👇
Remember I said these folks had ‘visible links with a political party’?
AFTER we came across these influencers and their content – which was heavily targeting Bollywood – we found some of their other works.
In a UP govt video, an ‘Elvish Yadav’ was invited to a virtual meet with UP CM Yogi Adityanath. He even asked the CM a question.
We came across a video by the same influencer where actors were abused and sexist remarks passed.
Video remains on YouTube.
CONTEXT: Above meet was ‘Social Media Samvaad’ where the CM was virtually addressing ‘team of important influencers which presented his government’s viewpoint strongly’.
CM said, “There are many things that the government cannot say directly but you do”.
BJP’s @Shehzad_Ind & Shweta Shalini featured with this influencer.
On checking, Shweta told @MedhaviArora that this interaction had nothing to do with the party.
Poonawala did not respond.
Must point out – we also noted how some of these influencers used hate speech for the BJP’s opponents.
We reached out to ALL the influencers and repeatedly, for months. We wanted to question them, seek their sources, if any.
Most did not respond.
Afterwards, some influencers misled their audience by claiming the BBC never asked them.
Totally false❌
Two influencers, Sandeep Verma and Sandeep Phogat did come forward to answer our questions.
“I keep my location on guard, people like me need to be careful. How about we rent a room in a hotel?” Verma said on WhatsApp.
Asked if he was making sensational and baseless videos for the money. He denied.
“I don’t hate Bollywood but I want cleansing”.
Phogat runs a verified YouTube channel and calls himself the ‘voice of normal people’.
When questioned about the baseless claims made in his videos, his response:
When you do 2-hour-long videos may be there are somethings you miss.
BOTH, upon asking whether they feared YouTube acting against them for the kind of content told us - THEY DID NOT.
And finally - what did YouTube do?
Worth pointing out that not only did we provide an exhaustive list of such influencers. We also asked the firm why peddlers of SUCH content were being provided features to monetise.
Why were influencers getting verified badges?
Excerpts from what a YouTube Spokesperson shared.👇
Must state - we asked YouTube twice, waited for their comments but they did not give us a specific response.
All these influencers continue their work.
How does all this impact the film industry?
Does it even?
Don’t want to sound alarmist, but it is very scary. Today, before the release of any show, production houses are deliberating on about what could be offensive, where there could be trouble and how to get around etc. Not how it should be.
Conti.
Shreemi: Some people think they’re safe because they’re doing certain movies. But history shows that nobody is safe. Bollywood needs to find unity..do something…talk to the lawmakers, gets laws amended.
This is not freedom of speech. You’re trying to curb fake news.
We also met @ReallySwara. She drew a direct line between such harmful disinformation and its impact on livelihoods.
"There is an impression in people’s minds about me and this has been formed more by noise around me than by my own actions.
I don’t get work as much. Ppl in industry get worried that if Swara came in there might be a controversy.
We also spoke to the Indian Motion Pictures Producers Asso (IMPPA). This is hurting even the workers in the industry.
On Jan 21, Secy @MIB_India Apurva Chandra asked everyone ‘tell us channels that are toxic’ and promised action.
He also said, “People like YouTube should also take this into account that these are toxic, fake news..and within their systems also these should get flagged".
How did we access the docs? Well, for months my colleague Arjun Parmar and I filed RTI applications with the relevant govt depts - State & Centre. Hundreds in fact. We then filed appeals, then filed second appeals..phew!
Background - this day last year, India had less than 600 cases and nine deaths. Some European & Latin American nations (with way higher numbers) had imposed lockdowns.
China, with thousands of deaths and cases by March 2020, never imposed a national lockdown.
JUST IN: Following months of unprecedented chill on the Line Of Control (LoC), things are now heating up. Earlier in the day, @OfficialDGISPR accused India of using 'cluster bombs' - an allegation denied by Indian Army as 'deceit' and 'deception'.
Indian Army: Pak army regularly attempts to push terrorists through infiltrations and opens up with multitude of weapons to assist them. India has maintained the right to respond. Such responses are only against military targets & infiltrating terrorists aided by Pak army.
On the other side of the LoC, the local govt ordered the defense committees to issue active and free arms licenses to the defense committees within five kilometers of LoC. 👇👇
EXCLUSIVE on @BBCHindi: Union Minister @jayantsinha tells me that BJP, members of the BJP and he - all of them bore the legal expenses to help lynching convicts get bail in the Alimuddin Ansari lynching case. Watch this space.
Do these images ring a bell?
Last summer when convicts in Alimuddin Ansari lynching case were granted bail by the Jharkhand High Court, they went to the residence of the minister from where these images emerged causing a furore.