Thread by @SethAbramson

(🔐) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: The National Security Implications of a Newly Discovered January 4 Trump International Hotel Meeting Are Well Beyond What the Washington Post Reported

I hope you'll read and RETWEET this. It expands considerably on WP reporting. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…

1/ I'm not going to be able to summarize this article. There's too much in it. The simple fact is that the Washington Post did a great job reporting on this secret January 4, 2021 meeting as breaking news—but didn't fully see the import of its own reporting. That is not a slight.

2/ The curatorial journalism at PROOF has resulted in a detailed timeline of the insurrection—who was with whom at what time and where. So when the Post suddenly reports on a January 4, 2021 meeting and tells us what was discussed in it and who was there, a whole timeline shifts.

3/ First, the Washington Post report has some significant implications for EDUARDO BOLSONARO and the possibility—now probability—that the January 6 conspiracy involved foreign collusion with the Brazilian government (which aimed to aid Trump and weaken its enemies in Venezuela).

4/ Second, the Post report has some significant implications for GINNI THOMAS, as it puts both her and her closest political associate (who she secretly worked with alongside Trump) *extremely* close to the January 6 conspiracy. Both Thomas and her compatriot must be subpoenaed.

5/ Third, the Post report has significant implications for the 2020 TRUMP CAMPAIGN that aren't mentioned in the report at all. PROOF—unlike the Post—has focused on the physical space at Trump International during Insurrection Week and who'd rented it/had control over its renting.

6/ Fourth, PROOF has been uniquely obsessed with the *teleconferencing* capacities at Trump International during Insurrection Week—and the Post report reveals something new about them that has significant implications for TRUMP HIMSELF that the report does not contemplate at all.

7/ Fifth, it's now clearer than ever that the January 6 conspiracy was as much an *intelligence operation* as a political one, and that Mike Flynn—who even *after* January 6 called for a coup—was at the heart of it. It won't be long before Erik Prince's role is also better known.

8/ In short, this Washington Post report fills a major hole in the insurrection timeline in a way that sends ripples throughout the entire timeline—but it takes independent curatorial journalists who've been networking thousands of major-media reports to explain the implications.

PS/ If you’re wondering whether PROOF info gets enough visibility, the article atop this thread confirms you needn’t worry—PROOF has had ~30,000 visitors in the ~20 hours since this article was published. For any curious about who follows PROOF’s research: sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-some-n…