The argument that "it was just a joke" doesn't wash. Yes, comedy can offend at times, it can push boundaries. We are talking about the attempted extermination of an entire people. How in holy hell is that "just a joke"? 1/
Currently the UK government is pushing legislation which would see the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities effectively criminalised. An entire culture criminalised and eradicated. 2/
Obviously that is not on the same level as what that Nazis did, but it does show how that hatred still exists. "Jokes" like Carr's normalise that hatred. They "legitimise" it. "Oh it's only a joke". It's a "joke" calling the mass murder of an entire people a joke. 3/
Holocaust denial is growing. The same views which ultimately led to it are being legitimised. We see anti-semitism being debated as if there is ever an acceptable form of it, "oh it isn't anti-semitism because...". 4/
We are seeing groups claiming that demonising the trans community and calling for them to be denied rights is in the name of "equality". It is relentless and Carr's "joke" is just part of it. 5/
It is the mainstreaming of hate. It is laughing at the murder of innocent people, and in doing so directly or indirectly saying that they "deserved it". If you call genocide a "positive" then what do you think people will take away from that now? It is not "just a joke". 6/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

Feb 3
Okay, now I know I definitely don't have the worst take on this whole mess, here's my theory. Mirza's resignation was "interesting", but it gives Johnson an out, very specifically. He can now properly retract his Savile comments, not that half-arsed attempt earlier. 1/
"Seen the error of my ways. Lost a close friend and trusted confidant because of this. Remorse, waffle, remorse, apology, let's move on". Meanwhile the deed is done and we are all talking about the Starmer/Saville comment and not Partygate and Mirza gets given a job elsewhere. 2/
It is a pure dead cat strategy, a strategy not uncoincidentally set out initially by Lynton Crosby, a man who, unlike Cummings likes to stay behind the scenes, and who was reportedly joining Johnson's team. Excuse me I just need to get some more string for my wall. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Feb 3
Thread: I am not a big fan of using the language of warfare in the context of asylum seekers. Too many people, particularly in the context of this thread, do that already, however, there is effectively a "hybrid war" being carried out against vulnerable people seeking safety. 1/
"Hybrid war", as a term, simplistically "entails an interplay or fusion of conventional as well as unconventional instruments of power and tools of subversion." Let's use the term "hybrid attack" in this context though to defuse some of the language. 2/

nato.int/docu/review/ar…
The use of State authorised force against asylum seekers is well documented. The UK at the moment for example is talking about deploying the navy to "combat channel crossings", but it is seen in many other ways. 3/
novaramedia.com/2022/01/18/the…
Read 19 tweets
Feb 1
The #BordersBill removing "for gain" in reasons for facilitating channel crossings isn't just about rescue operations. It means asylum seekers who steer boats can be prosecuted, even if they are not in anyway linked to a gang. It criminalises those seeking safety @UKHouseofLords.
Could someone please explain to Lord Green what population density means. Watching him trying to make out that the UK couldn't take more asylum seekers, despite taking substantially fewer, because it is "full" is just embarrassing.
Lord Griffiths making it clear that the two tier system for asylum seekers proposed in #AntiRefugeeBill would violate Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, basically the UK will be breaking international law and undermining a core principle of the global refugee regime.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
Thread: I use a lot of different things to help me appear "normal", for want of a better word, while also being comfortable and feeling safe being #actuallyautistic, which occasionally get confused with deliberately trying to look a certain way. 1/
This can have the unfortunate effect of some people thinking that I am essentially putting on a "performance". Well, I guess I am in a way, but not for attention. It is to try and fit in as best I can. 2/
I wear waistcoats, pretty much every day. They feel comfortable, they mean I don't have to worry about higher function tasks like ironing my shirt, more importantly for me though, they help to calm my anxiety by acting as a kind of deep pressure therapy. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 31
Yes she skewered him, but that isn't exactly hard under the circumstances. Can we please not go back down the route of lionising the architect of the hostile environment because she doesn't like the same person you don't like?
Blackford is not backing down here. This is something. In fairness, it is pretty clear that Johnson has lied and misled the house. Interesting way to slide around it by the Speaker, but Blackford definitely didn't withdraw his comment.
And Blackford is removed from the House. Tory MP's mocking, but that will resonate and I suspect looks better to the public who may not see that he has said anything wrong.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
"In full". Bloody hell Boris, even you can't pretend that was the full report
How do you need a report and investigation to "learn" not to have 16 parties while telling the whole country they shouldn't have a party? How can you be PM and still need to learn not to lie at the dispatch box?
Braying buffoons on the backbenchers showing that they really don't give a shit about rule breaking, ethics or what their constituents went through while following the very rules Johnson and his mates broke..
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(