Tweet

Steve W

Feb 8 • 8 tweets • 5 min read

@Jonathan_K_Cook

Excellent article by @Jonathan_K_Cook
on the chasm between reality and rhetoric on Starmer/Savile though I'd add:

Regarding the Levitt enquiry that cleared Starmer of involvement in the Savile debacle: Levitt wasn't at Mishcon de Reya at that time. /1

jonathan-cook.net/blog/2022-02-0…

She was employed (her Linkedin profile) at the CPS, so it's hard to see the 2012 Levitt enquiry as independent and avoid the opinion that the CPS cleared Starmer itself.

Incidentally Levitts Linkedin profile states she advised Starmer on "high profile charging decisions"!

/2

Now I don't know whether Levitt with her "high profile charging decisions" brief was there when the Savile case was at the CPS.

If not then her predecessor surely had the same brief? If so then the Savile case may well (should have?) ended up at the highest levels of the CPS? /3

And given that the role of "Principle Advisor to the Director of Public Prosecutions" is literally about advising the DPP (Starmer) then the highest levels of the CPS would surely mean Starmer?

Alison Levitt joined Mishcon de Reya in April 2014. Starmer followed in June 2014. /4

Alison Levitt is married to Lord Carlile who was intimately involved with the security state as Independent (appointed by Home Secretary) Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation from 2001-11.

Incidentally he shared an office with paedophile Cyril Smith MP. /5

heraldscotland.com/news/13158809.…

@KennardMatt

So Alison Levitt, who investigated Savile/CPS, may have some link with the security services via her husband?

Starmer definitely has (see interview of @KennardMatt by @Lowkey0nline)

MI5 have been accused of protecting paedophiles. What a murky world. /6

In short the whole "nothing to do with me" Starmer/Savile narrative should be viewed with scepticism and be the subject of journalistic enquiry, and not the outpouring of 4th Estate solidarity that was noticeably absent in relation to the attacks (literal & smears) on Corbyn. /7

Considering everything I believe that its not impossible:

-Keir Starmer knew of the Savile case.
-Savile wasn't prosecuted because it would damage too many establishment figures.
-Levitts enquiry cleared Starmer as he was too useful as DPP (going for Assange/clearing MI5). /8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @StevenGWalker74

Steve W

@StevenGWalker74

Nov 26, 2019

WHO IS CHIEF RABBI EPHRAIM MIRVIS?

1. Today he was the latest prominent "leader" of the "Jewish community" to indulge in attacks on the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn.

The question is simply whether or not Mirvis is someone in a position to be moralising to the nation?

2. First of all we'll consider his politicw. It's clear from this brown nosing of Johnson where Mirvis's political sympathies lie. Johnson apart from being a serial liar, also has quite a lengthy list of racist statements on his record. None of these seem to bother the Rabbi.

3. Some folks visit battlefields, or war museums on their holidays. Mirvis apparently likes to get in the odd war criminal. If Corbyn was pictured grinning with a man with as much blood on his hands as Netenyahu we can well imagine the uproar.

Read 8 tweets

Steve W

@StevenGWalker74

Nov 7, 2019

https://twitter.com/JewishChron/status/1192329662954901504

You can listen to this partisan hysteria (remember the JC's editor is Stephen Pollard who is on record as saying that no good can come from the left in any form), or look for more measured voices within the Jewish community such as Geoffrey Alderman: