4) Also, @Nexo has launched a campaign where they give 20% APY on $UST until March 1st.
I don't think they would have launched this campaign if Terra didn't have a plan for Anchor Protocol.
11/
5) A refill of the yield reserve would mean more time to work out a sustainable model for Anchor:
-More bAssets coming to Terra (bSOL/bATOM confirmed, and I'm sure there will be more)
This will increase the collateral = more staking rewards and more borrow = more income
12/
-Make a use-case for the $ANC-token in Anchor Protocol. Eg. if you want 19.5% interest you have to have X amount of $ANC in your wallet. If you don't have it, you get 15% APY.
-V2 model: can add several bAssets (eg. $SOL or $AVAX). More income and higher staking rewards
13/
If the Anchor rate is lowered, some people will flee from $UST to other opportunities --> Reduce mcap of UST and increase Luna supply = reduced Luna price
It's hard to say if this will happen to an extended degree or not, but it's one way to look at it
14/
Think of Anchor Protocol as a startup.
In my opinion, there is no way they would give up this project now, and I think the team knows very well that if they want more users and to grow faster they need to sustain the 19,5%.
15/
I do think Anchor Protocol will continue to grow no matter what, but an upfront cost of $100-450M seems small compared to the long-term benefits of faster growth, more users.
/16
They could continue to have almost zero marketing because their products are so good that no one can compete with them (word of mouth).
/17
Let's just end this thread with a poll.
Would you stay in Anchor Protocol if the rate was lowered to a variable interest rate, eg. 10% APY on average?
/18
If you liked this thread, I would love it if you could retweet the first tweet