Jikky Kij 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 8, 2022 14 tweets 7 min read Read on X
WHOA!!

60 days. SIXTY DAYS. And that was when they stopped looking...

That is how long these researchers were still detecting *mRNA* in lymph nodes.

Whoever told you "it degrades in hours to days" lied, because they didn't have that information.

Now we do. Image
I can't emphasise enough the importance of this.

You have mRNA producing spike protein (known to block p53-related tumour suppression at the nuclear level) for MONTHS after the treatment.

With NO off switch.
@fynn_fan @richardursomd @P_McCulloughMD

cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
Just a reminder of the Spike protein - p53/BRCA interaction here:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/
You really do not want to be producing p53-inhibiting spike protein in lymph nodes for months on end.

Why?

This is why
👇👇👇👇
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29885407/ Image
It's really not something you want to do.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… Image
Of course these are just "anecdotes"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… Image
If there is a cancer safety signal associated with spike protein therapeutics, it may well show up as lymphomas first.

Which makes this fact check somewhat interesting in its timing - November 2021
ibtimes.sg/fact-check-doe…
By the way, @CellCellPress is literally one of the most important and respected scientific journals in the world (unlike the disgraced @TheLancet and @NEJM).

This is no "it's just a preprint" paper. Image
Even Robert Malone, who tried to downplay David Wiseman's concerns about the unknown effects of pseudouridine and the 3'UTR in these therapies publicly two weeks ago, may have to change his mind after reading this paper.

rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-pub…
And for the trolls, please note that every paper referenced in this thread is on Pubmed, which is a government site.

If you don't like it, show rebuttal evidence instead of your usual stuff.

Thank you.
Love and peace.
#jikkyleaks
Apologies for those reporting being unable to open the full text.

PDF here. Let me know if the link breaks
cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092…
Er... @fynn_fan @Clucky92864053 this doesn't look great.
(BCL6) Image
And this seems to be the first paper to correctly use RNA-ISH to demonstrate mRNA presence, which is what the FDA, MHRA, EMA and TGA should have done (but didn't). Image
It's going to be important in the coming months to archive as many tweets as possible from those pushing this therapy onto people claiming it as "safe and effective" without any evidence to back up their claims.

Especially those linked with #modernagate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikky Kij 🐭

Jikky Kij 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JikkyKjj

Mar 6, 2022
If you think having a p53-inhibiting protein production factory at the very site of the body most affected by p53-related cancers is "nothing to worry about" you really haven't been paying attention

#modernagate #p53gate #spikegate
Read 13 tweets
Feb 24, 2022
The least-easy-to-remember hashtag on twitter appears to have gained steam. If you can't remember the whole thing just look for the #modernagate hashtag and you should find the other one #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
A quick recap because there are so many people on this platform covering for Moderna...

This is the GenBank entry in the patent database
Note the main author - S. Bancel (CEO of Moderna) who just said his "experts" are "looking into it" 🤔 Image
Here is the BLAST of #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG against LZ959695.1 (the Moderna entry)

You can reproduce it with this link (but expires in 24 hr) blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=… ImageImageImage
Read 10 tweets
Feb 23, 2022
For those following #covid19 corruption remember that Zerohedge broke the story of Pradhan's paper that showed manipulated Gp120 (HIV) inserts in the virus.

Then they were removed from the internet with Pradhan.

Who was responsible and how?
Step up Trevor Bedford, from the Fred Hutch Institute. The Fred Hutch are nominally a cancer research institute but suddenly developed a taste for viruses very recently.

They are the biggest recipient of funding from the NIH, who also fund Moderna. Image
So what did Trevor have to say?
Well, he did exactly what some other bad actors have done. Claimed that "the novel sequences found in #SARSCOV2" weren't "inserted" (in a lab) because they can be found on a BLAST search...
Read 15 tweets
Feb 20, 2022
BREAKING: A freedom of information request to the TGA (Australian version of the FDA) just released confirms that they had no idea how to assess an mRNA therapy product.

This is damning.

@Kevin_McKernan @SenatorRennick @Double_Christ Image
For context I will be posting the #jikkyleaks threads in this thread.

It's a thread of threads, but they all show that the process of approval was not fit for purpose.

Yet nobody said anything. They just took the fee and rubber stamped the approval

Read 11 tweets
Feb 7, 2022
WELL WELL...

Ed Holmes, who has just received a Congressional letter warning him to retain documents has been running cover for Peter Daszak & EcoHealth who covered up the origins of #SARSCOV2

And look who was helping him

Peter Doherty, Michael Worobey and Dominic Dwyer ImageImage
This is the document referred to but is just one of many puff pieces for the "Bat-Pangolin orgy" theory espoused by Daszak and his minions.

It's a horror show of propaganda
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
As an aside at this point, I don't recall that Michael Worobey (who is involved in this investigation) ever answer my little question..

Can't imagine why.

@chrismartenson

Read 11 tweets
Feb 6, 2022
From the Renz DOD data set... confronting data with more to come.

All health authorities will have data on pulmonary embolism rates for 2021 and should have raised the alarm.

But they haven't.

This is more than 10 standard deviations.
"Never event" level. Image
The DoD data is robust because the populations are stable and a stable proportion of medical events are recorded in their EMRs.

Defense doctors are the first port of call for defense personnel. Image
Irrespective of the underlying cause it was a complete abrogation of duty for the DoD to not investigate these "never event" signals.

Another event more than 10SD from the mean... Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(