Three pieces in @Telegraph today, two in @TheSun, and Jacob Rees-Mogg all cheerleading ‘gas, gas gas’ – during an energy price crisis caused by gas dependence, which increasing gas production cannot solve
The short version: gas extracted in British fields doesn't belong to Britain, it's owned by commercial companies who sell to the highest bidder. No way to change that except by export controls or public ownership - good luck with either of those
Production in UK would always be tiny compared to Russia etc who can and do manipulate supply and prices for political reasons
Put those two things together and it's blindingly obvious that increasing gas production in UK would make no difference to security of supply or price for British consumers
Bemoaning the low cost of gas in US is irrelevant - the gas market isn't entirely global yet, restricted by LNG infrastructure. If it were global (which it probably will be) US consumers would be paying the same as everyone else
This is a short-term price crisis that is going to hurt whatever options ministers take. Beyond this winter, cutting energy waste and adopting cheaper alternatives to gas is very clearly the way to go
If you don't believe me, ask Steve Holliday who ran National Grid for 12 years eciu.net/insights/2021/…
Seriously: drill baby drill? As Theresa May might put it: have you not been paying attention to facts; or have you not understood them; or have you decided facts are for little people?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: Something curious turns up in the gas statistics released this morning by government
Curious because at a time of eye-wateringly high gas prices, with Vladimir Putin at the Ukraine's door, with warnings of dire outcomes everywhere and the oil industry telling us that continuing UK oil and gas extraction is necessary for energy security ogauthority.co.uk/news-publicati…
...at a time when politicians like @RobertJenricktelegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/2… are urging 'us' to increase 'our production' of oil and gas to avoid exposure to internationally-sparked price hikes...
As we approach the final hours of #COP26, it's worth asking what impact it'll have on the UK
Firstly, the UK has finally hosted one of these things, 32 years after then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s call for a UN climate treaty margaretthatcher.org/document/107817. The UK has always had an important role in the process but hosting this summit makes the connection more visceral…
…especially as it comes at a time when public concern on climate change and support for a zero-carbon transition have never been higher - that's true globally too btw theguardian.com/environment/20…
First thing is, not that much has changed since the previous drafts - science, 'urgency', 'concern', request of Parties for new NDCs in 2022, adaptation finance, all still in - and placeholders still for long-term finance and implementation
Few big ones. Coal and fossil fuel subsidies still in, but in an expanded paragraph that also talks of advancing clean energy transition
THREAD: The UK government says it wants a successful #COP26. Great. But from the government’s position, the word ‘success’ has two distinct meanings
In one, #COP26 is a genuine success, making a meaningful contribution to tackling climate change. In the other, it isn’t a genuine success, but enough happens to allow Boris Johnson to claim that it is
Why flag this now? Because if Week 1 at #COP26 was about one thing, it was about news management. And there is doubtless a lot more to come
Now #COP26 is upon us it's noticeable how many political journalists are writing and broadcasting about it, which (speaking as a former science and environment hack who spent many hours inside the BBC arguing for climate change coverage across the board) is very welcome
But... something is going slightly awry, and I want to highlight it now before the serious stuff begins
This is not the UK's summit, nor @BorisJohnson's summit. Leaders of other nations will not set climate policies according to what he asks them to do. The most important consequence of failure to make progress will not be Boris Johnson's reputation