There’s a three-way tension at the heart of any No. 10 operation, between:
(a) good, strategic governance;
(b) day-to-day, urgent govt needs;
(c) electoral cycle/ shorter-term political imperatives.
A good PM masters it.
A terrible one means …
… huge trouble.
A 🧵/1.
Johnson or no Johnson, the three-way tug-of-war, which affects the whole of government, but is by far most acute in No. 10, militates against effective leadership in the interests of the whole country, while at the same time being fundamental to it in a democracy. /2.
Without sound, strategic governance, chronic - or even acute, catastrophic - failure of the entire country is inevitable.
Day-to-day urgent requirements are both distraction & necessity. Even with the best long-term governance, many & varied crises occur & must be managed. /3.
A Twitter masterclass in Churchillian national & global leadership.
By Alexander “Boris” The Great Malevolent Fraud. 1/n
No one warned me breaking the law was illegal.
2/n
No one warned me an illegal gathering in the garden was an illegal gathering in the garden. But I was only illegal for 25 minutes. So in a limited & specific way. Which, as Churchill wrote in the Magna Carta of the UK, is every PM’s right according to [fake Latin reference].
The problem we face is that the choice seems binary.
Incompetent vandals “running” the UK. Trashing its security, prosperity & well-being, with epic cluelessness.
Or an organised gang, doing the same, efficiently - for its narrow group advantage.
Is there a third way?
A🧵/1.
By now, there’s no safe way out.
Unless the party system is overridden. For the greater good.
The solution must happen fast. The scale of the damage being inflicted is great, & cumulative. The external political & security environment is deteriorating.
Time is short. /2.
That, of course means, Boris Johnson must go. And soon.
But no past or present member of the Johnson cabinet is acceptable as a replacement. Or as a cabinet minister. /3.
So Mr Johnson wants to stay on as PM even if he’s kicked out as Party leader.
Typical of the desperate solipsist.
But he has a point.
The Party can go hang, if he can command a majority in the House of Commons.
How would he achieve that?
A 🧵/1.
Given how distrusted & disliked he is: with a high degree of certainty, no way.
But imagine, just imagine, he had the integrity & insight to understand he’s been wrecking the country by pandering to an extremist minority (a majority of his MPs).
And that he has to stop it. /2.
If he ditched the extremists, & took around one third of his MPs with him to strike a deal with the opposition parties, he could be instrumental in creating a new government, right now, to save the country.
It’s pretty much impossible to see how he could remain PM. /3.