Haven’t seen such a gaslighting pretzel-twisting in all of COVID coverage. CDC removed the word immunity from the definition of vaccination and we are told that they didn’t do it why everyone sane knows they did it. Read this gaslighting “fact check.”
The C19 vaccines were sold as a dead-end to spread. But now that boosted people can also die of COVID, the CDC simply removed the word “immunity” from the vaccine definition since - they claim - no vaccine is 100% effective. So why wasn’t this change made 20 years ago?
There is a diff between “no vaccine is 100% effective” as the CDC mentions now, to huge portions of COVID-19 deaths being among the vaccinated. CDC knows that the C19 vaccines deliver less results than other vaccines but refuse to admit it outright while indirectly admitting it!
They indirectly admit it by changing the definition of vaccine from providing immunity to providing protection. When the change was caught and was used as more proof that the CDC knows the shortcomings of the C19 vaccines, the CDC teamed up with “fact checkers” to tell us:
‘We changed it simply because no vaccine is 100% effective and the word immunity suggests that it is 100%.’

If no vaccine is 100% effective where was the change of definition 20 years ago?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

Feb 13
@GOPLeader When @DevinNunes was onto this hoax in 2017, @SpeakerRyan benched him. Imagine if @HouseGOP had Devin’s back and if their two Russia investigations focused more on this. 2018, 2020 and Trump’s legislative agenda may have all been different!

Idiots are Republicans!
@GOPLeader @DevinNunes @SpeakerRyan @HouseGOP These revelations are many years too late and of less relevance.

The course of history was changed because your @HouseGOP choked the one member who saw it all early on. Then you clowns kept saying “let Mueller finish his job,” when his existence delayed accountability for ‘16!
@GOPLeader @DevinNunes @SpeakerRyan @HouseGOP I don’t need faux GOP outrage years late and when it matters less.

Republicans did the same with COVID rules: You coward in the corners 12-18 months ago when your voices would have mattered and when data was readily available. Now when Dems/some media change, you speak up too.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 28
1/ Your vaccine fanatic friend is too stupid to understand this thread, and your authoritarian government official is too power hungry to want the masses to understand it, which is why they both yell “vaccine disinformation.” It’s easier than to debate on merit, but please focus.
2/ California posted a chart that in late Dec 2021 into Jan 2022, “unvaccinated people were 16.9 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than full vaccinated people.”

The math you can see in the bottom: 6.5 is 16 times more than 0.4.

Please take a moment to observe the chart. Image
3/ On a similar basis, NYC shows you that recent deaths among the unvaccinated is around 30 times higher than among the vaccinated. 37.4 deaths vs 1.2 is multiple times higher.

Here again, please observe the attachments before reading the next tweets. ImageImage
Read 11 tweets
Jan 28
Massachusetts averaged 63.38 COVID deaths over the 7 days ending with Jan 22nd (first chart). This is 443 COVID deaths in 7 days.

In the same 7 days (second chart), MA added 275 VACCINATED Coronavirus deaths!

275 is 62.0% of 443.

Source: mass.gov/info-details/c…
State of CT added 748 Coronavirus deaths in the last almost-4 weeks (first two charts).

In the same time, the state added 235 VACCINATED Coronavirus deaths (last two charts).

235 is 31.4% of 748.

Late Dec data: portal.ct.gov/-/media/Corona…

Late Jan data: portal.ct.gov/-/media/Corona…
From 8/25/21 through 1/5/22, Vermont’s COVID deaths rose from 273 to 482. This is 209 deaths.

In the same time, the state had 116 breakthrough (vaccinated) COVID deaths.

116 is 55.5% of 209.

Vermont’s website: healthvermont.gov/covid-19/curre…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27
The “misinformation” on @joerogan’s show is largely government-sourced data and debates/discussions around it.

It’s journalism (data) combined with punditry (conversation), but the panicked masses are doing the work for those with a vested interest in one COVID outcome.
The more you try to move the needle on this all, the more you see that those with a vested interest in a certain outcome backed by a pancaked masses, are not interested in journalism, fairness or in your healg. They want their money, power and want you crushed. Simple.
Dems cheered on Mueller, Manhattan DA and the NY AG as they went after Trump in ways never done to any POTUS for such garbage. Same attitude is also to Jan 6th.

You think Social Media companies who rake in money from big companies, care to be seen as impartial? For whom/what?
Read 12 tweets
Jan 26
“Milder” Omicron left more people newly dead of COVID this week in highly-vaccinated NY than the same week last year when vaccinations were only getting started.

Yet, there is a refusal to also focus on healthy living, therapeutics and better hospital capacity/access.
When sane people see the above numbers, they understand that jabs/masks alone are not cutting it and therefore the 3 basics mentioned above need to be focused on too.

Vaccine fanatics, however, see the above data as proof that we just need to vaccinate/masks/lockdown some more.
Canada’s daily new COVID deaths is more than the same week last year.

“That’s because Omicron is more contagious.”

Ok, if a highly-vaccinated country ends up with the same number of new daily deaths as a year ago pre-vaccines, they need more/diff steps than what’s done now.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 23
Cons are giddy because Bari Weiss acknowledged the shortcomings of cloth masks (12 months after it was obvious), and that she said asymptomatic people wave vaxx passes (wrongly suggesting that being vaxxed can’t mean symptomatic).

See thread of stuff that should be mainstream:
Bari and @billmaher only nibble around at partial edges of things that anyone outside corperate PR (“media”) should have yelled about 6-12 months ago and they indeed did so at the risk of bans. Many were indeed banned! Please read the thread above of things that are basics!
As @julie_kelly2 noted, she owns @bariweiss nothing to applaud Bari for nibbling around the edges of things that are obvious for 6-12-18 months, while Bari has yet to adapt broader COVID-related points that are known for anyone that follows data/logic as threated here:

🔻🔻🔻🔻
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(