The six new nuclear power plants (9 GW) in Macron's plan grab the headlines, but the impressive renewables part is way bigger in terms of annual production.
40 GW of offshore wind,
20 GW of onshore wind,
100 GW of solar PV,
biomethane. lesechos.fr/industrie-serv…
An enormous renewable energy plan, with replacement, and lifetime extension where possible, of aging nuclear capacity, as @RonnieBelmans says:
Same version here in the Netherlands: "Macron fully bets on nuclear power to meet climate target" nos.nl/l/2416671
Just to be sure: I did the math, that's why I could tweet that the annual energy production is way higher. Just that wind and solar will produce more than 40 GW of nuclear would do, even at 8,000 full load hours (much higher than usual in France). And then there's the biomethane.
And overall, I'd say French nuclear power production will go down under these plans, since more capacity will retire than will be built.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ouch. Look at the enormous difference between Dutch and German average home insulation: the Dutch ones lose 2.4 times as much heat as the German ones!
(OK, it's probably not a scientific conclusion, since it depends on where tado° sold its thermostats, but a sample of 80,000 homes is pretty impressive)
Any more details, @tado?
The source for that story on German Lufthansa carrying out 18,000 unnecessary flights to protect its landing rights: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of 23 December. Thread. faz.net/aktuell/wirtsc…
Lufthansa CEO Spohr: in our winter timetable, we had to cancel 33,000 flights due to lack of demand. "But we have to carry out another 18,000 unnecessary flights this winter, just to keep our start and landing rights. ..
While climate-friendly exception regulations have been found in almost all other parts of the world, the EU does not allow this in the same way. That's bad for climate and the opposite of the aims of the EC's #Fitfor55 program."
The December average of atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa was 416.7 ppm, that's 2.45 ppm higher than last year. Overall, still speeding in the wrong direction!
The 2021 average of atmospheric CO2 measured at Mauna Loa was 416.45 ppm. That's 2.21 ppm higher than last year, and 24.6 ppm higher than ten years before.
The increase in atmospheric CO₂ concentration will slow down once we reduce emissions. And concentration will start to go down sometime before we reach net-zero. This article says: once we reduced emissions by ~70% (carbonbrief.org/explainer-will…)
The gas extraction from the Dutch Groningen field this winter will be 3.7 billion m³ higher than announced before.
That's less than the space left empty in Dutch gas storages this summer (over 6 billion m³). For commercial/tactical reasons, only 60% of their capacity was filled.
I keep reading that one of the reasons that more gas will be extracted from the Groningen field is that the construction of a nitrogen* factory near Zuidbroek is delayed. But nowhere it says by how much, and compared to what time schedule.
Now we'll finally have our new government in the Netherlands (ETA 10 January), with a Minister for Climate and Energy from the @D66 party, I'm rereading the Climate & Energy part of the coalition agreement (kabinetsformatie2021.nl/binaries/kabin…)
Thread.
"We strive for the #ParisAgreement goal of max. 1.5°C warming". Good!
"We will raise the 2030 emission reduction goal from -49% to -55%. That's a firm commitment, and to make sure we achieve it, we'll aim our policies at -60% by 2030." Smart thing to do.
"We will also aim for -70% by 2035 and -80% by 2040. For that, we will make preparations to introduce road pricing and to build nuclear power plants."
Road pricing is long overdue, imo.