Fairly decent press pack awaiting the four Quad Foreign Ministers in Melbourne after their meeting today. Not a huge amount of social distancing! Excerpts to follow 1/
The principals are here. Payne opens by stressing the importance of “rules” and “fair play” in the Indo-Pacific. Mentions coercion and uses Morrison’s formulation of a “world order which favours freedom” 2/
Jaishankar calls the Quad a “vibrant” framework. Stresses ASEAN centrality. He says they reviewed efforts to provide vaccines and says they agreed to “expedite” it 3/
Blinken runs through a long list of Quad initiatives. Repeats that it is an “affirmative” partnership 4/
First question is on Ukraine. Payne doesn’t go into the details of discussions today. Blinken says Russia will face “massive consequences” if it invades. Won’t be drawn on what actions he might like Australia to take 5/
When Blinken says (emphatically) “what happens in Ukraine matters here” a ghost of a smile flickers over Jaishankar’s face. It was unmistakable. I don’t pretend to know what he was thinking 6/
I ask about Myanmar and whether Blinken presses other Quad countries to apply sanctions on the junta. Blinken doesn’t really say, but reasserts the US position. He says there was a “robust” discussion on the subject 7/
Question on the Russia and China joint statement. Payne says it is “concerning because it doesn’t represent a global order which squares with ambitions for openness and sovereignty” 8/
Jaishankar doesn’t want to drawn. Stresses important of cooperation but when it comes to the Quad “we are for something not against something” 9/
Listening back to my tape (which is not great quality) I think Jaishankar actually said “we are for something not against someONE" which is even more pointed 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Indian External Affairs Minister @DrSJaishankar giving a speech at @UniMelb ahead of the Quad Foreign Ministers meeting this afternoon. I’ll tweet a few excerpts 1/
Jaishankar says the India-Australia relationship is much closer - it is "dramatically changing right in front of my eyes." Says India is growing in strength and its interests are widening - "I speak to you on behalf of a country which has clearly moved up the global ladder" 2/
Jaishankar stresses common interests and both countries then wraps up. Now questions. @Lisa_Singh asks him about his formulation that (in India) "nationalism leads to greater internationalism” 3/
OK! Kurt Campbell- "Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Tsar"- is addressing a @LowyInstitute conference. The conference title is "the Indo-Pacific Operating System." Plenty of people like this phrase, but I think it's a little clunky. Anyway, should be interesting. I'll live tweet 1/
Good first question from @mfullilove - "what will it take the United States to break free and really develop an economic strategy for the region?" Campbell says elements of the new strategy are taking shape and "we want to take quick action moving forward" 2/
A brief (and not very original) comment: the Administration has *lots* on its plate but we are almost one year into Biden's first term and the Administration is only now in "the early stages of articulating" the strategy - so yep, they need to move quickly! 3/
Hmmmm. Thread. China's Foreign Affairs Ministry says that several countries - including Malaysia - joined its criticisms of AUKUS at the IAEA Board of Governors Meeting last week. Trying to track down records of the meeting to verify if this is true 1/
There's a fascinating diplomatic tussle at the IAEA over this. China argues the transfer of nuclear submarine technology will undermine the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and is pressing the IAEA to set up a "special committee" to scrutinise the issue 2/
Unsurprising, Australia and the UK/US are pushing back firmly on this. Australia's Ambassador in Vienna (and rep to the IAEA) @AusAmbVIE says the Chinese proposal "appears intended to politicise this issue" (no kidding) 3/
The French Ambassador to Australia is giving an address to the National Press Club. The speech has been widely described as "highly anticipated" which is a) a terrible cliche and b) entirely true. I'll live tweet excerpts of the speech and the Q+A 1/
The Ambassador begins by describing the future submarine program which was scrapped by Australia. He says the program was "unprecedented" and a hugely significant expression of trust because it involved the sharing of technology which was a "core national defence capability" 2/
The Ambassador now describes the "stab in the back." He says only Australia intentionally deceived France because it wasn't sure the AUKUS submarine deal would come to fruition. He points out only weeks before the 2 + 2 reaffirmed the importance of the program 3/
Marise Payne heading to Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia (new ASEAN chair) and Vietnam. Top issues on the list: AUKUS and nuclear subs, Myanmar, the Australia-ASEAN CSP and (of course) the pandemic recovery abc.net.au/news/2021-11-0…
Meanwhile, this issue might pop up when Senator Payne is in Cambodia. Hun Sen is demanding Australia send its promised COVID-19 vaccines ASAAP, warning that if we don't deliver he will (wait for it, you'll be shocked) approach China instead
Full article here. The two million vaccines promised are from the UNICEF purchase which we are still trying to line up. But supply issues = delays smh.com.au/world/asia/cam…
Right! I'll be live tweeting @dfat#estimates today. There is a Frances Adamson shaped absence in the room, which is quite strange. The new(ish) @dfat Secretary Kathryn Campbell is making her first appearance in the role. Will be interesting to see how she goes 1/
Payne gives an opening statement. First off she hails the new Australia-ASEAN comprehensive strategic partnership, which he calls a "significant milestone." Here's my story on this from earlier this morning 2/ abc.net.au/news/2021-10-2…
Wong is grilling officials about handling of the AUKUS / nuclear subs announcement. Why were the Indonesians briefed so late? She asks senior official Justin Hayhurst what DFAT's advice was. She says she wants to know if their advice was bad or whether it was ignored (ouch) 3/