As @nytimes latest podcast shows, there was no plot and the media failed to ask basic questions around the letter and its origins.
Lives ruined. Communities slurred. Will newspapers and broadcasters apologise?
As @OborneTweets has argued; “With few exceptions, journalists failed to examine the underlying facts while repeating what turned out to be false allegations.”
The investigation by @samirashackle in @gdnlongread states,“It is hard to imagine these kinds of stories garnering such levels of media attention had they not involved Muslim staff or pupils.”
There were/are many who doubted the narrative of a “plot” or the “Islamisation” of schools under the guise of #trojanhorseaffair.
This is an example of how they were viewed by 'journalists', whilst being subject to "cancel-culture" by others.
Research @cfmmuk shows that from 2014 to 30 May 2017 there were 944 articles on "Trojan Horse and Birmingham." Since @educationgovuk case collapsed there have been 135 mentions with no substantial exploration into why evidence was "deliberately withheld." bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
The co-author of a major investigation into the #trojanhorseaffair told @cfmmuk how basic questions such as how a school could actually be “taken over”, were not asked, whilst the community of Alum Rock, #Birmingham was pathologised.
Even when @BBCRadio4 broadcast a 3 episode #corrections programme, it failed to put right “shocking falsehoods” in #trojanhorseaffair. It was enough that someone made a claim about an alleged incident for it to be taken as a fact.
Framing operates as a shorthand. As @cfmmuk report on British Media’s coverage of #Muslims showed, references to the #trojanhorseaffair function within media reports as an index for ‘extremism’ and ‘religious intolerance’.
The media took the #trojanhorseaffair beyond #Birmingham. In 2018, four right-wing British newspapers, were forced to pay damages to two #Muslims who they accused of enacting a “Trojan Horse” plot in a school in #Oldham
So far reviews of the revelations by @BriHReed & @HamzaMSyed have mostly glossed over British Media falsehoods. A damning indictment of how narratives and tropes were perpetuated to feed a story of moral panic.
The @MuslimCouncil are right to call for an inquiry into this #trojanhoax. The role of the British media and its willingness to accept and perpetuate the aims of anti-Muslim actors and officials should also be looked into.
1/10 🧵After the Bondi Beach attack, #British TV coverage repeatedly blurred the line between terrorism & #Muslims whilst framing the attack around #Palestine solidarity & slogans like 'Globalise the #intifada.'
@cfmmuk examines some of these failures👇
#MediaBias #Gaza
2/10 The now predictable @TalkTV framed most of its discussions to “Muslim communities”, “Islamic culture” and “Muslim values”, shifting blame from a violent fringe group to #Muslims as a collective.
3/10 Some suggest #ISIS violence flows naturally from Islam . #Islam is framed as the problem not extremist ideology and described as "a cult" with #Muslims accused of having a code of protection. You couldn't say this about any other community on British TV. @Ofcom
1/10 In light of the hooliganism involving #MaccabiTelAviv supporters, a reminder of how some of the worst examples from UK media framing @WMPolice decision to ban away fans from the @AVFCOfficial game.
A thread of some examples from British based broadcasters. 🧵
@Ofcom ???
2/10 After suggesting that the notoriously violent #Maccabi fans weren't violent, @SkyNews presented Andrew Fox a well known propagandist for Israel, as a regular @AVFCOfficial fan.
Note how @Novara found how Fox was among those who suggested #Israel should target more journalists
3/10 GB News allowing a #Maccabi supporter to claim that 5-10 percent of #Birmingham's #Muslims are extremists?
No challenge to this unsubstantiated, random claim just a nodding head
1//9 A thread on @BBCNews coverage of the murder of Al Jazeera journalist #AnasAlSharif & colleagues 🧵👇
Bulletins often opened with “#Israel says”. @cfmmuk found since his killing, “Israel says/claims” appeared 54 times in BBC TV & radio bulletins.
2/9 This isn’t just word choice. “#Israel says” puts an unverified claim — that #AnasAlSharif was a Hamas operative — first, before facts.
Context that he once worked in #Hamas-run media is added, but near Israel’s claim it risks implying past links justify killing him.
3/9 This @BBCNews par opens with “Israel says…”, leading with an unverified claim before facts, condemnations & legal context. Even with “little evidence” later, the first frame sets the tone—tilting the story toward the military narrative.
3/7 "Allahu Akbar" means "God is greater" in Arabic. Muslims say it in prayer, celebration, and everyday life.
When a likely non-Muslim man says it during a violent act, it still seems to heighten media interest despite the man shouting many other slogans such as anti-Trump rhetoric.
📢 NEW REPORT:
A year-long analysis of BBC coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza reveals a pattern of bias, double standards & silencing of Palestinian voices.
Despite 34x more Palestinian deaths, Israeli fatalities received 33x more coverage per death.
Humanising stories:
BBC ran nearly the same number of victim profiles for Palestinians (279) & Israelis (201) — despite 34 times more Palestinian deaths.
📣 Emotive language like “slaughter” & “massacre” was used 4x more often for Israelis.
#MediaBias #BBCGazaCoverage @BBCNews
🎙️ Whose voices count?
The BBC interviewed:
🔹 2,350 Israelis
🔹 1,085 Palestinians
GB News reporting here on local opposition to a Muslim burial site being built in Farnham. The journalist focused the story on 'concerns around Muslim practices of body storage', as reported by "local press". These reports don't exist. Is GB News manufacturing moral outage?
The 1st interviewee, an activist in Farnham, dismissed GB News' line of questioning, referring instead to concerns around congestion and the environment, not body storage.
A 2nd interviewee was then brought on to discuss the "difference between a Muslim burial and a normal Christian one". The interviewee was then asked about "local concerns about [unrefrigerated] bodies" and whether it is "legal in the UK to store an [unrefrigerated] body for 24hr"