For the past few weeks, America has been debating whether or not the NFL is racist because they don't hire Black head coaches. So I wondered: Could an actual economist help @theGrio answer this question?
Luckily, I know a guy.
A thread:
Of couse, the most obvious question is: How does one define racism? Is it when someone hates someone of another race? Must the definition include intent or is it the RESULT of an action or a system?
Fortunately, I found the answers in a very obscure book called a "dictionary"
Cool, so all we have to do is show that the NFL used race as a fundamental determinant in how they chose coaches, or:
That the NFL systemically oppresses one racial group to the social, economic or political advantage of another
Or that the NFL is a system founded on Racism...
Well, the last one was easy. See, in 1933, NFL teams (5 of which are still owned by the same families) banned Black players.
Of course, people would argue that the NFL stopped being racist after Black sportswriters pushed this issue and the NFL allowed Black players again.
Instead of arguing that no one wanted to watch a bunch of white boys play football, I decided to look at the hiring statistics of the NFL. And, because of my training in wypipology, I figured that people would object if I included the part of history when the NFL WAS racist.
So I decided to compare the NFL stats of Black coaches vs. white coaches AFTER 1989, when the Oakland Raiders made Art Shell the first Black head coach in the modern era.
There was one problem: The statistic didn't exist (At least I couldn't find it).
If you look closely at the racial data for the NFL (or most corporations), you'll see that it's really the data for "people of color." Nowadays, ANYONE is a "person of color." I've had a white woman from Europe argue that she is a person of color because she "didn't feel white."
FOr instance, the NFL's last occupational report says that 11 people hired since 2012 were coaches of color. While that seems abysmal, that number includes Ron Rivera, whose mother is Puerto Rican and father is Mexican. It also includes Robert Saleh, who is Lebanese American.
This doesn't mean that these groups don't experience discrimination. But in this case, it was not relevant to me because of 1 fact:
The NFL's labor force isn't 70% "people of color." 70% of the NFL's players are BLACK. I wanted to know how its coaching ranks could be so white.
So I downloaded the stats of every coach who ever coached in the NFL, but only looked at the 132 white coaches & 20 Black coaches who coached teams since 1989.
For coaches already coaching in 1989, I didn't include their stats because they were hired when the NFL WAS racist.
Now that doesn't mean that there were only 132 job openings. Some coaches were hired 2 or 3 times. I also didn't include interim coaches because they weren't technically "hired"
I wanted to know if the failures of other Black coaches were unfairly used against Black candidates
I can tell you without question that the NFL owners are NOT guilty of that kind of insipid racial stereotyping. How do I know that?
Well here is what I found:
By nearly every statistical measure, the NFL's Black coaches have outperformed white coaches.
They have a slightly lower winning percentage but they make the playoffs more often, they are more experienced when they are hired, & win slightly more games per season.
Yet despite winning as much or more than white coaches, they are usually fired before their fifth season
In a league that's 70% Black, Black coaches make up 11% of the hires since 1989.
And they're not just the 1st hired, they're the 1st fired.
A quarter of the Black men who ever coached in the NFL were fired after winning seasons. 97% of white men who did this kept their jobs.
Here's the craziest one, though: In the history of the NFL, only 12 times has a coach been fired after reaching the playoffs twice in the previous 5 years.
10 of them were Black.
In fact, the playoff appearance rate of .396 means THE AVERAGE Black coach accomplishes this.
Oh, the 2 white men weren't actually fired. In both cases, they "agreed to part on mutual terms."
1 of the reasons the overall winning percentage for white coaches is slightly higher might be that, not only do white men get to coach longer, they get 2nd & 3rd chances*
Now, you may be wondering, in a league that's 70% Black, where do they find these white boys to coach? Well, here's the thing:
If you're white, you just ask your daddy.
One of the reasons the coaching ranks are so white is because white coaches put their kids on staff.
Seriously, one-third of the NFL's current head coaches are related to a former or current head coach. The Rams coach (the youngest head coach ever) is the grandson of a former 49er GM, now led by the son of a former Broncos coach whose new head coach's dad coached for 8 teams
Maybe that's why they are young. Or maybe it's because 92% of GMs are white. Or maybe it's because–and this tripped me out–you don't even have to play in the NFL or coach in the NFL...Or college!
20% of white coaches have never played pro or college football.*
*The grafx's old
MOST Black coaches since 1989 have played in the NFL. This was admittedly easy to research since, out of the more than 10,000 Black men who played in the NFL, only 20 Black men have ever been hired to coach a team
Let’s be clear, I’m not calling ANY of these people racists. Neither would CRT. In fact, the entire discipline of CRT doesn’t even concern itself with racist individuals.
But there has also been 120 SCOTUS justices in the history of the country…
First you gotta understand how Jim Crow even started. In the election of 1876, Southern whites claimed the election was stolen. Southern states (& racist Oregon) filed lawsuits, claiming the areas where black voters cast ballots were fraudulent.
Sound familiar?
To settle the dispute, a bunch of white men got together and certified the election for Rutherford B. Hayes in exchange for allowing the South to treat black people however they wanted, with no interference…
First of all, many of the people who make this argument usually live in cities where you can easily obtain an ID.
In some cities, especially rural places, there is literally no place to get an ID in the town. I grew up in a town with one taxi company & no public transportation
The DMV was in the county seat, which was actually SMALLER than my town. It was open from 8-5 & ALWAYS crowded. People would literally line up at 5 AM to take the DL test
Someone who can't afford a car has to lose a day's work and PAY SOMEONE to get ID
But I wake up late, race to the airport & make it on the plane. My seat is in the middle of the plane, right where they keep those carts. I notice the lady in front of me looks kinda like the vampire plane lady ( or at least the one in my dream). Plus, she figured out a finesse:
Because we’re in overlapping cart territory, she basically has 2 different l flight attendants serving her. & she’s sucking down bottles of Sutter Home the way I imagine the Kardashians would do if they were vampires and found a bar that serves locally-grown Black people’s blood.
I’m not really paying attention and I have on noise canceling headphones. But I notice people looking in my directions & turn on transparency mode.
The lady’s making guttural noises & twitching. They ask if she’s feeling ok but I’m like “this mf finna go full vampire!”
10. It protects Section 2 of the VRA, which was recently dismantled when the SCOTUS decided I Brnovich v DNC that Arizona Republicans could essentially outlaw the voter registration tactics of the civil rights movement
Vote suppressors have studied & exploited the VRA’s language that outlaws “violations to the 14th and 15th Amendment”
This bill prohibits the violation of ANY law that protects voters.
Only people who want to discriminate would oppose that.
8. It restores preclearance.
Shelby v Holder dismantled the part of the VRA that required places with a history of voter suppression to check with the DOJ before changing voting laws & rules.
SCOTUS instructed Congress to come up with a new formula. The new formula says:
First of all, he’s right Houston ISD has a higher dropout rate than Cypress Fairbanks ISD. It’s true when you compare any poor school district with a school district with a bunch of richer people. It’s not because of race, it’s because of poverty.
CyFair ain’t even that white, it’s just a lot wealthier. But when you look at the median income of people who live in the school district, they make WAAY more than people who live in Houston ISD. Even the Black people there make $20k on average more than the average Black Texan
Now compare Houston ISD, where white people are the ONLY group above the median income for Texas. Now, this doesn’t exactly prove that economics affect education, we’ll get to that, because there’s something else you should know: