Seeing a lot of the usual talk about whether Rudy Giuliani will “grow a conscience” by testifying to the 1/6 committee and whether this will make him “good” or “bad” and whether he can be “trusted.” But this is gibberish. It’s about Rudy selfishly saving himself, nothing more.
The ONLY factor here is whether Rudy has concluded he has to sell out Trump world in order to stay out of prison. If yes, then he can be trusted to selfishly give up crucial evidence and truthful testimony. Not because he’s now “good” but because he’s as selfish as ever.
On the other hand, if Rudy still thinks he can skate without having to give up Trump, then he’ll try to bullshit the committee.
It’s really as simple as that. All this talk about who’s good or bad, who’s going to grow a spine or a conscience, or who can be trusted, is a child’s view of things. The only factor is whether Rudy has concluded that he has to give up Trump in order to save himself.
The courts just recently gave the DOJ most of the evidence it seized from Rudy’s home (yes, the courts work that slowly). Rudy had tried and failed to suppress it via attorney client privilege claims. It bought him time, but he ultimately lost.
So Rudy will almost certainly go down for the dirty foreign money stuff, whether or not they get him for 1/6 and election stuff. Not much question about that.
The question is whether Rudy UNDERSTANDS he’s going down, or whether he delusionally still thinks he can somehow magically get away with it all. These decisions often come down to whether someone understands they have no way out but to flip.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

Feb 15
Now that Rudy Giuliani is fully cooperating with the 1/6 committee, we’ll hear the usual talk about whether he can be “trusted” to do the right thing. But that’s irrelevant. Giuliani CAN be trusted to do the selfish thing, which is what this comes down to.
palmerreport.com/analysis/what-…
When you look at the recent court ruling in the DOJ’s ongoing criminal case against Giuliani, it’s clear he’s going to prison for taking dirty foreign money, whether or not he goes down for 1/6 and election crimes.

The question is whether Rudy understands he’s going to prison.
If Rudy understands that that he’s already a lock for federal prison, then yes, he can be trusted to do the selfish thing of saving himself by selling Trump out to the 1/6 committee and the DOJ. It’s not about him doing the right or wrong thing. He’ll do the selfish thing.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 15
Donald Trump’s longtime accounting firm says his last decade of financial statements can’t be relied upon, drops Trump Org as a client. This gives banks a perfect excuse to call in Trump’s loans, take his assets before New York state does. It’s all coming crashing down now.
Notable: Mazars sent this letter to Trump a fees days ago, and the New York AG already has it. Suggests Mazars cc’d it to her, which in turn suggests Mazars is already fully cooperating with the NY probe into Trump.
Also notable: the New York AG almost immediately filed this letter with the courts, making it public right away instead of strategically waiting for anything. It ensures Trump’s lenders and creditors know about it.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 13
If the 1/6 committee has to give immunity to a few mid-level Trump people in order to take Donald Trump down, then do it. Just coordinate with the DOJ so that it's done right.

The pundits yelling "bad idea!" are just trying to make themselves look smarter than the 1/6 committee.
These are the pundits who always bash the 1/6 committee for not being "aggressive" enough. Then when the committee considers an aggressive move, these same pundits always bash that idea. They automatically bash any move the committee does or doesn't make. It's just their brand.
If the committee gives immunity to Eastman, these pundits will say it should have been given to Clark instead.

If the committee gives immunity to Clark, these pundits will say it should have gone to Eastman instead.

It's an automatic rejection of the committee's every move.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
House Republican Nancy Mace kissed Trump’s ass, and he’s still endorsing her far right primary challenger. When are these idiots going to learn that for Trump, loyalty is a one way street 😆
Also, while Mace’s district does lean Republican, her seat was previously occupied by a Democrat. If Trump’s far right candidate takes out Mace in the Republican primary, the Democrats *may* be able to pick up that seat.
It’s a reminder that by endorsing non-viable Republican candidates who are personally loyal to him, Trump is actually helping the Democrats in the midterms. He knows this, he just doesn’t care. He’s that desperate to remain relevant in the Republican Party.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 10
When you put Maggie Haberman's fictional reporting about Hillary Clinton's email scandal within the context of her decision to sit on the fact that Donald Trump was flushing documents down the White House toilet, you can ALMOST argue that Haberman criminally conspired with Trump.
Trump committed a crime. Haberman knew about it but failed to report it or tell the authorities, which means at the least she helped cover it up. Now it turns out she sat on her knowledge of Trump's crimes so she could personally profit from it with a book long after the fact.
Given that when Haberman learned about Hillary Clinton's handling of documents, she swiftly reported it AND falsely characterized it as having been a crime, she can't now argue that she had legitimate journalistic reasons for sitting on the information about Trump's actual crime.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 10
The Matt Gaetz probe is a good guidepost for how this DOJ operates. It’s painstakingly flipped three inside witnesses against him – nearly guaranteeing a conviction. But it still hasn’t even publicly acknowledged the Gaetz probe exists, and likely won’t until he’s indicted.
The existence of the Gaetz probe only became public knowledge when Gaetz himself decided to go public about it, after someone in his life allegedly tried to extort him over it. If Gaetz hadn’t done this, we might still not know he’s under DOJ investigation.
When Greenberg cut a deal, his lawyer told the media he was cooperating against Gaetz. When Ellicott cut a deal, his lawyer did the same. It’s not clear who leaked the ex girlfriend testifying and getting immunity. But none of this appears to have come from the DOJ itself.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(