Now that Rudy Giuliani is fully cooperating with the 1/6 committee, we’ll hear the usual talk about whether he can be “trusted” to do the right thing. But that’s irrelevant. Giuliani CAN be trusted to do the selfish thing, which is what this comes down to. palmerreport.com/analysis/what-…
When you look at the recent court ruling in the DOJ’s ongoing criminal case against Giuliani, it’s clear he’s going to prison for taking dirty foreign money, whether or not he goes down for 1/6 and election crimes.
The question is whether Rudy understands he’s going to prison.
If Rudy understands that that he’s already a lock for federal prison, then yes, he can be trusted to do the selfish thing of saving himself by selling Trump out to the 1/6 committee and the DOJ. It’s not about him doing the right or wrong thing. He’ll do the selfish thing.
If Rudy delusionally still thinks he can beat the rap on the coming DOJ charges, then he might be playing games with the 1/6 committee. But as we saw with Meadows previously, Giuliani would need to have ALREADY given the committee crucial evidence just to get this far with them.
So the WORST case scenario for us is that Rudy flakes from here, the committee dunks him for contempt (and maybe perjury), the committee still gets to move forward with the evidence that Rudy has already provided, and the DOJ indicts Rudy for everything under the sun.
The only question here is whether this is a minor victory, or a massive victory, for the 1/6 committee.
There’s no scenario where the committee loses.
There’s no scenario where Rudy outsmarts the committee and then just magically “gets away with it all.”
Can’t wait to hear how the doomsday pundits will try to convince us that a completely witness and mostly senile Rudy Giuliani is somehow going to outsmart the good guys. This kind of doomsday fan fiction is always worth a chuckle. Those pundits are literally never proven correct.
Back in the real world, the real unknown is whether Giuliani is cooperating with the 1/6 committee because he plans to cut a deal with the DOJ, or because he’s already cut a deal with the DOJ.
Even Rudy has to know that by testifying to the 1/6 committee, he’ll incriminate himself so badly that he’ll have no choice but to cut a cooperating deal with the DOJ. And that’s the thing to keep an eye on as Rudy’s cooperation moves forward.
If Rudy has already cut a DOJ deal, his testimony will be helpful but guarded in specific ways. And the committee will be fine with him omitting certain names etc, because it’ll know he’s protecting sensitive DOJ investigations.
If Rudy goes whole hog and gives every last detail to the committee, it’ll suggest that he hasn’t yet cut a DOJ deal, so there’s no one asking him to keep certain sensitive things quiet.
In any case, today is a good day for the good guys. And it’s the second day in a row that an insider has decided to sell Trump out to investigators. Mazars yesterday, Rudy today. These things tend to snowball, as there are only so many “lenient” cooperation deals to go around.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Even if Rudy Giuliani is just using the threat of cooperation with the 1/6 committee to get Trump to pay his legal bills, it's still a minor victory for the committee, bad news for Trump, and probably self defeating for Rudy.
Just to get the committee to say that Rudy is cooperating, he must have had to give them key evidence against Trump already. So now they get to use that evidence, whether Rudy flakes from here or not.
This would help the committee, and damage Trump, for obvious reasons.
It would also ensure Rudy is fairly quickly indicted for contempt, which would only make his legal bills even worse.
It doesn’t matter what Rudy Giuliani says he’s going to do, or whether he can be “trusted.” If Rudy now understands he’s going to prison, he’ll give up Trump. If Rudy still delusionally thinks he’ll get away with it all, he won’t give up Trump. Simple as that, no other factors.
"But Rudy went on TV and said..."
Irrelevant.
"But Rudy will never [blank] no matter what..."
Not how anything works.
"But Rudy is just playing games!"
Sure, if he still delusionally thinks playing games will magically keep him out of prison.
If Rudy now understands he's going to prison, he knows full well that he has to flip, and that if he plays games it won't work out for him.
Donald Trump’s longtime accounting firm says his last decade of financial statements can’t be relied upon, drops Trump Org as a client. This gives banks a perfect excuse to call in Trump’s loans, take his assets before New York state does. It’s all coming crashing down now.
Notable: Mazars sent this letter to Trump a fees days ago, and the New York AG already has it. Suggests Mazars cc’d it to her, which in turn suggests Mazars is already fully cooperating with the NY probe into Trump.
Also notable: the New York AG almost immediately filed this letter with the courts, making it public right away instead of strategically waiting for anything. It ensures Trump’s lenders and creditors know about it.
Seeing a lot of the usual talk about whether Rudy Giuliani will “grow a conscience” by testifying to the 1/6 committee and whether this will make him “good” or “bad” and whether he can be “trusted.” But this is gibberish. It’s about Rudy selfishly saving himself, nothing more.
The ONLY factor here is whether Rudy has concluded he has to sell out Trump world in order to stay out of prison. If yes, then he can be trusted to selfishly give up crucial evidence and truthful testimony. Not because he’s now “good” but because he’s as selfish as ever.
On the other hand, if Rudy still thinks he can skate without having to give up Trump, then he’ll try to bullshit the committee.
If the 1/6 committee has to give immunity to a few mid-level Trump people in order to take Donald Trump down, then do it. Just coordinate with the DOJ so that it's done right.
The pundits yelling "bad idea!" are just trying to make themselves look smarter than the 1/6 committee.
These are the pundits who always bash the 1/6 committee for not being "aggressive" enough. Then when the committee considers an aggressive move, these same pundits always bash that idea. They automatically bash any move the committee does or doesn't make. It's just their brand.
If the committee gives immunity to Eastman, these pundits will say it should have been given to Clark instead.
If the committee gives immunity to Clark, these pundits will say it should have gone to Eastman instead.
It's an automatic rejection of the committee's every move.
House Republican Nancy Mace kissed Trump’s ass, and he’s still endorsing her far right primary challenger. When are these idiots going to learn that for Trump, loyalty is a one way street 😆
Also, while Mace’s district does lean Republican, her seat was previously occupied by a Democrat. If Trump’s far right candidate takes out Mace in the Republican primary, the Democrats *may* be able to pick up that seat.
It’s a reminder that by endorsing non-viable Republican candidates who are personally loyal to him, Trump is actually helping the Democrats in the midterms. He knows this, he just doesn’t care. He’s that desperate to remain relevant in the Republican Party.