Big_Orrin Profile picture
Feb 14 9 tweets 2 min read
1. Some thoughts on missing barrels while watching the Super Bowl.

The only accurate way to look at what is being consumed in the oil market is mass. Not volume.

To try and balance volume takes way too many assumptions to be accurate
2. Why? Because mass cannot be created or destroyed therefore it will always balance.

Volume on the other hand is affected by pressure, temperature, composition, refinery configuration etc. and is effectively impossible to balance especially after processed in a refinery.
3. To try and standardize a barrel of crude oil or products to minimize the effect of volume variance a standardized temperature and pressure is used.

But that leaves composition that prevents standardization.
4. Chain length and shape of the hydrocarbon chains plus impurities such as sulphur change the density, specific gravity or API.

Example

A barrel of 45 API oil weighs 127kg
A barrel of 20 API oil weighs 148kg
5. So in a well configurated refinery a barrel of low API crude contains more volume of standard spec. product than a higher API crude

It means any inaccuracy of the average API of crude in calculation could underestimate amount of products produced and overestimate crude demand
6. Further a refinery produces more volume of products than crude it processes due to breaking/separation of hydrocarbon chains. Volume increases can be more than 15%, I.e. 1 bbl crude produces 1.15 bbls products

underestimating processing gain means overestimating crude demand
7. Finally the breakdown of products produced also changes the volume of crude required. The more lighter products produced the more volume produced for the same level of crude produced.
8. There are many assumptions made with volume balances and a significant of average conversation factors that are used. Any inaccuracy in those will make a big difference.
9. In this case missing barrels is not just likely newly determined extra demand but also underestimating the amount of products produced per barrel or the refinery operation.

It is why doing volume instead of mass balances is just so inaccurate.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Big_Orrin

Big_Orrin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Big_Orrin

Jan 28
1. A rant about the energy transition

The way the energy transition is happening it will fail because it fails to understand what is important to most people and what is not. Therefore, is likely to lose significant support with out a recalibration.
2. There are many polls that show emissions are important to people. But they are always a one off question. They are never asked where emissions fall within a person’s list of priorities. It is now assumed that emissions are every persons priority. They are not.
3. Actions of people show emissions are not high on their list of priorities. When demand increases sufficiently and coal fired plants enter operation, they don’t reduce their demand to stop the coal emissions. They continue living their life expecting availability of energy.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 27, 2021
1. If I was physical trader with long term gas contract with Russia. I would not buy extra. Why?

A. Extra flow would reduce value of inventories and profit selling it.
B. Buying extra would provide little profitable margin on the extra volume and potentially losing money
2. As soon as more flow is seen from Russia if I have bought extra then price falls in this volatile market. Thus reducing the value of my cheap inventories and cheap contracted volumes that I am selling on at market value.
3. If I bought extra it would be at spot price and I would sell at spot price. This would mean little margin and it could mean I lose if the price falls below what I pay. Why take the risk?
Read 9 tweets
Nov 25, 2021
1. Seen a lot of paper traders telling Physical traders what they should do with regard to the SPR release and how much money they could make. $5/bbl seems to be the consensus level. On 1mb that is a cool $5m profit.

But sadly reality is not like paper trading.
2. Paper traders suggest you sell the prompt month you where you receive the crude oil and then buy back the month you need to return the crude oil to the SPR. Simple!!!!!!!

Not quite.
3. Lets take the costs on the physical transaction part.

First the easy bit. the cost charged by the SPR

For one year it is 3.9% to be repaid in extra barrels.

So 1mb received requires payment of 1,039,000bbls

Cost: $300k
Read 18 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
1. Thread

Now seen what Biden is doing, I have been hearing it is not enough, it is worse than expected, etc. But putting potentially 50 million prompt barrels in market is not nothing. It is 1/9th of total US commercial crude inventories and 3 days of US refinery throughput
2. It is 50 WAF cargoes, or 83 North Sea cargoes. In WAF terms that is equivalent to 1.5 Angolan programs and 1 Nigerian. These two programs are already finding it difficult to sell.

So to stuff that amount into a market in as little as 15 days is huge.
3. Now the argument that I have seen most this last week is about OPEC+ retaliation as if it was some level of equivalence. That by suspending their increases OPEC+ would put it to Biden. So let’s do the numbers.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 23, 2021
1. In Europe data showed that 19% of new cars are of Electric in nature. What is interesting is how that number is occurring.

In Spain, EV prices are not falling even with subsidies. What is happening is gasoline and diesel car prices are going up.
2. A Volkswagen Golf could be found for around €18k brand new before COVID, now lowers price is €23k. Dacia Sandero was €7k now is €8k.

It is happening across the board that new gasoline/diesel prices have risen while EV prices have remained static.
3. So what we are seeing is lower income people being forced out the new car market while those on higher incomes benefit from subsidies. So emissions are not going down, because the market is limited on who can pay the price for an EV.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
1. This is a good listen but the most important factor for the energy transition was barely mentioned which was the backup Energy system. This is the factor that will make or break the energy transition. A reliable back up system.
2. In a push towards renewables, it’s intermittency means a back up system is needed much more and also needs to be much bigger in size. The U.K. saw prices over $3000/ MWh and a significant factor was the loss of its wind generation system.
3. The U.K. has. a 20GW metered system but during the last 3 weeks it was producing less than 3GW. That means the back up system needed to be 17 to 20GW. This is far bigger than if the U.K. lost a nuclear power plant (biggest is 3.2GW) or a Gas Plant (biggest is 1.9GW).
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(