DCPetterson Profile picture
Feb 14 13 tweets 3 min read
I'm a writer. I know very well, words have power.

Some words are so damn powerful, one must be careful in using them.

Words can harm or heal. Words can sway armies and move mountains.

It is possible to rob words of their power, but it often is useful not to.

1/12
The comedian Lenny Bruce and the social commentator George Orwell both understood the arcane power of words.

Orwell taught us how limiting vocabulary and altering meanings controls how we think.

Bruce taught us the force of using or avoiding words.

2/12
One of Bruce's most hilarious and obscene stand-up routines involved not saying a single dirty word. He merely implied. He said "blank" whenever he meant anything suggestive. We all knew what he meant.

He also went to the other extreme.

3/12
Saturating a speech with offensive words makes those sounds almost meaningless. They become no more than percussion, just rimshots, a punctuation mark devoid of effect.

Watch "Blazing Saddles" or "Django Unchained" and you'll see what I mean.

4/12
There are certain words in today's culture which remain intensely taboo. Their use is offensive. Anyone using them means to offend.

We can those words into mere unnoticeable noise if we wanted to. Lenny Bruce and Mel Brooks and Quentin Tarantino taught us how.

5/12
But it is useful to keep them as powerful spells, magical curses. There's a line about that in the play "Inherit the Wind."

Henry Drummond is asked why he uses so many offensive words. His answer is informative:

6/12
"I don’t swear for the hell of it. Language is a poor enough means of communication. We’ve got to use all the words we’ve got. Besides, there are damn few words anybody understands."

The power to curse with a word is also the power remind others of the force of a curse.

7/12
Some words evoke hate. Hate exists whether there are words to express it or not. The power of a hate-word is not only to express hate, but also to remind us, to warn us, that hate exists, and that we must resist it.

That's why we avoid saying, for instance, the "N-word."

8/12
Hate will not be banished if we extinguish one expression of it. Hate will simply find a new outlet.

The horror isn't the words, but what the words conjure. If we lose the expression, the horror will become unseen, hiding behind our eyelids. But it will remain.

9/12
So I have mixed feelings about powerful words. I use them in my writing, and in my tweets--and I use them with intent, when I want to invoke strong emotion.

All the words you're offended by--their power can be eradicated if the words are overused.

10/12
All the words you're offended by--they can become meaningless, just inoffensive sounds, by the simple technique of overuse.

Do any of us really want that?

Or do we want them to remind us of the offense that lurks behind them?

And what horrors would replace them?

11/12
I'm a writer. I love words.

I know something about the dark magic of words.

I write some horror fiction. I love horror too.

But we're living in a horror novel these days.

I have mixed feelings about all this.

12/12
PS If a tweet enrages you, or saddens you, or moves you, or changes you--try the exercise of examining which particular words did that. Then decide if you wanted that to happen, or if the writer did that against your will, and against your common sense.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DCPetterson

DCPetterson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dcpetterson

Feb 11
The dichotomy between Republican faux-freakout over Hillary's emails (on the one hand) and their non-reaction to Trump's destruction of White House documents (on the other) highlights that Republicans are not hypocrites. They're fascist authoritarians.

Hear me out.

1/14
First, let's make sure we've highlighted the important similarities.

Republican propagandists feigned being aghast that Hillary Clinton had official State Department business in her private email server. They insisted there were classified communications there.

2/14
Republicans even claimed Secretary Clinton had improperly (even illegally) deleted some of those emails.

Turns out, she didn't have anything classified there, and she deleted nothing but private emails unrelated to official business, and she did nothing illegal.

3/14
Read 15 tweets
Feb 11
I love when I point out Presidents don't tell Attorneys General what to do,

and then pretend-leftists say, "What about Trump and Barr?"

Because they're trying to tell us fascist authoritarianism is the way it should be.

And then I can laugh and block them.

1/4
This isn't the only example.

Also when I say, "DOJ doesn't talk about ongoing investigations," and they say, "What about Comey?" like they're arguing what Comey did should be the example we should follow.

Laugh. Block.

2/4
Or, I say, "Investigation comes BEFORE indictment. In America we don't lock people up until prosecutors can make a case in court," and faux-leftists say, "Well, poor people are locked up all the time!" as if corruption SHOULD BE the norm.

Yeah, but no.

Final conclusion:

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
I've noted a tendency for Twitts to say "I think..." followed by meaningless bullshit intended to create distrust, division, cynicism, and hoplessness.

Example: "I think <DemLeader> is compromised, and is really supporting Trump and on the take from Big Hamburger."

Why?

1/6
"Because <DemLeader> isn't doing <X>!!"

Try to dispute that nonsense, and you're told, "It's just my opinion, so shuddup!" which is the faux-left version of "I was just joking!" when you call out a racist on their racism.

2/6
We're supposed to treat a load of horsecrap as if it's worth something, as long as it starts with "I think..."

No. An uninformed, unsupportable, nonsensical "opinion" is propagandistic bullshit, especially if the obvious intent is to tear down the defenders of democracy.

3/6
Read 7 tweets
Feb 8
We keep hearing how Trump does what he wants, always succeeds and gets away with it, and there are no consequences.

All that is false. Every word of it. Trump is a complete failure, nothing he does works, and he has faced massive blowback.

I'll give some examples.

1/10
Trump University was forced to close. That grift had been a big moneymaker for the Don the Con. He was forced to pay a $25 million settlement to the people he defrauded.

2/10
nbcnews.com/politics/white…
Trump Foundation was dismantled. He had been cheating charities, and had to repay $2 million. This was while he was president. You may not have heard about it.

3/10
news.yahoo.com/trump-pays-2-m…
Read 14 tweets
Jan 26
The man who won World War II was not hailed as a hero until midway through the 2010's. Most people still don't know his name. I bet many of my Tweeple do, because you peeps are smart.

1/8
The depth of his classified record wasn't revealed until the 1990s. I knew about his achievements in the 1970s, because I'm a computer science geek and a history freak. And I'm old.

He committed suicide in the 1950s, at the age of 41.

2/8
He killed himself because he'd been persecuted by the British government for something right-wing American fascists and televangelists again want to make a crime.

Some think we might have beaten Hitler without this man's help.

3/8
Read 8 tweets
Jan 23
Oz wants to debate Fauci, trying to put himself (a huckster and a fraud) on the same level as one of the world's most respected medical professionals.

Oz, of course, won't be limited by boring things like "facts" or "data." He would be free to spew mountains of bullshit.

1/4
In any sort of "debate," hucksters use their time to fast-talk dozens of lies per second into a bilge of toxic effluvium, unconstrained by ethics, truth, reality, or even sanity. No rational opponent can respond to even a fraction of the tsunami of mendacity.

2/4
Of course, Oz doesn't want to debate any of the Democrats who are running for the Senate seat he's auditioning for. This isn't about discussing real issues. It's about creating a boogeyman target, spreading conspiracy theories, and selling more swag.

3/4
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(