Halley Profile picture
Feb 17 6 tweets 2 min read
The diversity of practices within Hinduism is grossly misinterpreted these days to assume we are a "anything goes" religion.

Dharma as understood by our ancestors is based on Sruti, Smriti, Sadachara primarily.

+
The Sadachara part is is a very Hindu innovation that constantly negotiated with diverse local customs and legitimised some, tolerated some and rejected some.

Multiplicity of Smritis also is a proof for the negotiation, tenacity, longevity etc.

+
Today what is happening is that the diversity of Sadachara is being used to portray this impression that - Look there is no one rule. You can do whatever you want.

Sadachara is not Swecchachara i.e, unconstrained freedom to say muh Hinduism muh wish.

+
That we don't know or can't follow our achara is because we are all suffering from a disconnect with our sampradayas and acharas.

But that can't be used as an excuse to recede into Swecchachara.

+
What we are doing now is attempting to sacralise or legitimise Swecchachara.

We say "I am a devout Hindu. My religion is liberal. I can do whatever I want"

Next line

"These stupid backward looking Dharmacharyas aren't sacralising Swecchachara"

+
They are not representative of Hinduism anyway.

Muh religion muh rules.

If all you need is muh rules. They why do you need religion itself bro. Keep chanting Aham Brahmasmi. You are God. You don't need familial customs, community customs, transcendental customs. Enjoy.

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Halley

Halley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @halleyji

Feb 18
I referred to this quote attributed to Wittgenstein recently. Worth elaborating in the context of the Rigveda.pdf worldview.

"Tradition is not something a man can learn; nor a thread he can pick up when he feels like it; any more than a man can choose his own ancestors"

+
Most non-missionary / non-proselytising religions operate this way. Even the proselytizing ones work this way for your progeny once you jump ship.

+
However in case of Hindus and other indigenous faiths world over there is no explicit urge to convert others. Hence no urge to codify or uniformize customs into a book based religion and say look here's the book. This is the entirety and essence of my faith.

+
Read 16 tweets
Feb 18
"The fact is India that is Bharat has always been a pluralistic society" -

Yes but we never had or felt the need for a uniform code to sustain this pluralism as long as the King was Dharmic. No popular demand for uniformity existed ever.

+
Harmony doesn't need uniformity.

Totalitarian big brother states need control and uniformity.

Not decentralised Dharmic constructs where the head of state can be a sovereign of sorts on top without being a control freak or indulging in micro management

+
The secular state tries to wrest control from religion(s) on the lives of people in the garb of defending individual rights and the autonomy of man. This is a problematic construct. It will only shrink the role of religion more as there is only so much room anyway!

+
Read 9 tweets
Feb 18
I think we carry a very carefully constructed image of Adi Shankaracharya in popular Hindu psyche today which is very different from traditional commentary. Part of the blame is with the Indological discovery of Shankaracharya in early 18th/19th century or so.

+
Most traditional commentators are clear that Shankara Advaita style realisation isn't going to be possible for millions in same lifetime. They acknowledge it is not for everyone. The path exists. But not everyone can withstand the ordeal in same lifetime.

+
So they don't portray Shankaracharya discourse as some form of a "Individual is sovereign.This is Hindu liberalism" style construct.

+
Read 17 tweets
Feb 18
Remember reading on this long ago. Not acquainted with what happened after that. Came across this on my feed today. Reading. Interesting.

“Technology as Mimesis: Biomimicry as Regenerative Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Technology”

+
Part of Techné: Research in Philosophy of Technology (accepted for publication) - researchgate.net/publication/35…

+
Appreciate all these good folks keeping this kind of research for public access. Remember the times when I used to ask friends and family in universities for PDFs 😁

+
Read 5 tweets
Feb 17
On customs as law

"From the inception of colonial rule, customary law was applicable on two conditions: (1) that it was not repugnant to justice, equity, or good morality and (2) that it was neither in its terms nor by necessary implication in conflict with any written law"

+
"The application of the repugnancy clause has always been a source of controversy. It was observed that subjecting African customary law to a repugnancy clause and the clause being applied to African customary law by English colonial judges meant two things: "

+
"(1) that customary law was inferior to the common law and (2) that the standard by which the validity of African customary law was to be determined was inevitably to be that set up by English ideas of legal norms, justice, and morality"

+
Read 9 tweets
Feb 16
This is a good article. On mining.

I didn't know this about US mining regulations. I read such about Canada. Very interesting.

foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/07/ren…

+
"We shouldn’t assume environmental and labor regulations are more stringent, or that mining is thus more responsible, in the global north. Affluent countries have their own regulatory weaknesses"

+
"Take the United States, where the law regulating mining on public land dates to 1872, contains no environmental provisions, and facilitates prospecting for valuable mineral deposits without consulting or even informing Indigenous tribes,"

+
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(