Halley Profile picture
Feb 18 9 tweets 2 min read
"The fact is India that is Bharat has always been a pluralistic society" -

Yes but we never had or felt the need for a uniform code to sustain this pluralism as long as the King was Dharmic. No popular demand for uniformity existed ever.

+
Harmony doesn't need uniformity.

Totalitarian big brother states need control and uniformity.

Not decentralised Dharmic constructs where the head of state can be a sovereign of sorts on top without being a control freak or indulging in micro management

+
The secular state tries to wrest control from religion(s) on the lives of people in the garb of defending individual rights and the autonomy of man. This is a problematic construct. It will only shrink the role of religion more as there is only so much room anyway!

+
"If we were to examine certain practices through a 21st-century lens, some seem regressive, outdated and archaic. A few Hindu practices too, are no exceptions. But more importantly, we have embraced reforms, from Adi Shankaracharya to Swami Vivekananda.."

+
From that 21st century lens some may consider religion itself regressive and outdated. What if that then?

Reform can be done without enforcing Uniformity as well. That is how we had it in the past with that much flexibility without losing diversity.

+
Kumbha Mela itself was a famed gathering of experts for course correction on deciding on such to make amends to lokaachara (law of the land) from time to time

There are so many other constructs like Parishads, Local assemblies that had this power to reform from time to time.

+
Too much friction? Ok go ahead and create your own sampradaya. That route existed as well.

To codify Hindu laws and customs may be a decent endeavour as long as there is awareness that they may change here and there from time to time.

+
But to push for uniformity in the name of codifying is another thing altogether.

+
No one knows what forms UCC would take but going by this country's post independent history and the general cluelessness of Hindus on Dharmic matters we may only end up reforming Hinduism to take it closer to Abrahmic faiths.

That is my thinking.

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Halley

Halley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @halleyji

Feb 19
Few thoughts on this piece by Shepherd gaaru. Won't link. Those really keen can Google.

He tries to draw a wedge between Brahmins as a representative of civilization of the book and Shudras as a civilization of the spade.

+ Image
This is a very popular Marxist trope and there is so much irony there. Needs some elaboration.

"A book is not an instrument of civilisation building. On the other hand, the spade is an instrument with which civilisation is built" shepherd gaaru says.

+
So he says Outsider invader Aryan Brahminical Vedic civilization is a book civilization.

Pre-Vedic Harappan civilization is a spade civilization. Workers of the world, unite kind he imagines perhaps. Classless egalitarian utopia until evil wily Aryans came.

+
Read 22 tweets
Feb 19
Not sure on what grounds Hindu parents can argue against this of and when it comes to India.
At best I can think one minority religion may complain and Hindus will say why are you conservative? Look at us we are a liberal religion our religion accepts it all?

+
Don't think Hindus in India have any locus standi on such based on their faith. You have reformed your religion so much don't argue like you have non-negotiablles in your faith. You might as well reform for this also incase you have any religious issues on such.

+
And this discourse is perfectly fine per the other dominant religion of our time - Liberty and Equality. Most Hindus subscribe to that religion anyway. So nothing to object there as well.

+
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18
I referred to this quote attributed to Wittgenstein recently. Worth elaborating in the context of the Rigveda.pdf worldview.

"Tradition is not something a man can learn; nor a thread he can pick up when he feels like it; any more than a man can choose his own ancestors"

+
Most non-missionary / non-proselytising religions operate this way. Even the proselytizing ones work this way for your progeny once you jump ship.

+
However in case of Hindus and other indigenous faiths world over there is no explicit urge to convert others. Hence no urge to codify or uniformize customs into a book based religion and say look here's the book. This is the entirety and essence of my faith.

+
Read 16 tweets
Feb 18
I think we carry a very carefully constructed image of Adi Shankaracharya in popular Hindu psyche today which is very different from traditional commentary. Part of the blame is with the Indological discovery of Shankaracharya in early 18th/19th century or so.

+
Most traditional commentators are clear that Shankara Advaita style realisation isn't going to be possible for millions in same lifetime. They acknowledge it is not for everyone. The path exists. But not everyone can withstand the ordeal in same lifetime.

+
So they don't portray Shankaracharya discourse as some form of a "Individual is sovereign.This is Hindu liberalism" style construct.

+
Read 17 tweets
Feb 18
Remember reading on this long ago. Not acquainted with what happened after that. Came across this on my feed today. Reading. Interesting.

“Technology as Mimesis: Biomimicry as Regenerative Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Technology”

+
Part of Techné: Research in Philosophy of Technology (accepted for publication) - researchgate.net/publication/35…

+
Appreciate all these good folks keeping this kind of research for public access. Remember the times when I used to ask friends and family in universities for PDFs 😁

+
Read 5 tweets
Feb 17
The diversity of practices within Hinduism is grossly misinterpreted these days to assume we are a "anything goes" religion.

Dharma as understood by our ancestors is based on Sruti, Smriti, Sadachara primarily.

+
The Sadachara part is is a very Hindu innovation that constantly negotiated with diverse local customs and legitimised some, tolerated some and rejected some.

Multiplicity of Smritis also is a proof for the negotiation, tenacity, longevity etc.

+
Today what is happening is that the diversity of Sadachara is being used to portray this impression that - Look there is no one rule. You can do whatever you want.

Sadachara is not Swecchachara i.e, unconstrained freedom to say muh Hinduism muh wish.

+
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(