If learning anything 'makes you feel uncomfortable' (gives you Cognitive-Emotional Dissonance) — it's absolutely a signal you NEED to learn more about it. Moreover & more specifically, you need to ask yourself, "Why does this 'make me feel uncomfortable'?"
Truth: A person who never confronts their Cognitive-Emotional Dissonance, never grows.
Addendum B:
Religious leaders grow off-the-charts emotionally uncomfortable, when you raise questions that contradict accepted doctrines. In various ways, they tell you to, "Just accept it".
(And they label you as a trouble maker)
Addendum C:
In a very real sense, this is their Cognitive-Emotional Dissonance confronting and trying to subjugate your Cognitive-Emotional Dissonance.
Addendum D:
Of course, this phenomenon just doesn't occur in the context of religion — it's everywhere:
• Relationships
• School
• Work
• Professional Organizations
• Politics
Addendum E:
Being able to spot these potential dissonances as early as possible, whether they be part of corporate world-view, politics, personal relationships, etc. — is a life skill which we all should cultivate.
Addendum F:
Confronting your own (or another person's) Cognitive-Emotional Dissonances requires:
• Moral Courage
• Objectivity
• Thorough Self-Reflection
• Often (but not always) some level of Education (take care to avoid the seductive trap of cherry-picking)
So when governments pass laws against teaching subjects that make people 'uncomfortable', it's NOT your comfort they're trying to protect. They're trying to prevent you from learning truths — truths they fear you will learn. They're trying to control you. Don't let them.
Ω
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ This image of Matt Gaetz shows him rotating both his head/neck as well as his eyes to his left. His torso is not oriented toward the the person at whom he's looking.
3/ Human beings don't look directly at people they don't like, don't respect, or don't believe.
1/ THREAD/Proposal: NASA, the ESA, and the CSA should change name of the James Webb Space Telescope — and rename this incredible instrument of discovery after Henrietta Swan Leavitt.
2/ Henrietta Swan Leavitt (1868 – 1921) was a brilliant, creative, prolific, and largely unacknowledged astronomer. She discovered the relationship between the periods of Cepheid variables and their Luminosity.
3/ Her discovery became the first "Standard Candle" enabling other astronomers to measure the distance to other galaxies and other objects. This astronomical relationship was thereafter known as "Leavitt's Law" and facilitated other major discoveries.
Hey @JeromeAdamsMD, tell us all about the permanent hole Donald Trump has in his hard palate. We both know it's caused by ischemic necrosis from decades of cocaine abuse. Tell us about the prosthetic device which occasionally loosens and gives rise to Trump's spontaneous lisp.
Addendum: And tell us more about Trump's ongoing severe drug abuse. Tell us about how Trump's snorted Adderall and Cocaine build up residue on the nasal side of the prosthesis, but occasionally leak around to the oral side — then shoot out his mouth in a projectile manner.
Addendum No. 2: Here's one example from 19 Oct. 2020 at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport showing at least 38 projectiles:
Hey, @tedcruz, serious question, did you get facial-hair approval from your wife before you grew a beard?
FACT: Men who grow facial hair without 1st getting approval from their partner, w/ extremely high probability, are either having an affair or trying to do so. #BodyLanguage
Addendum: Also, if men grow facial hair just after a break-up/just after filing for divorce (or just after being served with divorce), then the same #BodyLanguage/Behavioral axiom applies — they were, with extremely high likelihood, being unfaithful.
Addendum No. 2: It's passed off as a response to teasing or a passive act (i.e., "The guys at the office are teasing me that I can't grow a beard", or "It's a vacation beard — I think I'll keep it."), but it not passive or lazy. It's quite deliberate.
2/ Note Baldwin's facial expression. What do you see?
• He's 'Smiling' out of one side of the mouth
3/ This is NOT a Sincere Smile (not a Duchenne Smile).
How can we tell this his 'smile' is insincere smile? What characteristics are displayed and betrayed here?
1/ THREAD: Going along with the crowd does not take ANY courage. It may very well BE the ethical stance or it may NOT be the unethical stance — but no matter how loud you get shout and how dogmatic you get, this is NOT courage.
2/ Going along w/ the crowd will be an Adrenaline Rush — but it's often just weird sort of *Adrenaline Substitute* for courage because you get to shout, scream, flex your muscles, be part of a tribe, (& sometimes' you'll be manipulated toward violence) — but this is NOT courage.
3/ Going along with the crowd (often but not always) will satisfy a part of the human psyche — the part where we feel the strength of belonging to SOME group, SOME movement, SOME tribe. It's seductive. Don't be seduced.