"Life began at 70 for Jagjivan Ram Yadav when he stepped out of Faizabad jail after spending 38 years as an undertrial prisoner without any trial ever."
According to Prison Statistics of India Report 2019 ashocking 70% of Indian prisoners are undertrial. Their crime never been proven. In USA this number is a mere 23.03%. Prison occupancy capacity in India is 4,03,739, actual occupancy is 118% i.e. 4,78,600 inmates.
Number of undertrial prisoners increased at a faster rate between 2001 and 2019 than rate of convicted prisoners. The gap started widening during early 80s. Uttar Pradesh tops the list with highest number of undertrial prisoners, 73,418, constituting 22.2% of total.
As many as 5,011 inmates have been in jail for over five years with highest number of them, 42.74%, just in Uttar Pradesh. A majority of under-trials (70.6 per cent) are illiterate or semi-literate which indicates that they are socially and economically backward.
These shocking numbers are a testimony to the gross violation of the basic principles of criminal jurisprudence that of “presumption of innocence till proven guilty”, “right to fair and speedy trial”, and the constitutional “right to life and personal liberty.”
The Law Commission of India in its 268th report observed that bail rule, jail exception is the logical and consistent adaptation of the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, and several other conventions.
Supreme Court laid down the ‘Bail rule, jail exception’ principle in a landmark judgement in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Balchand alias Baliya (AIR 1977 2447).SC has also from time to time reminded High Courts and lower courts to follow it.
Lakhs of Muslim women in India stepped out of their doors first time during Anti-CAA protests. It took these many years to come out of the walls. Village after village I traveled community meetings were not attended by Muslim women. What's the reason? If not purdah?
Most Muslims in India are poor and there's no question of education or jobs or public participation. The rich households allow eduction but not jobs or any public activities. Family, religion strictly control Muslim women's lives even if educated. These are the truth.
How long must reforms wait? And why? Reforms started in Hindu personal laws way back in 19th century. Then in 1950s. Gender equality given in property inheritance despite society not changing. But Muslim personal laws and practices remained untouched, unchanged.
Burqa has no place in modern civilized world. Hijab is ok but not burqa. It's not rational or logical for human beings to walk around covering their face fully. I don't care if it's culture of religion or identity marker. Choice argument do not work because choice is conditioned.
My issue is that Hindutva gang is attacking Muslim identity. Making religion as the basis. Don't bring religion in school. Why the hell not? Every other school has saraswati vandana in prayer, every annual function start with Ganesh Vandana. Logic/rationality be the basis.
So I will support if burqa is completely banned everywhere. Like France did. But not if they ban hijab. The difference between hijab and burqa for me is the fine balance of logic and rationality at one hand and religious beliefs and personal choice on the other.
पंजाब शिक्षा मंत्री परगट सिंह का दिल्ली डिप्टी सीएम को करारा जवाब, कहा- पैरामीटर पर जहां चाहें बहस कर लें...
Interview with Pargat Singh in Hindi. December 4, 2021. navjivanindia.com/news/punjab-ed…
Indian judiciary and executive together doing a disgusting mockery of democratic process when you compare #YatiNarsinghanand getting bail in just a month and Dr kafeel Khan spending a year. Umar Khalid and others still in jail. We should all be ashamed of this.
RW pretend they don't know the issue. Muslim leaders getting far more punishments for doing no crime while Hindu religious leaders getting almost no punishment or very little for graver crime. Yati called for genocide, Khan called for unity. State used UAPA selectively.
Why UAPA on #Kafeelkhan but not on #YatiNarsinghanand? State police have absolutely no explanation. UAPA is a vague law. No proper definition of what is unlawful actives so a biased State is using it selectively against those they don't like eg Muslim leaders, liberals.
In all these years I have never understood why Kashmiris want Azadi? India mein kya problem hai? We got freedom in 1947, how can you possibly have a separate freedom? Where will you go with it? I have also not understood how can guns and jails hold on to those who want to leave.
I have heard many arguments by separatists, and I can give a counter to each one of them. But because there is already so much bloodshed in Kashmir that I avoid talking about it. I will just say this, militancy to gain azadi, is doomed for eternity.
The rest of India with 80% Hindu population still has only 40% voting for Hindutva. Rest 60% fighting against Hindutva to protect India's secular fabric. In such time, Pak sponsored Kasmiri militants killing Hindu civilians and Kashmiris cheer for Pak. What is this? How inhuman?
At the exact time when SC gave decision on #PegasusSnoopgate both India Today and NDTV showing Capt Amrinder Singh's press conference. Technically he is a nobody except an old disgruntled man. But for media he is more imp than SC's decision against Modi govt's snooping.
I am watching TV for past 15 mins and they have not yet cut the Capt Amrinder press conference and gone live to Supreme Court. Million times in a Rahul Gandhi presser they had cut abruptly saying, "we have fresh reports coming in, we have to cut in."
Now @IndiaToday is running HUGE Bold letters headlines "Breaking Capt Amrinder announces new party". How they are trying to avoid the most damning headlines for Modi in 7 years. #PegasusSnoopgate will be investigated by SC appointed Committee. Centre's stand dismissed by SC.