The plutocrat-owned narrative managers of the political/media class work constantly to shrink the Overton window, the spectrum of debate that is considered socially acceptable.
They do this by framing more and more debates in terms of how the oligarchic empire should be sustained and supported, steering them away from debates about whether that empire should be permitted to exist at all.
They get people debating whether there should be some moderate changes made or no meaningful changes at all, rather than the massive, sweeping changes we all know need to be made to the entire system.
They get people debating whether they should elect a crook in a red hat or a crook in a blue hat, rather than whether or not they should be forced to elect crooks.
They get people debating violations of government secrecy laws, not whether the government has any business keeping those secrets from its citizenry in the first place.
They get people debating how internet censorship should take place and whom should be censored, rather than whether any internet censorship should occur.
They get people debating how and to what extent government surveillance should occur, not whether the government has any business spying on its citizens.
They get people debating whether or not a group of protesters are sufficiently polite, rather than debating the thing those protesters are demonstrating against.
They get people debating about whether this thing or that thing is a “conspiracy theory”, rather than discussing the known fact that powerful people conspire.
They get people debating whether politicians should have corporate sponsors, rather than whether corporations should be allowed to interfere in the electoral process at all.
They get people debating if the US should be pursuing regime change in Iran or Syria, rather than whether the US has any business overthrowing the governments of sovereign nations to begin with.
They get people debating whether to kill people slowly by sanctions or kill them quickly with bombs, rather than whether they should be killed at all.
They get people debating whether or not some other country’s leader is an evil dictator, rather than whether it’s any of your business.
They get people debating the extent to which Russia and Trump were involved in the Democratic Party’s 2016 email leaks, rather than the contents of those leaks.
They get people impotently debating the bad things other countries do, rather than the bad things their own country does which they can actually do something about.
They get people debating whether western cold war escalations against the Russian Federation are sufficient, rather than whether they want the horrors of the cold war to be resurrected in the first place.
They get people debating what extent cannabis should be decriminalized, rather than whether the government should be allowed to lock anyone up for deciding to put any substance whatsoever in their own body.
They get people debating whether or not Julian Assange is “a real journalist”, rather than whether or not they should set legal precedents that necessarily criminalize acts of journalism.
They get people debating what the punishment should be for whistleblowers, not what the punishment should be for those they blow the whistle on.
They get people debating whether Fox or MSNBC is the real “fake news”, rather than whether the entirety of mainstream media is oligarchic propaganda.
They get people debating what should be done with money, not whether the concept of money itself is in need of a complete overhaul.
They get people debating what should be done with government, not whether the concept of government itself is in need of a complete overhaul.
They get people debating whether the status quo should be reinforced or revised, rather than whether it should be flushed down the toilet where it belongs.
They get people angrily debating things they can’t change, rather than constructively working on the things that they can.
They get people shoving against each other in opposite directions, while they swiftly build a cage around us all.
· Reports of shots or a firefight bringing police response and set EOD en route.
· 3 separate periods of gunfire reported.
· Warning messages for twenty minutes prior limited individual lives at risk.
· Epicenter of blast was next door to a well developed hub whic is Cold War age.
· Fiber infrastructure attack would be better staged at other than downtown locations.
· Redundancies in data storage make this good only if it was a single location.
· If fire suppression was water, this would be more effective because the water would ruin the servers
· Servers were immediately impacting 911 in Tennessee but a few hours later it was more widespread to Kentucky and elsewhere
Acting out "moral superiority" by defending one's own immorality in such a way that you blame the innocent for it... is an imoral act in itself. It's called psychological abuse... It's textbook NARCISSISTIC behavior.
#JoeBiden disgrace to humanity & anybody who supports him & Buffalo Girl.
I said years ago #SouthAfrica is the test bed for the USA. The world watches as people are exterminated. "Deplorables" next?
Look at SA, step up &
fix the real "wrongs of the past" @realDonaldTrump
Same people, same agenda... Whites are "evil deplorables" right?
26 years later and these are the headlines...
👇🏻👇🏻 Take a minute and read these headlines👇🏻👇🏻 thesouthafrican.com/tag/farm-murde…
If I suddenly drop off this scope, come to caravantomidnight.com
and you'll find me, if you want to. Will stay on YouTube as long as possible but time is getting short. As I see it, we are under Communist control already.
Major tremors will be felt before we break free of it.
Pro-life sidewalk chalk writer is arrested yet BLM scum go free for painting their huge banners on the streets and buildings, destroying property and threatening lives.
The damage being done to our already damaged children is immeasurable.
But the people want to feel safe.
And the safer they feel, the more danger they're in. They want to fit in. But the more they fit in, the more of their individual identity they lose until fear becomes the national identity.