🗣️ British scientists and politicians were primed to respond disastrously to Covid-19 long before the virus was even heard of, epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse argues in his book The Year the World Went Mad
❗️ The first disaster was basing our pandemic preparation on influenza, says Woolhouse.
🎒 That was why Covid models included schools, which are key drivers of flu transmission, but not care homes – with catastrophic consequences telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/2…
❗️ Another pitfall in our preparation stemmed from our experiences with swine flu.
😷 Exactly a decade before Covid really did erupt to change the world, public health officials were warning that swine flu would do the same.
“Basically, there was a false alarm,” says Woolhouse
❗️ Come 2019-20, scientists were loath “to make complete fools of ourselves” by crying wolf again.
Drastic early interventions which could have made a difference, like closing borders, became unthinkable
🗣️“We knew from February [2020], never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it,” Woolhouse says, a note of disbelief in his voice.
And yet in government, “there was no attention paid to that rather obvious drawback of the strategy”.
Policy suddenly began to move towards a middle ground mid-last year.
🗣️ “From the point that Matt Hancock left, the Government’s approach shifted from dealing with this [as a] short-term emergency problem to accepting we were living with a virus"
🗣️ "And I cannot stress how big I think that change was.
"We suddenly started doing much more sensible things… making all these decisions that we should have been making, well, right from the very beginning”
Ultimately, Woolhouse says, Britain’s Covid failure was “a system failure… of not welcoming other ideas, not being sufficiently self-critical".
"The way that science, scientific advisers, officials and government interact in a situation like this is at fault. We panicked”
In the UK, almost 2,000 miles away from the action, it’s easy to feel complacent about how war could affect our lives.
But experts say that war between Russia and Ukraine will change everyday life in the UK in ways most people have not yet fully understood
⚫️Cyber warfare attacks
💻If Russia invades Ukraine, Western powers are unlikely to deploy hard military power. Instead, Britain and the US would turn to their world-leading cyber-capabilities
🗣️“I accept my life has limitations but it feels as if nobody has to consider other people in this move to lift all restrictions,” says Diana Henry, The Telegraph’s cookery writer
🔴Two things were clear by the end of Monday's session of the Russian security council:
Vladimir Putin would recognise the breakaway Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics as independent states, and he would send regular Russian troops to defend them
❓But what will Russia do next?
The best case is that Vladimir Putin is continuing his game of incremental screw tightening and the Russian army will halt at the current line of contact, writes our Senior Foreign Correspondent @RolandOliphant
🗣️The invasion of Ukraine "has begun", Sajid Javid has said this morning.
Russian tanks entered the eastern breakaway regions of Donetsk and Luhansk last night under Vladimir Putin's orders telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…
🇺🇸White House officials have struggled to say whether Biden believes Russia sending "peacekeeping" forces into the separatist areas of Donetsk and Luhansk constitutes an "invasion."
The Russian president ordered the army across the border to "maintain peace", after he recognised the independence of the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk in a televised address to the nation #RussiaUkraineCrisis
In an ominous speech that lasted almost an hour, Mr Putin accused the Ukrainian government of "genocide" and said it was sure to seek nuclear weapons with the assistance of the West