I’m going to guess most people and articles that commented about Putin’s speech didn’t actually listen to it or read it. Most of them didn’t even touch on the key parts. I think they read a paraphrased version or the end point and just ran with that.
It doesn’t make Putin’s speech right or wrong…but one might as well read it if they want to say things about it. I read one whole article about how it gives a false version of history that didn’t even mention one quote from it or discuss the false aspect
I think wading through 8,000 words of the speech is probably difficult and obviously listening to it takes time (I listened to it during a drive and then read it later)…but then just deal with the key issue…don’t pretend to really challenge all its points if you don’t read it
If one wants to oppose Russia’s policies, it’s good to at least know what they are or what they claim to be
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My Ukraine coverage today, five articles looking at various angles; 1- "There is no international mechanism or world leadership that can stop wars like this and it will be essential in the next days to see how the US, UK and others respond to this attack" jpost.com/international/…
Question:
Months ago we were told that Russia was "rattled"...that Ukraine was "boosted" by Turkish drones it acquired. A "big role" in Ukraine's offense...so today where are the drones? Or is this a lesson that these kinds of UAVs alone are actually not gamechangers?
One of the narratives, falsely understood I think, from the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict was that the Ankara-made drones were a gamechanger, when in fact it was other loitering munition technology, primarily Israel's, that was important alongside it
Ankara has a very close relationship with some media and it feeds stories to the media to pump up the sales...there are uncritical reports...like questions of "how do the drones work in contested airspace"?
Pakistan has long been an ally of authoritarians...oddly the US once empowered it and relied on it in Afghanistan...kind of like the US then relied on Qatar and made it a major non-NATO ally; bad decisions...
Khan is in Moscow today, he thinks he knows where world is going.
Back in 2019 Khan was at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in Bishkek, Pakistan premier stated the world is standing at a crossroads and the "advent of a multipolar global order" is being witnessed. He likes Russia-China's rise.
The tragedy of what is being done to Ukraine is that it is in a position where if it retaliated and strikes inside Russia it will be accused of “escalating” which is one of the weird aspects of war these days; countries are just supposed to be attacked and fight in borders
If Ukraine acquired defensive weapons it was also seen as “provoking” and if it wanted to join NATO this was portrayed as “provoking”…basically anything Ukraine did was painting it into an unfair corner
The unprovoked attack on Ukraine is unfolding openly and there are no consequences for the airstrikes on Ukraine forces. Total impunity.
@ILAerospaceIAI says it "delivered the first F-16 wing and vertical fin to Lockheed Martin, following the reopening of the F-16 wing assembly line at IAI."
Photos courtesy IAI
"As a result of increased worldwide demand for the F-16 Block 70/72, IAI reopened the assembly lines that had been established in the 1980s to continue production of the F-16 aerostructures assembled at IAI. The F-16 wings and vertical fins will be shipped to the F-16 production"
"and final assembly line in Greenville, South Carolina, USA."