I waited a day to respond to @paulkrugman’s latest column to see if sleeping on it would temper my negative reaction. It didn’t.

Do Democrats Have a Technocrat Problem? nytimes.com/2022/02/22/opi…
Krugman worries about economists with independent, technically based opinions. I worry about columnists who write columns that flatter the prejudices of the constituency they have chosen.
Technocrats proving independence??? I hear frequently from Democratic economists who privately are sharply critical of policy but won’t speak publicly.
The issues range from transitory inflation to corporate greed to buy America to tariffs to certain nominations. That is the larger problem.
As @jasonfurman points out, @paulkrugman's chart about gas prices across countries proves nothing about the incidence of a tax in a single country.
On greed, antitrust, and inflation, I can’t understand Paul’s views. The fact that so many more goods now are in short supply with long queues suggests to me that prices have risen by less, not more, than demand conditions warrant.
The fact that the housing market (which is certainly not concentrated) and the labor market (where monopsony is thought to hold wages down) are on fire should give pause.
Paul won his Nobel Prize for work on increasing returns to scale. Why does he not countenance the idea that rising scale for firms can reduce prices to consumers?

Would he prefer that the Walmarts, Targets and Costcos give way to small local outlets?
How can anyone given the lags involved take seriously the idea that antitrust will matter for inflation over a 2-year horizon?
The obvious explanation for the facts in meatpacking is a shortage of people willing to work in the industry, which reduces supply to consumers and demand from ranchers.
Are there real economic studies (not blogs by political actors) refuting this theory in favor of the monopoly power theory of a few months meat price inflation?
Btw, Paul misrepresents the context of Kennedy’s steel price comments. The key fact was that Kennedy had previously jawboned down wage costs. Very different than anything proposed now.
The best politics over time come from policy success. That depends on sound objective serious analysis, not dominated by political calculation

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lawrence H. Summers

Lawrence H. Summers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LHSummers

Feb 16
.@ASDomash and I released new study showing just how tight labor markets are and just how worrisome this is for inflation.

How Tight are U.S. Labor Markets? nber.org/papers/w29739#…
Labor market tightness looks at a level that historically corresponds to sub 2 percent unemployment.

Our tightness measure predicts inflation better than the unemployment rate or the employment ratio based on time series and cross section data.
According to the most recent high-quality data, the private sector ECI taking out incentive pay and the unsmoothed Atlanta Fed wage tracker, WAGE INFLATION IS RUNNING AT ABOUT 6 PERCENT AND ACCELERATING.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 11
.@JosephEStiglitz is a brilliant micro theorist. Unfortunately, his attempts at practical macroeconomics commit all the errors of wishful thinking that have brought the United States to this point.

A Balanced Response to Inflation rooseveltinstitute.org/2022/02/09/a-b…
In June, he called inflation a red herring and said that if it wasn’t, the Fed could act decisively to stop it. Now with 7 percent inflation he opposes substantial increases in interest rates.
He says inflation is volatile and has come down by half since October. Actually, monthly CPI inflation has been at annualized rates above 7 percent for all of the last 4 months.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 6
I am sorry to see the @nytimes taking MMT seriously as an intellectual movement. It is the equivalent of publicizing fad diets, quack cancer cures or creationist theories.

nytimes.com/2022/02/06/bus…
Yes article does point out data it regards as inconsistent w MMT & quotes @jasonfurman as being critical but this is like reporting symmetrically on the ongoing argument btw evolutionary biology & creationism & noting a development on evolutionary side. Fundamentally misleading
I greatly admire @jeannasmialek's reporting but I was very disappointed this time out. She was also victimized by an egregiously misleading headline, if the goal of her story was to point out MMT’s weakness.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 27
I approve of the Fed’s turn towards recognition of inflation as the primary threat to the US economy. I can’t understand why they are still doing QE on any scale. Perhaps they will learn the lesson that being specific @ future intentions is dangerous b/ of what it locks you into.
I don’t understand the communications strategy behind causing major volatility during the press conference rather than delivering all the messages in the FOMC statement.
The Flexible Average Inflation Target (FAIT) framework taken seriously would require a period of sub 2 percent inflation to offset what we are now going thru.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 19
1/ @paulkrugman works to manufacture disagreement between us over antitrust policy and its relation to inflation.

Paul agrees that increased monopoly power of a kind addressable by antitrust is at most a minor cause of the recent surge in inflation.
2/ I was clear in my tweets that if inflation was simply being used as an impetus to support the Biden competition policy agenda, much of which I support, I had no objection.
3/ Paul invokes Kennedy’s attack on steel executives. That rhetoric was very strong. So were the legal tactics used by his brother’s Justice Dept. Most historians regard Kennedy’s victory as pyrrhic.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 26, 2021
The emerging claim that antitrust can combat inflation reflects “science denial”. There are many areas like transitory inflation where serious economists differ. Antitrust as an anti-inflation strategy is not one of them.
I hope the Admin is simply using inflation as a way of adding urgency to the promotion of competition. That is a possible reading of this important @nytimes @jimtankersley @arappeport article. I strongly support much of the Admin’s competition agenda.

nytimes.com/2021/12/25/bus…
However, as described, hipster Brandeisian antitrust, with which the Admin and its appointees flirt, is more likely to raise than lower prices.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(