🧵1/ INDUE- Cashless Debit Card
"A card by any other name would control as much"
📺A video showing the both the Liberal & National party support for a nationwide Cashless Debit Card
📖A small thread to provide background/context for this crucial issue.
#Auspol #AlboForPM
2/ In 2007 (Liberal's Attempts 1.0) The Liberals pushed for a big bang approach, putting all government services onto one card. It was given the name the “Access Card”.
In 2016 (Liberal's Attempt 2.0) the creeping control began with the first trial of “Indue”
3/ The “Access Card” aimed to put all government services onto one card.
The legislation was created & tabled in parliament.
Imagine how easy it would be to privatise our social services if they are all on one system.
4/ The legislation was given the euphemistic name “Human Services (Enhanced Service Delivery)”.
The media was used to sell the benefits and to ignore the consequences. The Liberals didn't control all MSM then, so some dissenting stories appeared.
5/ The 2006-07 budget had wide ranging funding allocations for the ‘Access Card’, Including the purchase of the software, the transfer of government functions to support the new project.
In true Liberal ideology the system was design to establish operating surplus for MEDICARE
6/ At the same time the Liberals established the
1. 'inquiry into child sex abuse in the NT'
2. which produced the “Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle” (“Little Children are Sacred”) Report.
3. that led to the “NT Emergency Response” Act.
Labor took power 2 months later
7/
4. ALP adopted the recommendations including trailing income management which was formalised with the Basicscard.
5. In 2014 Forest proposed the compulsory income management using a privatising model. This began being used in 2016.
6. Australians will vote to privatise welfarE
8/ The ‘BasicsCard’ was not perfect, however when compared to the Indue card the benefits of the Basicscard are readily apparent. Basics was run from within government with consumer protections, complaints and issues processes and the money remained the property of the person.
9/ The Liberal contempt for those less fortunate is displayed in many ways. The extraordinary act by the Liberals to leak a welfare recipients private information was Orwellian. If the CDC was used by all, the Liberals could weaponise shopping habits as well.
10/ “Less fortunate are worth less” is a core Liberal value. Anne Ruston using negative stereotypes to justify not giving more money to JobSeekers.
Scott Morrison can’t understand why people don’t support govt mandated drug testing. The absence of a moral compass is dangerous
11/ Pauline Hanson’s is the embodiment of policies based on ignorant negative stereotypes, her support for making the CDC mandatory for all welfare recipients is almost guaranteed.
Remember voting for Liberal means voting for Pauline and Malcom Roberts
12/ The hypocritical values of the company running the CDC is shown by its receipt of JobKeeper. There was no way they would have a decline in revenue & their existence is based on the principle of having tax payers money spent appropriately.
13/ Labor does not support the privatisation of welfare. Labor has put a bill into parliament to scrap the CDC. The government and key cross benches have blocked that bill. #AlboForPM
14/ What little research or tracking has been done has shown that the CDC does not achieve any of the goals the government said would be met. A few Liberals and National party people have recognised this, but fail to vote against scrapping the CDC.
15/ So here we are, if Labor are unable to form a government, the Liberals will say they have a mandate to expand the CDC to more places and more cohorts. If you do not want privatised social security then vote #AlboForPM
16/ Please share any of this. Whether on Twitter, Facebook or Tik Tok or anywhere people are unaware of the truths of the Cashless Debit Care, please share any of this.
17/ 890,000 CDC transactions have been declined, only 14% were the result of a prohibited item.
Women have been harrased at checkouts and called dole bludgers when the card is spotted.
The Liberals way of fixing the 'stigma' was to change the look of the card!!!
18/
"The Older Women's Network" video has many examples of CDC's consequences on the lives of people who are already struggling.
Including the full story of the woman who was required to send in pictures of a bra
#AlboForPM
/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AusPolMate Researched Threads & oddities

AusPolMate Researched Threads & oddities Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AusPolMate

May 16
1/ Coalition 70 seat minority government
My thoughts on how Dutton has pitched & wedged his budget to take a 70 seat minority govt.
Salient points;
1. Screw renewables, he has no intention of getting greens voters.
2. Re-use existing power plant locations will upset no one.
2/
3. Migrants & Foreign investors don't vote, so no downside.
This is the same as Greens strategy of protesting against things in places they'll never win.
An example is Greens Anti-Adani risks nothing as they'll never take Capricornia or mining towns.
#Auspol
3/
4. Emissions on RV's are perfect for Nationals electorates and reinforce the Greens/Labor coalition narrative News Corp/Liberal/National will keep driving home.
#Auspol
Read 6 tweets
Feb 29
1/ BREAKING LATEST EMISSIONS⬇️459Mt (YR 2 Dec)
Compared to Paris agreement:
➡️Started in 2005 @ 621Mt
➡️Target 354Mt vs Now 459Mt
➡️Target 43%⬇️2005 vs Now = 25.4%
#Auspol #Renewables
The Australian Labor party are the only party in Australia that has a fully modelled plan for how Australia will reach the Paris Agreement target. The Greens have no modelling and the Liberals don't believe in climate change.
Image
2/
Emission from electricity⬇️4.9%; (7.7 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is more Renewables
Agriculture⬆️2.5%; (2.0 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is bumper crops
Transport⬆️4.5%; (4.2 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is post COVID recovery
Share of Emissions👇 Image
3/
Change in electricity generation in the NEM, trend, by fuel.
COAL & GAS are going⬇️down
Benefits from land use changes are tapering out
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14, 2023
1/ My 10c on Rent Freeze Law -It's easy being Green.
The bill has no cost calculation or estimate.
It's inaccurate to describe the payment as being determined by the Minister. Obviously, the Minister can't determine that $1 is enough, so this section is logically impossible. Image
2/ Property Mgrs/Real-Estate companies will keep the fee while the landlords refund the tenants.
Landlords would need to refund money & redo their tax returns & may need to borrow money to finance the refunds. Image
3/ This will be a disincentive to improving the quality of the rental stock.
Landlords would not want the financial risk of capital improvements that are unable to be recouped.
Body Corporate improvements would become nearly impossible to resolve. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 28, 2023
1/ Greens Hypocrisy Busted:
📷Right: Greens using a 1 in 2,000 year flood model to protest against 855 new homes in Max's wealthy electorate. 855 homes lower values?
📷Left: Greens omits the flood model (I've added it back) from their plan for a new school & some public housing. Max Chandler-Mather lying by omission. The Greens are the ultimate NIMBY party. The Greens use a 1 in 2000 year flood model to discredit the proposed development and then propose an alternative use of the site while not mentioning or showing any flood impacts.
2/This is how the Greens present their plan.

Using just a tiny pocket of land to build some public housing & creating hectares of parkland would increase home values. The Greens @Greens and Max Chandler-Mather posting an alternative plan for the Bulimba Barracks site without using the flood map he used to discredit the existing development proposal.
3/
Here are Max's Facebook posts protesting against development on the old army land.
He doesn't mention the flood model is for a 1 in 2,000-year flood on the old undrained army land. Lies by omission by Max Chandler-Mather and the Greens. Using the 1 in 2000 year flood model but making the reader believe it shows an actual flood.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 8, 2023
1/ 🧵Vile Robodebt lies that live on.
If you’ve been told Labor started/pioneered/”laid the foundations” or in any way was involved with Robodebt you have been told a vile lie.
If you are posting this information, then you are lying.
This thread busts these absurd lies.
2/
NO, Data Matching was NOT started by Shorten/Plibersek & Data Matching is NOT Robodebt .
Data Matching has been undertaken for over 50 years.

The 1975/76 DSS Annual Report👇includes details of data matching for fraud detection.
3/
There is some evidence that parliament was using data matching in 1968. During a debate on conscription, this astute politician warned that the use of machines may apply harsh & substantial laws to an individual and destroy their rights.
Read 18 tweets
Jun 25, 2023
1/ 🧵Greens Housing Policy
A fund by any other name would smell of hypocrisy.
Trust/Fund:
Greens will create a Housing Trust. Sounds similar to a Future Fund, but ministers will have direct control.
Same indirect funding:
States, councils, community housing providers etc.
2/
Labor already has a shared equity scheme.
Interestingly the Greens think houses will cost $300K to build or buy. This will likely limit any new housing to the far reaches of cities. Sounds like a recipe for high-pollution transit and a lack of employment
3/
Greens are literally quoting the existing HAFF. NHFIC is what began in 2018 and had a 5-year life. ALP has extended it by 1 year.
This means greens refer to a fund that raises equity by issuing bonds, etc. Funny how they say they hate this
HAFF is bigger & better than NHFIC
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(