Putin does not care about American culture wars, they are useful to him only insofar as he can use them to subvert and sow division.
Putin has his own goals, and his own worldview. Until we understand him as he understands himself, we'll fail to understand the moment...
2/
I freely admit I'm not a Russia expeet, and I get my takes from others. This is why I have tried to stay within the limits of what others, who are knowledgeable about this stuff, have told me.
What I do know, is that we cannot apply our culture war reasoning to putin...
3/ We absolutely cannot try to cash out this conflict in terms of western cultural values. The Russians have very different concerns, and a different political and moral conception of what is going on.
That is the axis upon which Putin's decision making turns...
4/ This war is not about us, and every time we try to make it so, we get a little further from understanding our current moment.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What saddens me about this is that As far as Christian academics in the academy go, she might be the best we've got. And the best she caN do during a time of war is to snark conservatives about masculinity.
Christianity will lose in the academy, and it deserves to lose....
We will lose because we lack talent, we have no originality, and we can't say anything meaningful or relevant.
Whag our academic think is meaningful, beautiful, deep and important, makes no impact outside a small slice of upper middle class evangelical faux Aesthetes...
We have no vision to offer the world. Most of our writers have been reduced to writing Christian knock offs of secular books.
Like when Rachel Held Evans wrote 'A year of Biblical Womanhood' (in 2012), which is a knock off of 'The Year of Living Biblically' (written 2007)
1/ Let's discuss woke double standards 🧵
IE: Kristin Du Mez wants her book judged on the merits but she endorses the idea conservative Wayne Grudem is a best seller because publishing/distribution networks supported by white patriarchial power structures protect their interests
2/ Woke authors (like Kristin) wants their books judged on the merits of the book, but when it comes to conservstives they switch the standard. Instead of looking at the merits of what a conservative book says they look at "whose interests does the book serve and who benefits?"
3/ Woke writers want their books to be judged fairly using the standard of merit and truth, but she wants conservative authors to be judged cynically according by the standard "whose interests are served and who benefits?"
Kristin Du Mez explicitly mentions blurbing each others books in disscussing the ways various people legitimize each others work, it's perfectly legitimate to say to Kristin "who are you legitimizing, and who legitimizes you."
The game being played by Du Mez, Barr, etc, is to see positive reviews of their own work as rigorous engagement with scholarship, but to regard positive reviews of scholarship they don't like as a social process of legitimization meant to platform and elevate.
That's the move...
"When *YOUR* work is reviewed by people who are politically close to *YOU* it is because you want to legitimize each other and increase your power. But when *OUR* work is reviewed by people who are politically close to *US* it is because we are just doing rigorus scholarship...
1/ Let's talk about why Putin is doing what he's doing.
To understand Putin, we need to understand how Putin sees the world, how he was trained, and what drives him.
To do that we need to unpack a some history so we can put Putin in the context that allows us to understand him.
2/ First off, Putin was a KGB agent. For those of you that don't know the KGB was the Main security agency in Soviet Union. It dealt with internal security, intelligence and secret police functions.
It's isn't exactly this, but imagine combining the FBI and CIA...that's the KGB
3/ The KGB did intelligence work at home and abroad. Internally the KGB would MONITOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPINION, internal subversion, and any revolutionary plots in the Soviet Bloc. The KGB would spy on Soviet citizens and was in charge of stomping out dissent within the USSR...
1/ Putin is attacking now because he knows Biden is weak. The chaotic way Biden pulled out of Afghanistian showed the weakness and incompetence of his administration
2/ That does not mean America should intervene. It means if Biden had not dropped the ball, and if the competence of American institutions had not been eroded we would not be here. Like it or not a lot of Republicans warned about what happens when guys like Putin see weakness.
3/ Those people were rightin saying that projecting American weakness (by doing things like leaving afghanistan in the most incompetent way ever, or letting China get away with hacking the office of personel management with no consequences) invites aggression from bad actors...