George Gao and his band of f*ckerz wait 2 years to inform us of "the results"?
I smell more #sewage than #science, how about you?
@researchsquare
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and animal samples of the Huanan Seafood Market
researchsquare.com/article/rs-137…
I smell more #sewage than #science, how about you?
@researchsquare
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and animal samples of the Huanan Seafood Market
researchsquare.com/article/rs-137…
Of course they point the finger elsewhere
"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
As suspected more #sewage from George Gao
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Gao surely knows more than he reveals here
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
Since at least May 2020 #DRASTIC demanded answers from Wuhan CDC and George Gao by email and petitions, regarding the sewage samples...
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
https://twitter.com/BillyBostickson/status/1265580014054961152
Information of the positive environmental samples
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
"Other Market in Wuhan"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
One sample?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
George Gao Fu is a pathological liar who is in charge of the cover up and limited hangouts. Still he has the absolute gall to try to hoodwink the world by refusing to give specific details on the environmental samples
(May 2020).
(May 2020).
https://twitter.com/BillyBostickson/status/1267118379174752257
Question is, did George Gao et al just spit in our soup and shout "Hail Xi"?
https://twitter.com/BillyBostickson/status/1497289986135433216
Well, they did admit to catching one weasel outside the market, didn't they?
Page 16 (Paper)
A Weasel called George?
Page 16 (Paper)
A Weasel called George?
@mentions@jbloom_lab just published a thread looking at this paper from a more dispassionate angle
My opinion of course is that it misses the wood for the trees.
h/t @Engineer2The
https://twitter.com/jbloom_lab/status/1497627179965845506
My opinion of course is that it misses the wood for the trees.
h/t @Engineer2The
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
