"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Gao surely knows more than he reveals here
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
Since at least May 2020 #DRASTIC demanded answers from Wuhan CDC and George Gao by email and petitions, regarding the sewage samples...
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
"Other Market in Wuhan"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
One sample?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
George Gao Fu is a pathological liar who is in charge of the cover up and limited hangouts. Still he has the absolute gall to try to hoodwink the world by refusing to give specific details on the environmental samples
(May 2020).
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)
page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site
We need to find out why Peter Daszak & EcoHealth had In-Q-Tel backing and why Nathan Wolfe (an obvious intelligence asset with links to Epstein/Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, and Bill Gates) was on their editorial board.