"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Gao surely knows more than he reveals here
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
Since at least May 2020 #DRASTIC demanded answers from Wuhan CDC and George Gao by email and petitions, regarding the sewage samples...
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
"Other Market in Wuhan"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
One sample?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
George Gao Fu is a pathological liar who is in charge of the cover up and limited hangouts. Still he has the absolute gall to try to hoodwink the world by refusing to give specific details on the environmental samples
(May 2020).
1. Remote truck drone swarm bombings are here to stay!
The techniques will be improved and nowhere will be safe unless underground.
Questions to consider:
How many panel vans, transit vans and small trucks are there in a big city at any one time?
2. This is a revolution in sabotage tactics
Welcome to the future of air bases!
Without concrete and earth roofed revetments, aircraft are sitting ducks.kyivpost.com/post/53749
3. The "good old days"
"clandestine antiaircraft devices using gallium metal pencils which when applied to aircraft results In destruction due to stress failure at the point of application"
GREAT REVOLT SCHEME. SECRET PLANS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL. BOLSHEVISING BULGARIA. A BALKAN FRONT. SPENDTHRIFT MURDERER. SPENDS AMILLION FRANCS IN FOURTEEN DAYS. MENUS OF LONDON'S ZOO. MR. CHURCHILL'S BUDGET. HAKKAS AND HOKLOS. PITCHED BATTLE AT PING CHAU.
More stories!
CANTON SITUATION. SPORT IN THE FAR EAST. GERMAN DISARMAMENT. BRITISH SILK DUTIES. COTTON SPINNERS. WORKING WEEK DISPUTE NOT YET SETTLED. FATE OF AMUNDSEN. MR. HAMMER IS MAKING PLANS FOR RESCUE. THE SOFIA OUTRAGE. POSITIONS FOR TROTZKY. THE EPSOM DERBY.
In this enlightened year of our Lord 2025 I, a humble observer of mankind’s ceaseless quest for health, find myself much struck by the ingenious practices of the Orient..
🧵2. A Scaly Panacea
...where the pangolin, that scaly denizen of subtropical climes, hath been elevated to a panacea most wondrous.
The Baicao Chinese Medicine compendium, a veritable gospel of herbal wisdom, doth proclaim the virtues of this creature’s scales...
🧵3. Humanity's Salvation?
...harvested with a diligence that would shame the most ardent of alchemists.
I propose, therefore, a modest scheme to amplify this noble tradition, ensuring that the pangolin’s sacrifice might serve the greater good of humanity.
1. What appears wasteful research to you in the present may be of great value to you or others in the future, if it is given the time to develop to its logical end.
Don’t judge the usefulness of your findings too quickly!
2. What appears wasteful or a dead end to you..
May be of immense value to somebody else!
Don’t judge the usefulness:
1. Of other people’s findings based only on your own assessment of them.
2. Of your own findings based only on your own current assessment of them either.
3. What appears wasteful and a dead end to you..
A. May be the raw stuff that new hypotheses and new research directions are born from.
B. Don’t judge the usefulness of your "investigations" until you have given them enough time to surprise you.
-Deliberate release of bioweapon
-Accidental release of bioweapon in development
-Lab accident during genetic engineering
-Lab accident during cell culture
-Lab accident during vaccine development
-Accidental infection that no one knew about
2⃣ WCDC
• Lab worker infected during field animal sampling
• Accident during experimental work
• Accident from exposure to infected waste
• Accident during move to new location
• WCDC gave bat samples to the WIV
3⃣ Virus engineering
•Engineered from RaTG13
•Engineered from pool of bat viruses (Laos)
•Engineered from secret database of bat viruses
•Engineered at UNC & shipped to the WIV
•Engineered hybrid of bat & pangolin viruses🐵
•Synthetic infectious clone engineered in vitro