"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Gao surely knows more than he reveals here
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
Since at least May 2020 #DRASTIC demanded answers from Wuhan CDC and George Gao by email and petitions, regarding the sewage samples...
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
"Other Market in Wuhan"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
One sample?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
George Gao Fu is a pathological liar who is in charge of the cover up and limited hangouts. Still he has the absolute gall to try to hoodwink the world by refusing to give specific details on the environmental samples
(May 2020).
1. Heinz Felfe was head of the Soviet counter-intelligence Department & ran a long running project called "Panoptikum" to uncover a high level "mole" within the West German Intelligence Service...
In the end, the target of "Panoptikum" would turn out to be Heinz Felfe himself!
2. His Memoirs (in German)
Heinz Felfe published his memoir in 1986 under the title "In the Service of the enemy: Ten years as Moscow's man in the Federal Intelligence Service"
"During initial stages of a forensic investigation of Wuhan Labs, all 4 evaluation tools including Grunow & Finke's epidemiological assessment criteria would be useful adjuncts to the investigation framework of Pilch et al."
"The Radosavljevic–Belojevic method for outbreak scoring & differentiation shows that official assumptions of its natural origin is questionable & highlights the probability that the pathogen was "accidentally" introduced to humans"
@tgof137 @Rebecca21951651 @_everythingism @AtomsksSanakan @CallumJCParr @jhas5 1. It is best to do your own reading & consult the research of others, such as #DRASTIC, who published all the most accurate details on labs, locations, engineering flaws, viral databases, field sampling of bats, lack of proper biosafety, etc. years ago: