"studies from different countries suggest that SARS-CoV-2 circulation preceded initial detection of cases.. Some positive samples were detected earlier than 1st case in Wuhan, suggesting circulation in other regions may have been missed"
Of the 110 samples collected from sewers or sewerage wells in the market, 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. All 4 sewerage wells in the market tested positive.
Gao surely knows more than he reveals here
"This suggested that either contaminated sewage may have played a role in the cluster of cases in the market or that the infected people in the market contaminated the sewage"
Since at least May 2020 #DRASTIC demanded answers from Wuhan CDC and George Gao by email and petitions, regarding the sewage samples...
What did the international community get in response? Zilch, Nada, Mei You, Nothing!
It is a bloody outrage to #science and a vicious stab in the back to all of us that they waited 2 whole years to reveal their findings.
Likely timed as yet another attempt to obfuscate the origins (which Gao well knows about).
"Other Market in Wuhan"
Note well Lines 371 to 374:
"4 positive samples were not included in this table.
One sample was collected from "other market in Wuhan" and 3 collected from sewerage wells in surrounding areas"
One sample?
in Spanish "Que Cara!" "What a Bloody Cheek"
They declare 1 positive sample from "other markets" & then kindly tell us the 2 markets in question:
*"other markets were Dongxihu market & Huanggang Center market"
One + sample?
How about telling us WHICH MARKET, FFS?
George Gao Fu is a pathological liar who is in charge of the cover up and limited hangouts. Still he has the absolute gall to try to hoodwink the world by refusing to give specific details on the environmental samples
(May 2020).
"Participant 12" (maybe a soldier at Aldershot). after infection with SC2, over time experienced a substantial number of mutations suggestive of rapid evolution.
Ferdinand de Lesseps's success in building the Suez Canal in 1869 was utterly derailed by the abysmal failure of his subsequent effort to build the Panama Canal due to disease.
Bankruptcy!
800 thousand people had invested their savings in the project!
Good luck using your critical thinking skills to seperate wheat from chaff so that you can decide what is propaganda & what is fact.
Of course the easy options are to dismiss everything as lies or to swallow everything as fact.
2. What I recommend
If you are interested in a balanced analysis of the Russian claims and all the detailed evidence presented by Kirillov before his assassination in Moscow, as well as relted topics, then I highly recommend you plough through those threads at your leisure.