Sanctions have very rapidly escalated, as transatlantic consensus has consolidated. Two key things to note now: 1) Escalation is proactive, not reactive, for the first time since 2014; 2) Moscow has not responded.
It’s important not to exaggerate here. Economies, like wars, aren’t fully predictable. Putin may not have calculated such a rapid response, but he will have known that these kinds of sanctions were on the cards.
Moreover, Russia has a highly skilled central bank and finance ministry, who will have contingency plans. At best, though, those plans will slow the impact of sanctions, rather than eliminating it.
The real impact of sanctions will come from what Alan Greenspan called the “animal spirits” — the herd-like response of countless economic actors caught up in an emotional spiral.
If sanctions have an effect, it won’t be by changing Putin’s mind. It will be by altering the animal spirits of the Russian economy, creating a panic about the future that leads to a massive political shift.
To be clear, this is not guaranteed to happen. Indeed, such things happen rarely in politics, and there are powerful forces arrayed against them.
What plays against Putin at the moment, though, is the fact that however prepared he and his gov’t are for these sanctions, Russian elites and masses are cognitively and emotionally _unprepared_.
Most Russians throughout the socioeconomic food chain never believed war was likely. Even if they support it, it has come as a shock. A catastrophic failure of the currency — among other possible fallouts — will thus come out of the blue.
While there are no signs of panic as yet — and nothing significant has hit yet, save for a dip in the ruble and financial markets — friends in Moscow are already reporting that bank machines have no cash.
Many, of course, have seen that before and will not find it troubling. It’s also a problem the central bank can handle. But the fact that it isn’t causing a panic suggests that people aren’t aware of what may be coming. And if they’re not aware, they’re not prepared.
Nor is the gov’t doing anything to prepare people — not bracing them psychologically, and not explaining how to cope if/when the sh*t hits the fan. That’s a mistake.
Events in Kazakhstan this winter reminded everyone what can happen when you have geographically or socially localized pockets of extreme hardship. Russia has avoided that throughout 8 years of decline by using its considerable liquidity to spread the pain around.
That kind of austerity will become much harder to manage as liquidity declines and the pain multiplies. And it will become impossible to manage if people come to the conclusion that the pain is sure to get worse.
I’ll have some more cogent thoughts on this — and a few other things — in coming days. Stay tuned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, as always, mixed signals, with basically two avenues of interpretation: either things are about to get better, or they're about to get a lot worse.
Here's what we know. The Russians and Ukrainians met, talked at some length, released very similar statements confirming that talks would continue, and returned to Moscow and Kyiv for consultations.
But that's only half the story. The other half is that Kharkiv came in for the most brutal air and artillery assault of the war to date (as best I can tell), attacks on Kyiv renewed, and Russia continued to mass troops and equipment outside the capital.
Anti-war protests in Russia do not appear to be waning. Per @OvdInfo, a further 2700 arrests today in 51 cities, bringing the total number of arrests since the invasion to nearly 6k.
Protests appear smaller than the Jan/Feb 2021 protests around Navalny’s arrest, but maybe not by much (good numbers are hard to come by). And the more frequently we see scenes like 👇, the bigger they’ll get.
The real question, though, is when scenes like the one above begin to interact with scenes like the one below, where people queue to get money out of their bank accounts:
Question for those who actually understand these things: @LawDavF@james_acton32@CameronJJJ@KofmanMichael — When Putin orders nuclear forces on “special preparedness”, what does that mean in practice? And what impact does that have on the posture of US forces?
The rhetoric is one thing — and entirely subject to interpretation. But presumably these sorts of orders also have a technical side to them, which can have its own consequences. Trying to understand that.
Apologies if you’ve written about this already and I’ve not been able to find it.
I’m not here to supplant the analysis of military experts: if you want to understand the ins and outs of the war, and of how Russia fights wars, follow @KofmanMichael@RALee85@LawDavF and others. But let me take a moment for a bit of politics.
When Putin announced the war, he talked about the invasion in the same breath as Russia’s wars in Chechnya and Syria. As @KofmanMichael mentions in the thread above, those wars were brutal. That’s one of the things that was so frightening about the possibility of war in Ukraine.
One more thread today, and then I'm going to take a break and decompress for a while. This one's about protests and Russian public opinion.
Per @OvdInfo, there have been ~1700 arrests at anti-war protests across Russia today. Given the propensity of these numbers to lag, the actual number is probably higher.
We don't know how many people came out to protest. It may not have been very many, but it will likely have been 10-20 times the number who were arrested, at least.
Reading between the lines on sanctions, it's a decidedly mixed picture.
What has been announced thus far is very clearly not the full package of sanctions that had been on the table. Exactly why that's the case is a question worth discussing.
To be clear, these sanctions will hurt. Quite a bit. Together with the falling ruble, the financial and banking sanctions will sap Russia's reserves and raise its capital costs.
The sanctions on the offspring of oligarchs are more interesting. These are designed to sharpen the focus of the entirety of the Russian elite on the future, and to force them to reconsider whether they're willing to let Putin mortgage their kids' futures.