Do you see the Ukrainians sitting around fretting about how "dangerous" Putin is? No! They're painting him as weak and vulnerable. Accordingly, persuadable nations agreed to get on board with trying to take Putin down.
Liberal activists in America need to learn this strategy.
Fortunately in America we don't have to dodge bombs and convince other nations to work with us. All we have to do is use our voices to convince persuadable voters to side with us. But we do that with the exact same mindset the Ukrainians are taking toward Putin.
The people in the middle, the people who don't have a side, the people who sit back and wait for a cause they like to come along, love siding with a clear winner.
Ukraine has won over the world by making everyone see that it should win, and that it CAN win.
Contrast this with the approach of most liberal activists, whose message to persuadable voters is along the lines of "our side is ineffective, we're gonna lose, democracy is over, and we're all dead anyway, so vote for us!"
When put in those terms, do you see now how laughably ineffective that kind of messaging is when it comes to trying to win over voters? It only COSTS us votes. Almost no one wants to get behind the team they're being told is going to lose anyway.
Some of you are saying "Yep, Biden and the Democrats should be more like Zelensky!"
WRONG.
Biden an the Democrats are pretty good at messaging. You just don't pay attention to it.
The problem is YOU, the people reading this. YOU'RE the ones pushing harmful defeatist messaging.
Those of you reading this should be more like Zelensky.
Stop feeling sorry for yourselves. Stop fretting. Stop pretending that cowering is "vigilance."
Decide you're going to win, then put in the work required to win. You may still not win, but it's the only way you CAN win.
Ukraine won over the world by convincing persuadable nations that it could win and Putin could be defeated.
American liberal activists win elections by convincing persuadable voters that the Democrats can win, and the Republicans can be defeated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vladimir Putin is "frustrated and directing unusual bursts of anger at people in his inner circle," per NBC News. We're watching Putin unravel in real time. Now is the time to ratchet things up. Let's put even more financial pressure on the Russian oligarchs to finish him off.
What really stands out is that the U.S. has this information. Either we have a mole very high in Putin's regime, or we've bugged the most "secure" rooms in the Kremlin, or Putin's advisers have decided it's time for him to go and are leaking this stuff to us accordingly.
No way to know for sure, but at least one of the above type of scenarios must be true. More to the point, there's no way for Putin to know which of the age scenarios are true. Does he start tearing out the walls, taking out his advisers?
Among the people who actually watch the State of the Union, few stay tuned in for the other party's rebuttal. Even fewer watch the followup speeches from fringe members of the President's own party. Who cares who all gives a followup speech? The whole thing is a non-story.
For one thing, the SOTU rebuttal is a dead end. If you give a solid speech, you get no attention. If you do something dumb (Rubio / water, Ernst / plastic bags, etc), your career trajectory stops right there. It's why the GOP is sending a loser like Kim Reynolds out there.
Most of the people who want to hear the rebuttal aren't going to sit through a SOTU from a President they hate, just to hear the rebuttal. And no one knows what time the rebuttal is going to start, so no one tunes in just for that. The rebuttal only goes viral if you screw up.
The pundits yelling “we’re getting nuked for sure” are getting all the retweets, TV bookings, and critical praise for “bravely telling it like it is.” And when they’re proven wrong, they’ll pay no price. There’s always 100% upside, and no downside, for pushing doomsday hysteria.
The pundits will keep feeding you this doomsday hysteria bullshit, and the media will keep amplifying and praising it, until you stop enjoying the taste of it. For career reasons, they have to feed you what you’re hungry for, even if they know it’s bullshit.
Even if these doomsday pundits are right (which they somehow never are), their advice on how to deal with impending doom is for you to sit there and stare at your screen in fear. The bad faith nature of their advice proves that they don’t believe their own premise to begin with.
Ron DeSantis is a weak ineffective coward who makes empty moves to try to fictionally portray himself as a strongman. If you call him a "dictator" and such, just so you can be outraged at him, you're HELPING him. Want to defeat him? Expose him as the weakest loser in the nation.
Think it through. DeSantis WANTS to be seen as a dictator / authoritarian. If you feed that narrative, even in order to bash him, then you're working full time for DeSantis. You're his de facto publicist. You just don't know it, because you don't realize it's WHAT HE WANTS.
Most liberal pundits spend every day brainwashing us into believing that the only way to deal with someone like DeSantis (Trump, Putin, etc) is to sit around fretting about how "dangerous" he is. BUT THAT HELPS HIM. You're a moron if you think that's how political activism works.
You never cut off diplomatic channels, even in war, if you can help it. It’s important to note that the United States has kicked 12 Russian diplomats out of the UN, not as an arbitrary punitive measure, but because they were caught doing disqualifying things (most likely spying).
Putin has a history of putting spies in diplomatic positions in order to give them cover, and the U.S. has a history of monitoring Russian diplomats as if they were spies. This is nothing new in that sense.
The U.S. possibly already knew Russia’s UN diplomats were spies, and instead of expelling them, merely monitored them to see what could be learned. If so, why expel them now? It weakens Russia’s ability to influence the current UN general assembly.
I get Putin keeping his own advisers at the far end of the table. One of them could be trying to take him out. But Putin also made up a silly excuse to sit 20 feet from Macron, who obviously wasn’t going to poison him. This all suggests Putin could be physically ill.
The shortest answer would be fear of covid (the excuse he used with Macron). But why keep friends AND foes at the far end of a 20 foot table? Putin can surely have his own people tested for covid before he’s in a room with them, as a lot of world leaders have been doing.
And why would Putin suddenly have paranoia about covid now, at this late date? Covid is not over, but it’s certainly in a major downswing, in terms of spread and severity.