Deep dive into how #Russia's state bureaucracy sees Putin's decision to got to full-scale war with Ukraine by well-connected @faridaily_ :
tl;dr: Only few were in the loop, there's little public outrage now, but sizable despondence or even discontent.
faridaily.substack.com/p/-?utm_source…
This largely squares with sources of @kgaaze and Pertsev as summarized in their podcast, i.e. most didn't have a clue or simply didn't want to believe in war beyond the Donbas. A short summary of their latest podcast by @scharap here:
Who knew about Putin's decision according to Rustamova: MoD Shoigu, General Staff Chief Gerasimov, leadership of counterintelligence (assuming she refers to FSB, Bortnikov). Even the Kremlin's chief of staff Vaino was kept in the dark, also due to a protracted Covid sickness.
In the (civilian) bureaucracy, not many appear to be happy, but evidently are willing to put up with coming turmoil out of duty of service. Most feel they do not have any influence over decision-making anyways, and the true consequences are yet poorly understood.
Putin played divide-and-rule with his bureaucracy: The large majority got tiny bits of information, but only very few were aware of the whole picture that would unfold with the attack on Ukraine. Even most attendees of the extended Security Council meeting didn't know details.
PM Mishustin admitted during Security Council meeting the Russian government had been preparing for sanctions for months, but it is unlikely that the government expected this scale of Western firmness. Lots of ad-hoc decision-making despite preparetions.
thebell.io/v-pravitelstve…
We already know by now that business tycoons Fridman, Deripaska, Chubays & Tinkov publicly voiced their discontent with Putin's decision to go to war. But according to Rustamova's sources VTB's Andrei Kostin "is mourning" as 20 years of his work for the state bank are in tatters.
As for the State Duma, three CPRF deputies Smolin, Matveev & Markhaev have voiced discontet with Putin's decision to go to war. More importantly, the state parliament had no clue what they voted for when the asked Putin to recognize DNR/LNR, they certainly didn't expect this war.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fabian Burkhardt

Fabian Burkhardt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fa_burkhardt

Mar 2
Lots of speculations Russia might introduce martial law on Friday Mar 04 as the Federation Council - the upper chamber of parliament - convenes for an emergency session. Some arguments for the sake of discussion why the rationale for introducing martial law remains unclear 👇
Martial law is introduced by presidential decree. Putin has to inform State Duma & Federation Council immediately. The Federation Council must approve martial law within 48 hours to become effective. I.e. we should see the presidential decree before or on Friday. Historically...
this would be the first martial law in post-Soviet Russia. Even in 1990s, the "state of emergency" was declared only a few times due to territorial conflicts in North Ossetia & Ingushetia. The 2 wars in Chechnya were conducted without state of emergency. The martial law states...
Read 10 tweets
Mar 2
Further evidence that Putin kept most of civilian bureaucracy in Government, Presidential Administration, state companies in the dark: The government made preparations for sanctions after recognition of DNR/LNR, but not for full-scale war against Ukraine.
t.me/wwwagentsmedia…
As one interlocutor close to the Kremlin told the journalists: Many are shocked, but officials cannot step down, this would be seen as treason. Resigning from top position now would essentially mean to go straight into prison.
This obviously doesn't mean that they do not bear full responsibility, they do. Moreover, this could be a strategy of blame-shifting to military. Nonetheless, evidence is mounting that the circle of decision-makers was even narrower than with regard to annexation of Crimea 2014.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(