Lots of speculations Russia might introduce martial law on Friday Mar 04 as the Federation Council - the upper chamber of parliament - convenes for an emergency session. Some arguments for the sake of discussion why the rationale for introducing martial law remains unclear 👇
Martial law is introduced by presidential decree. Putin has to inform State Duma & Federation Council immediately. The Federation Council must approve martial law within 48 hours to become effective. I.e. we should see the presidential decree before or on Friday. Historically...
this would be the first martial law in post-Soviet Russia. Even in 1990s, the "state of emergency" was declared only a few times due to territorial conflicts in North Ossetia & Ingushetia. The 2 wars in Chechnya were conducted without state of emergency. The martial law states...
the reasons when martial law can be declared: these relate to the sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity of Russia. I.e. it would only make sense if Russia expected an attack by Ukraine or another state on its territory. But then again, Russia could come...
up with any pretext. But: The law was clearly written with a democratic Russia in mind. Under personalist authoritarianism, most goals such as censorship, prohibition of parties or organizations, limits on freedom of movement, the prohibition of protests, the ban of international
or foreign organizations can be achieved without martial law. Think of legislation on extremism and terrorism (destruction of Navalny's network, ban of Jehova's Witnesses etc.), laws on undesirable orgs & foreign agents, crackdown on protests, blocking of Ekho Moskvy & TvRain...
But crucially, martial law would undermine Russia's narrative that the war in Ukraine is *only* a limited "special operation" or "military operation" to pacify the Donbas. With martial law introduced, each and every Russian would understand the war with Ukraine is real, but that
... does not seem to be what Putin wants. At least that is what the media ban of the word "war" suggests. Another option would be to introduce martial law in the Russian regions bordering Ukraine. but then all the limitations on rights and freedoms would also be limited to ...
those regions and could not be instrumentalized for a nation-wide crackdown.
Let's wait for Friday, and here's @Stanovaya's case for martial law.
Footnote: General/partial mobilization can be declared by presidential decree without declaration of martial law. Duma & Federation Council need to be informed, but no approval necessary. But mobilization would certainly edge Russia closer to martial law.
t.me/pchikov/4662

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fabian Burkhardt

Fabian Burkhardt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fa_burkhardt

Mar 2
Further evidence that Putin kept most of civilian bureaucracy in Government, Presidential Administration, state companies in the dark: The government made preparations for sanctions after recognition of DNR/LNR, but not for full-scale war against Ukraine.
t.me/wwwagentsmedia…
As one interlocutor close to the Kremlin told the journalists: Many are shocked, but officials cannot step down, this would be seen as treason. Resigning from top position now would essentially mean to go straight into prison.
This obviously doesn't mean that they do not bear full responsibility, they do. Moreover, this could be a strategy of blame-shifting to military. Nonetheless, evidence is mounting that the circle of decision-makers was even narrower than with regard to annexation of Crimea 2014.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 1
Deep dive into how #Russia's state bureaucracy sees Putin's decision to got to full-scale war with Ukraine by well-connected @faridaily_ :
tl;dr: Only few were in the loop, there's little public outrage now, but sizable despondence or even discontent.
faridaily.substack.com/p/-?utm_source…
This largely squares with sources of @kgaaze and Pertsev as summarized in their podcast, i.e. most didn't have a clue or simply didn't want to believe in war beyond the Donbas. A short summary of their latest podcast by @scharap here:
Who knew about Putin's decision according to Rustamova: MoD Shoigu, General Staff Chief Gerasimov, leadership of counterintelligence (assuming she refers to FSB, Bortnikov). Even the Kremlin's chief of staff Vaino was kept in the dark, also due to a protracted Covid sickness.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(