In the climate of anti-Russia hysteria, little thought is given to the implications of the massive rearmament program that is being undertaken in Germany under the pretext of defending Ukraine. But the militarist frenzy on display in the German Bundestag should give pause. 1/
Germany, already the dominant economic power in the EU, will now be on course to become the dominant military power in Western and Central Europe. This is not great news for France, and that is probably why Macron is trying to keep his lines of communication with Putin open. 2/
It should be recalled that Britain and France were bitterly opposed to the reunification of Germany in 1989. Though they dared not say so in public, Prime Minister Thatcher and President Mitterand were frightened that a reunified Germany would be uncontrollable. 3/
An Official British Foreign Office document, released in 2010, records a discussion between Mitterand and Thatcher in January 1990. The French president feared that the "sudden prospect of reunification had delivered a mental shock to the Germans." 4/
The effect "had been to turn them once again into the 'bad' Germans they used to be. They were behaving with a certain brutality and concentrating on reunification to the exclusion of everything else." 5/
Mitterand said that he "did not think Europe was ready for German reunification: and he could not accept that it had to take priority over everything else." 6/
But the Germans would not listen to him. "Unless you were wholeheartedly for reunification, you were an enemy of Germany." Mitterand then told Thatcher, "in strict confidence," that he had been very "blunt" with Chancellor Kohl and Foreign Minister Genscher. 7/
"He had said to them that no doubt Germany could if it wished achieve reunification, bring Austria into the European Union and EVEN REGAIN TERRITORIES WHICH THEY HAD LOST AS A RESULT OF THE WAR. THEY MIGHT MAKE EVEN MORE GROUND THAN HITLER." [Emphasis added] 8/
Mitterand feared that as a result of reunification, "we would all be back in 1913." But it was not possible to oppose reunification. "In reality," he lamented, "there was no force in Europe which could stop it happening. None of us were going to declare war on Germany." 9/
Reunification threatened British and French interests. "President Mitterand said that he shared the Prime Minister's concerns about the Germans' so-called mission in central Europe. 10/
"The Germans seemed determined to use their influence to dominate Czechoslovakia, Poland and Hungary. That left only Rumania and Bulgaria for the rest of us... 11/
"The Prime Minister said that we should not just accept the Germans had a particular hold over the countries of Eastern Europe but do everything to expand our own links." 12/
While its forces are currently directed against Russia, the NATO coalition contains within itself explosive contradictions. The war in Ukraine marks the final and decisive breakdown of the entire post-World War II order. 13/
The world is confronted with a volcanic eruption of imperialist violence. Catastrophe can be avoided only through the growth of the international class struggle, directed toward the conquest of power by the working class and the establishment of world socialism. 14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The deep-rooted and essential causes of a war are revealed not in how a war begins but, rather, how it develops and to what it leads. The American Civil War was not caused by the firing on Fort Sumter. The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand did not cause World War I. 1/
That the Civil War was ultimately about the destruction of slavery (and the resulting unfettered growth of modern capitalism In the United States) would become clear in historical retrospect. 2/
That the assassination of the Austrian archduke in Sarajevo was little more than a trigger event for the eruption of long simmering inter-imperialist conflicts was apparent in 1914 only to the most farsighted Marxists (especially Lenin, Trotsky and Luxemburg). 3/
In today's climate of amnesia, journalists, historians and other professional framers of middle class public opinion - whose moral compass is set by the #NYTimes - seem to have forgotten the bloody days of "shock and awe," back in March 2003, when the US pulverized Baghdad. 1/
The page 1 article by the Times' reporter began: "In a blaze of heavy bombing, American air power devastated parts of Baghdad tonight, including several government buildings and palaces built by Saddam Hussein, as waves of fresh ground forces swarmed into Iraq from the south." 2/
The report continued: "The air battle was most visible in the capital, but military officials said it was only the beginning of an unfolding campaign that in the first 24 hours was expected to hit 1,500 targets all across Iraq." 3/
Professor Hett should know better. The comparison of Ukraine to Spain is a grotesque distortion of history. The Spanish Civil War was a historic confrontation between the revolutionary Spanish working class, fighting for socialism, and a fascist counter-revolution. 1/
If Professor Hett were to travel to Ukraine, he would find himself fighting alongside the fascists of the Azov Brigade and rightwing elements from all over the world, anxious to receive training for paramilitary operations in their own countries. 2/
In the Spanish Civil War, Franco was armed by Nazi Germany and fascist Italy; and benefited from the covert sympathy of French and British imperialism. Roosevelt's "neutrality" helped assure Franco's victory. 3/
The essential causes and interests of wars are, at first, not apparent. They are concealed by an avalanche of propaganda. But, sooner or later, the real and more profound causes and significance of the conflict emerge. 1/ #warukraine
In this case, and with considerable speed, the essential nature of this war is being revealed. #Ukraine is only the initial physical battleground in what is, in essence and fact, a war between NATO and Russia. 2/
The non-membership of Ukraine in #NATO is, and has been for several years, a fiction. Already substantially armed and with weapons pouring in, Ukraine is the frontline in a war aimed at regime change in Moscow and the complete subordination of Russia to NATO. 3/
Why should one be pleased that German politicians in the Bundestag are openly blaring out militarist language that they have not dared use since 1945? Why is it not possible to oppose the Russian invasion without becoming a cheerleader for US/NATO warmongering? 1/
The worst aspect of Putin’s action is that it has facilitated a vast escalation of US-NATO militarism. And as so often in the past, the middle class is being swept along. All the past and ongoing crimes of US imperialism are forgotten and forgiven. 2/
It is entirely correct to sympathize with the plight of the Ukrainian people and to oppose the invasion on principled left wing grounds. But why accept the deceitful and hypocritical narrative of the Biden administration? 3/
Reflecting on #CarnegieHall's decision to bar #Gergiev from conducting, it is worth recalling a historic event. The first concert ever performed at the illustrious theater, which opened in 1891, was conducted by the great Russian composer, Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky. 1/
He was allowed to perform despite the fact that Russia was ruled at the time by Tsar Alexander III. During the reign of this brutal monarch, there occurred bloody attacks on Jews throughout Russia. The worst of these occurred in Kiev, Odessa, and Warsaw. 2/
The tsar and his police encouraged the violence. The word "pogrom" (from the Russian "pogromu', meaning "devastation") was understood throughout the world as synonymous with homicidal anti-Semitism. 3/