The deep-rooted and essential causes of a war are revealed not in how a war begins but, rather, how it develops and to what it leads. The American Civil War was not caused by the firing on Fort Sumter. The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand did not cause World War I. 1/
That the Civil War was ultimately about the destruction of slavery (and the resulting unfettered growth of modern capitalism In the United States) would become clear in historical retrospect. 2/
That the assassination of the Austrian archduke in Sarajevo was little more than a trigger event for the eruption of long simmering inter-imperialist conflicts was apparent in 1914 only to the most farsighted Marxists (especially Lenin, Trotsky and Luxemburg). 3/
In the mass of hysterical commentary on the #UkraineRussianWar, it is all but impossible to find - outside of the World Socialist Web Site - any attempt to place the outbreak of the conflict in a broader geopolitical, not to mention, historical context. 4/
Learned academics - even those who have grappled for decades with the complex problem of historical causation - are in a state of intellectual collapse and are content to let CNN, MSNBC and, of course, the New York Times, think for them. 5/
Here are just a few questions that are not, but should be, asked: 1) What is the relation between the domestic crisis in every country (including Russia), exacerbated by the pandemic that has claimed 20 million lives, to the eruption of war? 6/
2) What is the relation between the wars that have been waged without stop by the United States over the last 30 years, often with NATO collaboration, to the rapidly escalating confrontation with Russia? 7/
3) Is Germany's decision to triple its military budget and effectively do away with all post-World War II restraints on its armed forces nothing more than a spontaneous response to the Ukraine war? Or has the war provided Germany with a pretext for long-planned rearmament? 8/
4) Having vastly expanded NATO and moved its forces hundreds of miles eastward, does the United States view the war as an opportunity to inflict a massive defeat on Russia, leading to its eventual break up? What is the relation of this confrontation to conflict with China? 9/
5) What are the global corporate and financial interests that benefit from war and would profit from the breakup of Russia and unfettered access to its immense resources on the Eurasian landmass? 10/
But the most important question that is not being asked: What will be the consequences if this confrontation escalates into a nuclear war? What will be left of the planet? 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The war is having a devastating impact on historians. There are entirely principled and leftwing grounds upon which the Russian invasion of #Ukraine should be opposed, and which do not require adapting to the US-NATO coverup of fascism in Ukraine's past and present. 1/
But unfortunately, even historians who have written major works on the fascist Stepan Bandera, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and the UPA (Ukrainian Insurgent Army) are renouncing their own scholarship to suit the needs of the US-NATO propaganda campaign. 2/
The "Statement on Ukraine by scholars of genocide, Nazism and WWII" is a disgraceful example of the intellectual and moral capitulation of significant segments of the academic community to the demands for historical falsification. 3/
In today's climate of amnesia, journalists, historians and other professional framers of middle class public opinion - whose moral compass is set by the #NYTimes - seem to have forgotten the bloody days of "shock and awe," back in March 2003, when the US pulverized Baghdad. 1/
The page 1 article by the Times' reporter began: "In a blaze of heavy bombing, American air power devastated parts of Baghdad tonight, including several government buildings and palaces built by Saddam Hussein, as waves of fresh ground forces swarmed into Iraq from the south." 2/
The report continued: "The air battle was most visible in the capital, but military officials said it was only the beginning of an unfolding campaign that in the first 24 hours was expected to hit 1,500 targets all across Iraq." 3/
Professor Hett should know better. The comparison of Ukraine to Spain is a grotesque distortion of history. The Spanish Civil War was a historic confrontation between the revolutionary Spanish working class, fighting for socialism, and a fascist counter-revolution. 1/
If Professor Hett were to travel to Ukraine, he would find himself fighting alongside the fascists of the Azov Brigade and rightwing elements from all over the world, anxious to receive training for paramilitary operations in their own countries. 2/
In the Spanish Civil War, Franco was armed by Nazi Germany and fascist Italy; and benefited from the covert sympathy of French and British imperialism. Roosevelt's "neutrality" helped assure Franco's victory. 3/
In the climate of anti-Russia hysteria, little thought is given to the implications of the massive rearmament program that is being undertaken in Germany under the pretext of defending Ukraine. But the militarist frenzy on display in the German Bundestag should give pause. 1/
Germany, already the dominant economic power in the EU, will now be on course to become the dominant military power in Western and Central Europe. This is not great news for France, and that is probably why Macron is trying to keep his lines of communication with Putin open. 2/
It should be recalled that Britain and France were bitterly opposed to the reunification of Germany in 1989. Though they dared not say so in public, Prime Minister Thatcher and President Mitterand were frightened that a reunified Germany would be uncontrollable. 3/
The essential causes and interests of wars are, at first, not apparent. They are concealed by an avalanche of propaganda. But, sooner or later, the real and more profound causes and significance of the conflict emerge. 1/ #warukraine
In this case, and with considerable speed, the essential nature of this war is being revealed. #Ukraine is only the initial physical battleground in what is, in essence and fact, a war between NATO and Russia. 2/
The non-membership of Ukraine in #NATO is, and has been for several years, a fiction. Already substantially armed and with weapons pouring in, Ukraine is the frontline in a war aimed at regime change in Moscow and the complete subordination of Russia to NATO. 3/
Why should one be pleased that German politicians in the Bundestag are openly blaring out militarist language that they have not dared use since 1945? Why is it not possible to oppose the Russian invasion without becoming a cheerleader for US/NATO warmongering? 1/
The worst aspect of Putin’s action is that it has facilitated a vast escalation of US-NATO militarism. And as so often in the past, the middle class is being swept along. All the past and ongoing crimes of US imperialism are forgotten and forgiven. 2/
It is entirely correct to sympathize with the plight of the Ukrainian people and to oppose the invasion on principled left wing grounds. But why accept the deceitful and hypocritical narrative of the Biden administration? 3/